Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: An electromyographic-based study Authors
First Online: 23 June 2004 Received: 25 June 2003 Accepted: 04 March 2004 DOI:
Cite this article as: Matern, U., Kuttler, G., Giebmeyer, C. et al. Surg Endosc (2004) 18: 1231. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-9162-1 Abstract Background
The ergonomic deficiencies of various minimally invasive surgery (MIS) instrument handles are well-known. In the past, many studies have been performed to gain a better understanding of ergonomics in MIS. The current study investigates muscle strain during various dynamic tasks with different instrument handles.
Five different handle designs were tested: the axial handle (Aesculap), the vario handle (own model), multifunctional and ring handles (both Karl Storz), and the shank handle (Wilo). Ten subjects without any surgical training tested the following instrument functions: precise dynamic movement, rotation of the closed instrument, and simultaneous opening and closing of the effector. During these three trials, task performance (errors / duration) and the electromyographic activity of the hand and lower arm muscles were measured.
Regarding the errors and the time required to carry out the tasks, the five handles showed similar results. The muscle activity was lowest for the precise dynamic movement task and highest during the rotation task. The axial handle required significantly more muscle activity than all other handles.
On the basis of these data, it was possible to construct characteristic muscle activation patterns for each handle. However, these patterns were not task specific. Accordingly, they may form a basis to improve the ergonomics of MIS handles with regard to muscle strain.
Key words Laparoscopy Surgical instruments Ergonomics Human factors Electromyography References
Berguer, R, Gerber, S, Kilpatrick, G, Beckley, D 1998 An ergonomic comparison of inline vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper Surg Endosc 12 805 808 CrossRef PubMed
Berguer, R, Gerber, S, Kilpatrick, G, Remler, M, Beckley, D 1999 A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic reponses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp Ergonomics 42 1634 1645 CrossRef PubMed
Berguer, R, Rab, GT, Abu-Ghaida, H, Alarcon, A, Chung, J 1997 A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures Surg Endosc 11 139 142 CrossRef PubMed
Corlett, EN 1995 The evaluation of posture and its effects Wilson, JR Corlett, EN eds. Evaluation of human work. A practical ergonomics methodology Taylor & Francis London 689 692
Emam, T, Frank, T, Hanna, G, Cuschieri, A 2001 Influence of handle design on the surgeon’s upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing Surg Endosc 15 667 672 CrossRef PubMed
Emam, T, Hanna, G, Cuschieri, A 2002 Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing Surg Endosc 16 267 271 CrossRef PubMed
Hanna, GB, Shimi, S, Cuschieri, A 1997 Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporal knotting Surg Endosc 11 397 401 CrossRef PubMed
Laparoscopic Surgery Update 1997 Reduce fatigue and discomfort: tips to improve operating room setup Laparosc Surg Update 5 97 100
Matern, U 2001 Principles of ergonomic instrument handles Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 10 169 173 CrossRef
Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Faist M (2001) Ergonomic aspects of different handles for minimally invasive surgery—an EMG-based study. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual meeting, pp 1269–1273
Matern, U, Giebmeyer, C, Bergmann, R, Waller, P, Faist, M 2002 Ergonomic aspects of four different types of laparoscopic instrument handles with respect to elbow angle—an EMG-based study Surg Endosc 16 1528 1532 CrossRef PubMed
Matern, U, Rückauer, KD, Farthmann, EH 2000 Die Arbeitshaltung des laparoskopisch tätigen Chirurgen—Ideal und Wirklichkeit Zentr Chir 125 698 701 CrossRef
Matern, U, Waller, P 1999 Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: principles of ergonomic handles Surg Endosc 13 174 182 CrossRef PubMed
Matern, U, Waller, P, Eichenlaub, M, Rückauer, KD 1999 MIS instruments: an experimental comparison of various laparoscopic handles and their design Surg Endosc 13 756 762 CrossRef PubMed
Patkin M (1997) A check-list for handle design. Ergonomics Australia On-Line 11(2),
Patkin, M, Isabel, L 1993 Ergonomics and laparoscopic general surgery Graber, JN Schultz, LS Pietrafitta, JJ Hickok, DF eds. Laparoscopic abdominal surgery McGraw-Hill New York
Quick, NE, Gillette, JC, Shapiro, R, Adrales, GL, Gerlach, D, Park, AE 2003 The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgical training procedures Surg Endosc 17 462 465 CrossRef PubMed
Rau, G 1977 Anwendung der Elektromyographie bei der Beurteilung körperlicher Momentan-und Langzeitbeanspruchung Z Arb Wiss 31 112 120
Rohmert, W 1973 Physische Beanspruchung Schmidtke, H eds. Ergonomie 1 Grundlagen menschlicher Arbeit und Leistung. Carl Hanser Verlag Munich 225 255
Uchal, A, Brogger, J, Rukas, R, Karlsen, B, Bergamaschi, R 2002 In-line versus pistol-grip handles in a laparoscopic simulators. A randomized controlled crossover trial Surg Endosc 16 1771 1773 CrossRef PubMed
Veelen, MA, Meijer, DW 1999 Ergonomics and design of laparoscopic instruments: results of a survey among laparoscopic surgeons J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techiques A 9 481 489
Veelen, MA, Meijer, DW, Goossens, RHM, Snijders, CJ 2001 New ergonomic criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forceps J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techniques 11 17 26 CrossRef