Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Concerns have been raised regarding outcome after laparoscopic resection of hepatic neoplasms. This prospective study compared morbidity and adequacy of surgical margins in laparoscopic (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR).
Outcome in 359 consecutive patients [male/female ratio 187/172; median age 60 years (range 18–84 years)] who underwent partial hepatectomy was analysed. Cirrhosis was present in 32 patients and preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 141 patients. Comparative analyses were performed using propensity scores for all and for matched patients (n = 76 per group).
Complications occurred in 68/250 (27.2%) patients after OLR and in 6/109 (5.5%) after LLR [odds ratio (OR) 0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.37; p < 0.0001]. Median intraoperative blood loss was 500 ml (range 10–7,000 ml) in OLR and 100 ml (range 5–4,000 ml) in LLR (p < 0.0001). Postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 0–155 days) after OLR and 6 days (range 0–41 days) after LLR (p < 0.0001). In patients treated for liver malignancy, the surgical resection margin was positive on histopathological examination in 5/237 after OLR and in 1/77 after LLR. The magnitude of the resection margin was 7.5 mm (range 0–45 mm) in OLR and 10.0 mm (range 0–30 mm) in LLR (p = 0.087).
LLR for hepatic neoplasms seems to be noninferior to OLR regarding adequacy of surgical margins, and superior to OLR regarding short-term postoperative outcome.
- Buell JF, Thomas MJ, Doty TC, Gersin KS, Merchen TD, Gupta M, Rudich SM, Woodle ES (2004) An initial experience and evolution of laparoscopic resectional surgery. Surgery 136:804–811 CrossRef
- Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Chang S, Van Nhieu JT, Loriau J, Karoui M, Duvoux C, Dhumeaux D, Fagniez PL (2006) Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives. Ann Surg 243:499–506 CrossRef
- Gigot JF, Glineur D, Santiago Azagra J, Goergen M, Ceuterick M, Morino M, Etienne J, Marescaux J, Mutter D, van Krunckelsven L, Descottes B, Valleix D, Lachachi F, Bertrand C, Mansvelt B, Hubens G, Saey JP, Schockmel R; Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic Section of the Royal Belgian Society of Surgery and the Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery (2002) Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors. Preliminary results of a multicenter European study. Ann Surg 236:90–97 CrossRef
- Hompes D, Aerts R, Penninckx F, Topal B (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection using radiofrequency coagulation. Surg Endosc 21:175–180 CrossRef
- Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution. Less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–394 CrossRef
- Vibert E, Perniceni T, Levard H, Denet C, Shahri NK, Gayet B (2006) Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 93:67–72 CrossRef
- Chang S, Laurent A, Tayar C, Karoui M, Cherqui D (2007) Laparoscopy as a routine approach for left lateral sectionectomy. Br J Surg 94:58–63 CrossRef
- Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliairy Pancreat Surg 12:351–355 CrossRef
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:214–215 CrossRef
- D’Agostino (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281 CrossRef
- Parsons LS (2001) Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. SAS SUGI Proc 26:214–226
- Simillis C, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Darzi A, Lovegrove R, Jiao L, Antoniou A (2007) Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms – a meta-analysis. Surgery 141:203–211 CrossRef
- Shapiro S (1994) Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 140:771–778
- Koffron A, Geller D, Gamblin C, Abecassis M (2006) Laparoscopic liver surgery: shifting the management of liver tumors. Hepatology 44:1694–1700 CrossRef
- Karoui M, Penna C, Amin-Hashem M, Mitry E, Benoist S, Franc B, Rougier P, Nordlinger B (2006) Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the risk of major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 243:1–7 CrossRef
- Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results
Volume 22, Issue 10 , pp 2208-2213
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Departments of Abdominal Surgery, Biostatistics, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- 2. Management Information & Reporting, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium