Extended Y chromosome haplotypes resolve multiple and unique lineages of the Jewish priesthood
- Michael F. Hammer,
- Doron M. Behar,
- Tatiana M. Karafet,
- Fernando L. Mendez,
- Brian Hallmark,
- Tamar Erez,
- Lev A. Zhivotovsky,
- Saharon Rosset,
- Karl Skorecki
- … show all 9 hide
Abstract
It has been known for over a decade that a majority of men who self report as members of the Jewish priesthood (Cohanim) carry a characteristic Y chromosome haplotype termed the Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH). The CMH has since been used to trace putative Jewish ancestral origins of various populations. However, the limited number of binary and STR Y chromosome markers used previously did not provide the phylogenetic resolution needed to infer the number of independent paternal lineages that are encompassed within the Cohanim or their coalescence times. Accordingly, we have genotyped 75 binary markers and 12 Y-STRs in a sample of 215 Cohanim from diverse Jewish communities, 1,575 Jewish men from across the range of the Jewish Diaspora, and 2,099 non-Jewish men from the Near East, Europe, Central Asia, and India. While Cohanim from diverse backgrounds carry a total of 21 Y chromosome haplogroups, 5 haplogroups account for 79.5% of Cohanim Y chromosomes. The most frequent Cohanim lineage (46.1%) is marked by the recently reported P58 T->C mutation, which is prevalent in the Near East. Based on genotypes at 12 Y-STRs, we identify an extended CMH on the J-P58* background that predominates in both Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi Cohanim and is remarkably absent in non-Jews. The estimated divergence time of this lineage based on 17 STRs is 3,190 ± 1,090 years. Notably, the second most frequent Cohanim lineage (J-M410*, 14.4%) contains an extended modal haplotype that is also limited to Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi Cohanim and is estimated to be 4.2 ± 1.3 ky old. These results support the hypothesis of a common origin of the CMH in the Near East well before the dispersion of the Jewish people into separate communities, and indicate that the majority of contemporary Jewish priests descend from a limited number of paternal lineages.
-
blah
439_2009_727_MOESM1_ESM.jpg
(382KB)
Figure S1. Network of J-410* haplotypes observed within Ashkenazi (black) and non-Ashkenazi Cohanim (white). Circle areas are proportional to haplotype frequency with the smallest circles representing singletons. The branch lengths are proportional to the number of STRs separating the nodes. (JPG 381 kb)
-
blah
439_2009_727_MOESM2_ESM.jpg
(318KB)
Figure S2. Network of J-410* haplotypes observed within Cohanim (yellow) and a sample of non-Jews from North Africa, the Near East, and Central/South Asia (Blue). Circle areas are proportional to haplotype frequency with the smallest circles representing singletons. The branch lengths are proportional to the number of STRs separating the nodes. (JPG 318 kb)
-
blah
439_2009_727_MOESM3_ESM.jpg
(328KB)
Figure S3. Network of J-M12 haplotypes observed within Cohanim (yellow) and a sample of non-Jews from from North Africa, the Near East, and Central/South Asia (Blue). Circle areas are proportional to haplotype frequency with the smallest circles representing singletons. The branch lengths are proportional to the number of STRs separating the nodes. (JPG 327 kb)
-
blah
439_2009_727_MOESM4_ESM.jpg
(322KB)
Figure S4. Network of R-M269 haplotypes observed within Cohanim (yellow) and a sample of non-Jews from the Near East, Europe, and Central/South Asia (Blue). Circle areas are proportional to haplotype frequency with the smallest circles representing singletons. The branch lengths are proportional to the number of STRs separating the nodes. (JPG 321 kb)
-
blah
439_2009_727_MOESM5_ESM.jpg
(289KB)
Figure S5. Network of J-410* (yellow) and J-M318 (red) haplotypes observed within Cohanim and a sample of non-Jews from from North Africa, the Near East, and Central/South Asia (Blue). Circle areas are proportional to haplotype frequency with the smallest circles representing singletons. The branch lengths are proportional to the number of STRs separating the nodes. (JPG 289 kb)
-
blah
439_2009_727_MOESM6_ESM.jpg
(422KB)
Figure S6. Decay of paternal lineages via genetic drift in a constant size population of 50 males. The graph shows 10,000 simulations of a population with N=50 for 160 generations. Each individual was given a unique number representing N distinct founding lineages. Initially, all males are assumed to carry a unique Y chromosome haplotypes. While this assumption is unrealistic, we note that it is conservative to the hypothesis that only a single haplotype survives after 160 generations (i.e., simulations starting with a random sample of haplotypes from a neutral population leads to more rapid fixation of a single male lineage). The black line is the average number of haplotypes in the population and the two dotted blue lines are the maximum and minimum number of haplotypes in the population. (JPG 422 kb)
-
blah
439_2009_727_MOESM7_ESM.jpg
(525KB)
Figure S7. Decay of paternal lineages via genetic drift in a constant size population of 100 males. Each individual was randomly assigned to a haplogroup, with the number of haplogroups varying from 2-10. Similar to Figure S1 except a constant population size of 100 Cohanim is assumed. Each line represents a different simulation assuming a starting number of haplogroups between 1 and 10. (JPG 525 kb)
-
blah
439_2009_727_MOESM8_ESM.doc
(118KB)
Supplementary material 8 (DOC 122 kb)
- Title
- Extended Y chromosome haplotypes resolve multiple and unique lineages of the Jewish priesthood
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
- Journal
-
Human Genetics
Volume 126, Issue 5 , pp 707-717
- Cover Date
- 2009-11
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00439-009-0727-5
- Print ISSN
- 0340-6717
- Online ISSN
- 1432-1203
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Additional Links
- Topics
- Industry Sectors
- Authors
-
- Michael F. Hammer (1) (2)
- Doron M. Behar (3)
- Tatiana M. Karafet (1)
- Fernando L. Mendez (2)
- Brian Hallmark (1)
- Tamar Erez (1)
- Lev A. Zhivotovsky (4)
- Saharon Rosset (5)
-
Karl Skorecki
(3)
(6)
- Author Affiliations
-
- 1. ARL Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA
- 2. Department of EEB, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA
- 3. Molecular Medicine Laboratory, Rambam Health Care Campus, 31096, Haifa, Israel
- 4. Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, Moscow, Russia
- 5. Department of Statistics and Operations Research, School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel
- 6. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, 31096, Haifa, Israel