, Volume 119, Issue 1, pp 120–125

Predators and mutualists influence the exclusion of aphid species from natural communities

  • C. B. Müller
  • H. C. J. Godfray

DOI: 10.1007/s004420050767

Cite this article as:
Müller, C. & Godfray, H. Oecologia (1999) 119: 120. doi:10.1007/s004420050767


We investigated why two species of aphids (Aphis jacobaeae and Brachycaudus cardui) were very rare in a study site despite their abundance in the surrounding area. The study site contained many common species of aphid and we tested the hypothesis that the community of aphid predators in the field excluded the missing species. Colonies of the two aphid species were artificially initiated in the experimental site and allocated to one of four treatments: control; ground predator exclusion; total predator exclusion, and provision of mutualist ants. Two measures of colony performance were analysed: longevity and cumulative aphid density. Colonies decline naturally in late summer but control colonies disappeared very quickly while colonies protected from all predators survived the longest. The performance of colonies protected from just ground predators was intermediate. We failed to persuade ants to tend A. jacobaeae. Colonies of B. cardui attended by ants performed better than controls and those with ground predators excluded, but not as well as those with all predators excluded. We conclude that the absence of the two species of aphid in the study site is influenced by the resident predator community, and by the availability of mutualists.

Key words Establishment Aphids Predator community Mutualists Dynamic monophagy 

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. B. Müller
    • 1
  • H. C. J. Godfray
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK e-mail: c.godfray@ic.ac.uk Tel.: +44-1344-294215, Fax: +44-1344-294339GB

Personalised recommendations