Quality assurance in flexible sigmoidoscopy: medical and nonmedical endoscopists
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The clinical assessment of position in colon and hence completion during flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is believed to be inaccurate. The technique of applying endomucosal clips with follow-up X-ray has previously been used for establishing completion in colonoscopy. Furthermore, we have now trained non-healthcare professionals (non-medical endoscopists, NME) to perform FS, but there is no data on assessment of their performance of FS. We performed this study with the aims of determining accuracy of endoscopists’ clinical impression regarding actual position of endoscope in colon during FS, comparing medical (ME) and NME in terms of clinical accuracy, and to determine role of endomucosal clips with follow-up X-rays in documenting completion and hence quality assurance.
All patients undergoing elective FS, except those with surgical resection, were included, after ethics approval. During FS, endoscopist applied an endomucosal clip at most proximal bowel reached and endoscopists recorded their independent opinion about position of clip. Post procedure, all patients underwent an abdominal X-ray, reported by consultant radiologist, blinded to outcome of FS. X-ray results were compared with endoscopist findings. Complete FS was defined as one where descending colon was reached.
Fifty-one patients, with median age of 55 years, participated in study. The endoscopists were accurate in their assessment of position in colon in 38 patients (75%). The attending nurse was accurate in only 31% of cases. The crude and corrected completion rates were 73% and 84%, respectively. There was no correlation between length of endoscope and its position in colon. There were no differences between NME and ME in terms of clinical accuracy.
This study has shown that clinical impression of endoscopist during FS regarding position is not very accurate, implying need for regular quality assurance. The technique of applying endomucosal clips with follow-on abdominal X-ray is an excellent objective measure of quality assurance in FS. NME can perform FS with comparable completion rates and accuracy.
- Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CPJ, Weiss NS (1992) A case–control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 326:653–657 CrossRef
- Gilbertsen VA, Nelms JM (1978) The prevention of invasive cancer of the rectum. Cancer 41:1137–1139 CrossRef
- Thompson M, Prytherch D (1996) Rectal bleeding: when is it right to refer? Practitioner 240:198–200
- Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Northover JM, Whynes DK (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy. Lancet 341(8847):736–740 CrossRef
- Lehman GA, Buchner DM, Lappas JC (1983) Anatomical extent of fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 84:803–808
- Stewart BT, Keck JO, Duncan AV et al (1999) Difficult or incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for a screening programme. Aust NZ J Surg 69:19–21 CrossRef
- Adam IJ, Ali Z, Shorthouse AJ (2000) How accurate is the endoscopist’s assessment of visualization of the left colon seen at flexible sigmoidoscopy? Colorectal Dis 2:41–44 CrossRef
- Maslekar S, Ramachadran M, Avery G, Duthie GS (2005) Role of endomucosal clips in quality assurance in colonoscopy. Endoscopy 27(Suppl 1):A274
- Non-medical endoscopists: a report of the working party of the British Society of Gastroenterology. http://www.bsg.org.uk/bsgdisp1.php?id=dfe46c7d8f3f528587ae&h=1&m=00023. Accessed 21 March 2008
- Safety and sedation during endoscopic procedures. http://www.bsg.org.uk/pdf_word_docs/sedation.doc. Accessed 25 March 2008
- Investigators UFSST (2002) Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 359:1291–1300 CrossRef
- Thompson MR, Flashman KG, Wooldrage K, Rogers PA, Senapati A, O’Leary DP, Atkin W (2008) Flexible sigmoidoscopy and whole colonic imaging in the diagnosis of cancer in patients with colorectal symptoms. Br J Surg 95(9):1140–1146 CrossRef
- Levin TR, Farraye FA, Schoen RE, Hoff G et al (2005) Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multisociety task group. Gut 54:807–813 CrossRef
- Maslekar MH, Skinn E, Gardiner A, Culbert B, Duthie GS (2006) Non-medical colonoscopists are safe and effective: results from randomised controlled trial. Gut 55:A5
- Quality assurance in flexible sigmoidoscopy: medical and nonmedical endoscopists
Volume 24, Issue 1 , pp 89-93
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Quality assurance
- Endomucosal clips
- Flexible sigmoidoscopy
- Industry Sectors