Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Previous studies have relied on conversion rate and operative time for construction of learning curves in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The authors hypothesized that conversion rate and operative time were less important than complication and readmission rates in defining good outcomes and hence the learning curve.
A database of 287 consecutive laparoscopic colorectal resections from a single tertiary referral center was analyzed. Outcome measures included operative time, conversion rate, major and minor complications, length of hospital stay, and the 15- and 30-day hospital readmission rate. Data were analyzed both by surgeons and by quartile case numbers.
A total of 151 right colectomies and 136 left colectomies were performed between 1995 and 2005. For both right and left colectomies, the conversion rate decreased in each of the first three quartiles, reaching a nadir of 0% for right colectomies and 3% for left colectomies in the third quartile. The conversion rates increased slightly in the fourth quartile. The operative time remained stable for three quartiles, then increased slightly in the fourth quartile. Two surgeons managed 199 of the 287 cases. Analysis of the two high-volume surgeons demonstrated that for left-sided resections, the surgeon with the shorter operative times had the higher major complication rate (13% vs 2%), overall complication rate (22% vs 2%), 30-day readmission rate (13% vs 0%), and length of stay (3.8 vs 3.1 days) (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).
In this series, operative time failed to decrease with experience, and shorter operative times did not correlate with better clinical outcomes. The failure of operative time to decline with experience often reflects surgeons’ willingness to attempt more difficult cases rather than an accurate representation of a “learning curve.” Therefore, complication and readmission rates are more important than operative time and conversion rates for evaluating the learning curve and quality of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
- Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do we go faster? Surg Endosc 11: 331–335 CrossRef
- Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1,194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132: 41–45
- Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059 CrossRef
- Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Kohler L, Barlehner E, Kockerling F, LCSSG (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15: 116–120 CrossRef
- Pandya S, Murray J, Coller J, Rusin LC (1999) Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversion to laparotomy. Arch Surg 134: 471–475 CrossRef
- Shah PR, Joseph A, Haray PN (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications. Postgrad Med J 81: 537–540 CrossRef
- Stephen AE, Berger DL (2003) Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection. Surgery 133: 277–282 CrossRef
- Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242: 83–91 CrossRef
- Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Volume 21, Issue 2 , pp 238-243
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
- Learning curve
- Length of stay
- Operative time
- Industry Sectors