Laparoscopic partial splenectomy
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The immunologic function of the spleen and its important role in immune defense has led to splenic-preserving surgery. This study aimed to evaluate whether laparoscopic partial splenectomy is safe.
Data on consecutive patients presenting with localized benign or malignant disease of the spleen were included in a prospective database. The surgical technique consisted of six steps: patient positioning and trocar placement, mobilization of the spleen, vascular dissection, parenchymal resection, sealing/tamponading of the transected edge, and removal of the specimen.
From 1994 to 2005, 38 patients underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy. The indications included splenomegaly of unknown origin, splenic cysts, benign tumors (hamartoma), and metastasis from ovarian carcinoma and schwannoma. The median operating time was 110 min (range, 65–148 min). The median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range, 4–7 days). There was no postoperative mortality. Postoperative pleural effusion occurred in two patients. There were no reoperations. Three patients required blood transfusions.
Laparoscopic partial splenectomy is safe for patients with localized benign or malignant disease of the spleen.
- Bonanomi G, Prince JM, McSteen F, Schauer PR, Hamad GG (2004) Sealing effect of fibrin glue on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: implications for the endoscopic treatment of leaks. Surg Endosc 18: 1620–1624 CrossRef
- Carroll BJ, Phillips EH, Semel CJ, Fallas M, Morgenstern L (1992) Laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 6: 183–185 CrossRef
- Delaitre B (1991) Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach: report of a case. Presse Med 20: 2263
- Singer DB (1973) Postsplenectomy sepsis. Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1: 285–311
- Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan RL (2005) Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 85: 1–18 CrossRef
- Targarona EM, Espert JJ, Balague C, Piulachs J, Artigas V, Trias M (1998) Splenomegaly should not be considered a contraindication for laparoscopic splenectomy. Ann Surg 228: 35–39 CrossRef
- Uranues S, Alimoglu O (2005) Laparoscopic surgery of the spleen. Surg Clin North Am 85: 75–90 CrossRef
- Uranues S, Kronberger L, Kraft-Kine J (1994) Partial splenic resection using the TA-stapler. Am J Surg 168: 49–53 CrossRef
- Uranüs S (1995) Physiology of splenic function. In: Uranüs S (ed) Current spleen surgery. W Zuckschwerdt Verlag, München-Bern-Wien-NewYork pp 11–13
- Uranüs S, Fingerhut A, Kronberger L, Pfeifer J, Mischinger HJ (1999). Splenic trauma. Eur Surg 31: 75–78 CrossRef
- Uranüs S, Pfeifer J (2001) Nonoperative treatment of blunt splenic injury. World J Surg 25: 1405–1407 CrossRef
- Uranüs S, Pfeifer J, Schauer C, Kronberger L, Rabl H, Ranftl G, Hauser H, Bahadori K (1995) Laparoscopic partial splenic resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 133–136
- Van Wyck DB, Witte MH, Witte CL, Thies AC Jr (1980) Critical splenic mass for survival from experimental pneumococcemia. J Surg Res 28: 14–17 CrossRef
- Wolf HM, Eibl MM, Georgi E, Samstag A, Spatz M, Uranüs S, Passl R (1999) Long-term decrease of CD4+CD45RA+ T cells and impaired primary immune response after posttraumatic splenectomy. Br J Haematol 107: 55–68 CrossRef
- Laparoscopic partial splenectomy
Volume 21, Issue 1 , pp 57-60
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Laparoscopic hemisplenectomy
- Partial resection of the spleen
- Splenic preservation
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Penn State University Clinical Campus, 1240 South Cedar Crest Boulevard, Suite 210, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA
- 2. Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria