, Volume 147, Issue 4, pp 585–595

Population divergence in growth rate and antipredator defences in Rana arvalis

Population Ecology

DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0301-3

Cite this article as:
Laurila, A., Pakkasmaa, S. & Merilä, J. Oecologia (2006) 147: 585. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0301-3


Growth and development rates often differ among populations of the same species, yet the factors maintaining this differentiation are not well understood. We investigated the antipredator defences and their efficiency in two moor frog Rana arvalis populations differing in growth and development rates by raising tadpoles in outdoor containers in the nonlethal presence and absence of three different predators (newt, fish, dragonfly larva), and by estimating tadpole survival in the presence of free-ranging predators in a laboratory experiment. Young tadpoles in both populations reduced activity in the presence of predators and increased hiding behaviour in the presence of newt and fish. Older tadpoles from the slow-growing Gotland population (G) had stronger hiding behaviour and lower activity in all treatments than tadpoles from the fast-growing Uppland population (U). However, both populations showed a plastic behavioural response in terms of reduced activity. The populations differed in induced morphological defences especially in response to fish. G tadpoles responded with relatively long and deep body, short tail and shallow tail muscle, whereas the responses in U tadpoles were often the opposite and closer to the responses induced by the other predators. U tadpoles metamorphosed earlier, but at a similar size to G tadpoles. There was no evidence that growth rate was affected by predator treatments, but tadpoles metamorphosed later and at larger size in the predator treatments. G tadpoles survived better in the presence of free-ranging predators than U tadpoles. These results suggest that in these two populations, low growth rate was linked with low activity and increased hiding, whereas high growth rate was linked with high activity and less hiding. The differences in behaviour may explain the difference in survival between the populations, but other mechanisms (i.e. differences in swimming speed) may also be involved. There appears to be considerable differentiation in antipredator responses between these two R. arvalis populations, as well as with respect to different predators.


Growth rateInducible defencesPlasticityPopulation differentiationPredation

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anssi Laurila
    • 1
  • Susanna Pakkasmaa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Juha Merilä
    • 3
  1. 1.Population Biology/ Department of Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology CenterUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.National Board of FisheriesInstitute of Freshwater ResearchDrottningholmSweden
  3. 3.Ecological Genetics Research Unit, Department of Bio- and Environmental SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland