Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery
- Lee L. SwanstromAffiliated withDivision of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Legacy Health System and Oregon Health Sciences University Email author
- , Eric VolckmannAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
- , Eric HungnessAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
- , Nathaniel J. SoperAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has theoretical patient advantages. Because public attitude toward NOTES will influence its adoption, this study aimed to assess patients’ opinions regarding the NOTES procedure.
For this study, 192 patients were surveyed. Both NOTES and laparoscopic surgery (LS) are described together with an example case. Presurgical patients rated the importance of various aspects of surgical procedures and their preference for cholecystectomy via NOTES or LS.
Complication risks, recovery time, and postoperative pain were considered more important than cosmesis, cost, length of hospital stay, or anesthesia type (p < 0.001). In the self-reports, 56% of the respondents preferred NOTES for their cholecystectomy and 44% chose LS. The patients perceived NOTES as having less pain, cost, risk of complications, and recovery time but requiring more surgical skill than open surgery or LS (p < 0.04). College-educated patients were more likely to choose NOTES, whereas patients 70 years of age or older and those who had undergone previous flexible endoscopy were less likely to select NOTES (p < 0.04). Although 80% of the patients choosing NOTES still preferred it even if it carried a slightly greater risk than LS, their willingness to choose NOTES decreased as complications, cost, and hospital distance increased and as surgeon experience decreased (p < 0.001). This study had a limitation in that the survey population was from surgery clinics.
A majority of the patients surveyed (56%) would choose NOTES for their cholecystectomy. The deciding characteristics of the patients were more education, youth, and no previous flexible endoscopy. Procedure-related risks, pain, and recovery time were more important than cosmesis, cost, length of hospital stay, and anesthesia type in the choice of a surgical approach. Patients were less willing to accept NOTES as risks and costs increased and as surgeon experience and availability decreased.
KeywordsCholecystectomy GI Endoscopy Laparoscopy NOTES Patient preference Public opinion
- Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery
Volume 23, Issue 7 , pp 1519-1525
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Patient preference
- Public opinion
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Legacy Health System and Oregon Health Sciences University, 1040 NW 22nd Avenue, Suite 560, Portland, OR, 97210, USA
- 2. Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA