Human Genetics

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 167–178

Assessment of systematic effects of methodological characteristics on candidate genetic associations

  • Badr Aljasir
  • John P. A. Ioannidis
  • Alex Yurkiewich
  • David Moher
  • Julian P. T. Higgins
  • Paul Arora
  • Julian Little
Original Investigation

DOI: 10.1007/s00439-012-1237-4

Cite this article as:
Aljasir, B., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Yurkiewich, A. et al. Hum Genet (2013) 132: 167. doi:10.1007/s00439-012-1237-4

Abstract

Candidate genetic association studies have been found to have a low replication rate in the past. Here, we aimed to assess whether aspects of reported methodological characteristics in genetic association studies may be related to the magnitude of effects observed. An observational, literature-based investigation of 511 case–control studies of genetic association studies indexed in 2007, was undertaken. Meta-regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between 23 reported methodological characteristics and the magnitude of genetic associations. The 511 studies had been conducted in 52 countries and were published in 220 journals (median impact factor 5.1). The multivariate meta-regression model of methodological characteristics plus disease category accounted for 17.2 % of the between-study variance in the magnitude of the reported genetic associations. Our findings are consistent with the view that better conducted and better reported genetic association research may lead to less inflated results.

Supplementary material

439_2012_1237_MOESM1_ESM.docx (311 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 311 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Badr Aljasir
    • 1
    • 2
  • John P. A. Ioannidis
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Alex Yurkiewich
    • 1
  • David Moher
    • 1
    • 6
  • Julian P. T. Higgins
    • 7
  • Paul Arora
    • 8
  • Julian Little
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Community MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.National Guard Health AffairsWestern RegionJeddahSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research CenterStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  4. 4.Department of Health Research and PolicyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  5. 5.Department of StatisticsStanford University School of Humanities and SciencesStanfordUSA
  6. 6.Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteOttawaCanada
  7. 7.MRC Biostatistics UnitCambridgeUK
  8. 8.Office for Biotechnology, Genomics and Population HealthPublic Health Agency of CanadaTorontoCanada