Oecologia

, Volume 129, Issue 1, pp 65–74

Repeated insect defoliation effects on growth, nitrogen acquisition, carbohydrates, and root demography of poplars

Authors

  • Kevin R. Kosola
    • W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, 3700 E. Gull Lake Dr., Hickory Corners, MI 490690, USA
  • Donald I. Dickmann
    • Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
  • Eldor A. Paul
    • Crop and Soil Science Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
  • Dylan Parry
    • Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

DOI: 10.1007/s004420100694

Cite this article as:
Kosola, K.R., Dickmann, D.I., Paul, E.A. et al. Oecologia (2001) 129: 65. doi:10.1007/s004420100694

Abstract.

Large-scale outbreaks of defoliating insects are common in temperate forests. The effects of defoliation on tree physiology are expected to cascade through the entire forest ecosystem, altering carbon, nitrogen, and water fluxes, and subsequently affecting nitrogen cycling and plant-herbivore interactions. If these post-defoliation changes are largely driven by N deficiency, tree root system responses to defoliation should be central to regulating the long-term effects of defoliation; N fertilization should reverse the effects. We examined these phenomena in a 3-year large-scale replicated manipulative field experiment in a hybrid poplar plantation, where we regulated defoliation by gypsy moths as well as nitrogen availability. To our knowledge, this is the first manipulative field experiment at this scale to examine the effects of severe insect defoliation on whole-tree physiology. Defoliation decreased tree growth and increased the rate of top dieback in the stand. Defoliation led to transient declines in carbon allocation to starch in fine roots, trunk, and twigs in the year of heaviest defoliation. Root production and root mortality were unaffected by the heaviest defoliation, but nitrate and ammonium uptake were strongly depressed. N fertilization increased tree growth, but did not alter defoliation effects on starch accumulation or top dieback. Defoliation and fertilization treatments did not interact. In this system, defoliation effects on tree recovery of leaf nitrogen lost to herbivory were primarily driven by effects on nitrogen uptake, rather than effects on root production or mortality.

Lymantria dispar Root demography Starch Ammonium Nitrate

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2001