Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has theoretical patient advantages. Because public attitude toward NOTES will influence its adoption, this study aimed to assess patients’ opinions regarding the NOTES procedure.
For this study, 192 patients were surveyed. Both NOTES and laparoscopic surgery (LS) are described together with an example case. Presurgical patients rated the importance of various aspects of surgical procedures and their preference for cholecystectomy via NOTES or LS.
Complication risks, recovery time, and postoperative pain were considered more important than cosmesis, cost, length of hospital stay, or anesthesia type (p < 0.001). In the self-reports, 56% of the respondents preferred NOTES for their cholecystectomy and 44% chose LS. The patients perceived NOTES as having less pain, cost, risk of complications, and recovery time but requiring more surgical skill than open surgery or LS (p < 0.04). College-educated patients were more likely to choose NOTES, whereas patients 70 years of age or older and those who had undergone previous flexible endoscopy were less likely to select NOTES (p < 0.04). Although 80% of the patients choosing NOTES still preferred it even if it carried a slightly greater risk than LS, their willingness to choose NOTES decreased as complications, cost, and hospital distance increased and as surgeon experience decreased (p < 0.001). This study had a limitation in that the survey population was from surgery clinics.
A majority of the patients surveyed (56%) would choose NOTES for their cholecystectomy. The deciding characteristics of the patients were more education, youth, and no previous flexible endoscopy. Procedure-related risks, pain, and recovery time were more important than cosmesis, cost, length of hospital stay, and anesthesia type in the choice of a surgical approach. Patients were less willing to accept NOTES as risks and costs increased and as surgeon experience and availability decreased.
- Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117 CrossRef
- Hu B, Chung SC, Sun LC, Kawashima K, Yamamoto T, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV, Pasricha PJ, Eagle Claw II (2005) A novel endosuture device that uses a curved needle for major arterial bleeding: a bench study. Gastrointest Endosc 62:266–270 CrossRef
- Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, Chung SS, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Scorpio DG, Magee CA, Pipitone LJ, Kalloo AN (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61:449–453 CrossRef
- Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Chung SS, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Magee CA, Vaughn CA, Barlow D, Shimonaka H, Kalloo AN (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292 CrossRef
- Swanstrom LL, Kozarek R, Pasricha PJ, Gross S, Birkett D, Park PO, Saadat V, Ewers R, Swain P (2005) Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 9:1129–1136 CrossRef
- Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2005) Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:892–896 CrossRef
- Squirrell DM, Majeed AW, Troy G, Peacock JE, Nicholl JP, Johnson AG (1998) A randomized, prospective, blinded comparison of postoperative pain, metabolic response, and perceived health after laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy. Surgery 123:485–495 CrossRef
- Schirmer BD, Dix J (1992) Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 2:145–150
- Peters JH, Gibbons GD, Innes JT, Nichols KE, Front ME, Roby SR, Ellison EC (1991) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 110:769–777
- Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152,776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141:1207–1213 CrossRef
- Archer SB, Sims MM, Giklich R, Traverso B, Laycock B, Wolfe BM, Apfelgren KN, Fitzgibbons RJ, Hunter JG (2000) Outcomes assessment and minimally invasive surgery: historical perspective and future directions. Surg Endosc 14:883–890 CrossRef
- Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67:854–860 (Epub 20 Mar 2008) CrossRef
- Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery
Volume 23, Issue 7 , pp 1519-1525
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Patient preference
- Public opinion
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Legacy Health System and Oregon Health Sciences University, 1040 NW 22nd Avenue, Suite 560, Portland, OR, 97210, USA
- 2. Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA