Performance measures of surgeon-performed colonoscopy in a Veterans Affairs medical center
Quality indicators are increasingly emphasized in the performance of colonoscopy. This study aimed to determine the standard of care rendered by surgeon-endoscopists in a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center by evaluating the indications for colonoscopy and outcome performance measures according to established quality indicators for colonoscopy.
A prospective standardized computer endoscopic reporting database (ProVation MD) was retrospectively reviewed. All colonoscopies performed by attending surgeons at the San Diego VA medical center between 1 January 2004 and 31 July 2007 were included in the study. Patients with charts that had incomplete reporting were excluded. The quality indicators used included the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) criteria for colorectal cancer screening, the American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines for postcancer resection surveillance, and the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopists (ASGE) quality indicators for colonoscopy.
The data for 558 patients (96% men) were analyzed. The average patient age was 63 years (range, 25–93 years). Almost all the colonoscopies (99%) were performed in accordance with established criteria. The most common indications for colonoscopy were screening (n = 143, 26%), non-acute gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 127, 23%), polyp surveillance (n = 100, 18%), postcancer resection surveillance (n = 91, 17%), abdominal pain (n = 19, 4%), and anemia (n = 14, 3%). Postcancer resection surveillance colonoscopies were performed according to recommended criteria in 98% of the cases. The cecal intubation rate was 97%, and the overall adenoma detection rate was 26%. Two patients (<1%) experienced complications requiring intervention.
The study data indicate that surgeon-performed colonoscopies meet standard quality criteria for indications and performance measures. The authors therefore conclude that surgeon-endoscopists demonstrate proficiency in the standard of care for colonoscopy examinations.
- Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM, ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy (2006) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:873–885
- Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Bond JH, Brooks D, Burt RW, Byers T, Fletcher RH, Hyman N, Johnson D, Kirk L, Lieberman DA, Levin TR, O’Brien MJ, Simmang C, Thorson AG, Winawer SJ (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 56:160–167 CrossRef
- ASGE (2000) Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 52:831–837
- Reed DN Jr, Collins JD, Wyatt WJ, Hull JE, Patton ML, Dahm SO, Dabideen HH, Hudson JC, Allen DB (1992) Can general surgeons perform colonoscopy safely? Am J Surg 163:257–259 CrossRef
- Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ SAGES, Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group (2001) A prospective analysis of 13, 580 colonoscopies: reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15:251–261 CrossRef
- Wexner SD, Eisen GM, Simmang C (2002) Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 16:367–369 CrossRef
- Wexner SD, Forde KA, Sellers G, Geron N, Lopes A, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ (1998) How well can surgeons perform colonoscopy? Surg Endosc 12:1410–1414 CrossRef
- Marshall JB, Barthel JS (1993) The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc 39:518–520 CrossRef
- Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G (2000) Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 343:162–168 CrossRef
- Goldenberg EA, Khaitan L, Huang IP, Smith CD, Lin E (2006) Surgeon-initiated screening colonoscopy program based on SAGES and ASCRS recommendations in a general surgery practice. Surg Endosc 20:964–966 CrossRef
- Chen SC, Rex DK (2007) Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 102:856–861 CrossRef
- Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL (2006) Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355:2533–2541 CrossRef
- Vernava AM III, Longo WE (1996) Complications of endoscopic polypectomy. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 5:663–673
- Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA (2000) Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol 95:3418–3422 CrossRef
- Iqbal CW, Chun YS, Farley DR (2005) Colonoscopic perforations: a retrospective review. J Gastrointest Surg 9:1229–1235 CrossRef
- Performance measures of surgeon-performed colonoscopy in a Veterans Affairs medical center
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 23, Issue 10 , pp 2364-2368
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Adenoma detection rate
- Performance measures
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA
- 3. Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA, 92161, USA
- 2. Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA
- 4. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA