Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

, Volume 135, Issue 7, pp 855–866

Gastric cancer in the era of molecularly targeted agents: current drug development strategies

Authors

    • The Medical Professorial Unit, Prince of Wales Medical SchoolUniversity of New South Wales
Review

DOI: 10.1007/s00432-009-0583-7

Cite this article as:
Arkenau, H. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2009) 135: 855. doi:10.1007/s00432-009-0583-7

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide with approximately one million cases diagnosed annually. Despite considerable improvements in surgical techniques, innovations in clinical diagnostics and the development of new chemotherapy regimens, the clinical outcome for patients with advanced gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ is generally poor with 5-year survival rates ranging between 5 and 15%. The understanding of cancer relevant events has resulted in new therapeutic strategies, particularly in developing of new molecular targeted agents. These agents have the ability to target a variety of cancer relevant receptors and downstream pathways including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR), the c-Met pathway, cell-cycle pathways, and down-stream signalling pathways such as the Akt-PI3k-mTOR pathway. In the era of new molecularly targeted agents this review focuses on recent developments of targeting relevant pathways involved in gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ.

Keywords

Molecularly targeted agentsGastric cancerGastroesophageal cancerGEJ

Introduction

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide with approximately one million cases diagnosed annually. Histopathologically and genetically, gastric cancer and cancer of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) are heterogeneous diseases influenced by gene-environment interactions resulting in activation of various molecular pathways. A number of specific molecular and genetic changes have been associated with histopathological features and biological behaviour (Tahara 2004). Based on the current knowledge of gastric cancer biology new targeted agents have been developed and are currently investigated in clinical trials.

Cell surface receptor inhibitors

EGFR inhibitors

The most extensively explored approach is the inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) using two different mechanisms: inhibition of the EGFR via monoclonal antibodies (i.e. cetuximab, matuzumab and panitumumab) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (i.e. gefitinib, erlotinib).

The epidermal growth factor receptor is a cell-surface receptor for members of the epidermal growth factor family (EGF-family) of extracellular protein ligands. Ligand binding to the extracellular domain leads to EGFR activation, which then homodimerizes, resulting in the phosphorylation of the intracellular tyrosine kinase initiating a series of intracellular signals including the central Ras/Raf/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) or the Akt/mTOR pathway (Carpenter and Cohen 1990).

Cetuximab is a recombinant, human/mouse chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the extracellular domain of the human EGFR on both normal and tumour cells, and competitively inhibits the binding of epidermal growth factor and other ligands, such as transforming growth factor-alpha. Additionally, cetuximab has also been shown to mediate antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC). The current approval status is for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) and squamous cell head and neck cancer (Saltz et al. 2004).

Cetuximab has been investigated in multiple phase II studies in patients with advanced gastric cancer alone or in combination with various chemotherapy regimens including irinotecan, cisplatin/docetaxel, FUFOX/FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, folinic acid) and FOLIFIRI (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, folinic acid). In heavily pre-treated patients single agent cetuximab resulted in low response rates of 5%; however, in combination with irinotecan a tumour control rate of 62% was achieved (Woell et al. 2008; Stein et al. 2007; Tebbutt et al. 2008). In untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ the combination of cetuximab with different chemotherapy backbones such as FUFOX/FOLFOX, cisplatin/docetaxel or FOLFIRI achieved tumour response rates between 44 and 62.5%. With these combinations time-to-progression (TTP) ranged between 5.5 and 8.0 months with an overall survival (OS) between 9.5 and 16 months. Serious cetuximab-related adverse events observed in all clinical trials were infusion reactions, skin toxicity, and diarrhea (Lordick et al. 2007; Han et al. 2009; Pinto et al. 2008; Pinto et al. 2007). Currently, there are phase III trials ongoing evaluating cetuximab in combination with various chemotherapy backbones (Tables 1, 2, 3).
Table 1

Cell surface receptor inhibitors in gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ

Cell surface receptor inhibitors in gastric cancer

Clinical trials, Phase

EGF-R

 Antibody

Cetuximab

III

Panitumumab

III

Matuzumab

I–II

 Receptor tyrosine kinase

Gefinitib

II

Erlotinib

II

HER2-R

 Antibody

Antibody

III

VEGF-R

  

 Antibodies

Bevacizumab (VEGF only)

III

 Receptor tyrosine kinase

Vatalanib

III

Semaxinib (SU5416)

Preclinical

IGF-R

 Antibody

CP-751,871

I–II

 Receptor tyrosine kinase

OSI 906

I

HGF/Met-R

 Antibody

AMG 102

I–II

 Receptor tyrosine kinase

GSK1363089 (XL880)

II

Arqule

I–II

FGF-R

 Receptor tyrosine kinase

Brivanib

II

Ki23057

Preclinical

 Dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor

  EGF/HER2-R

   Receptor tyrosine kinase

Lapatinib

II

BIBW 2992

II

  EGF/VEGF-R

   Receptor tyrosine kinase

Vadatenib

I–II

 Multi tyrosine kinase inhibitor

  Raf, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGFR-β

   Receptor tyrosine kinase

Sorafenib

II

  RET, VEGFR, PDGFR, Flt3, c-KIT

   Receptor tyrosine kinase

Sunitinib

II

Table 2

Cell cycle associated inhibitors and inhibitors of downstream signalling pathways in gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ

Cell cycle associated drug target inhibitors in gastric cancer

Clinical trials, Phase

Cyclin dependent Kinase (CDK)

 Flavopiridol

III

Matrix Metallo Proteinase (MMP)

 Marimastat

III

HSP 90

 17-AAG

Preclinical, I

HDAC

 Belinostat (PXD101)

Preclinical, I

Polo-like Kinase

 BI 2536

Preclinical, I

Downstream Signalling pathways

 Ubiquitine-Proteasome

  Bortezomib

II

 PI3 K-Akt-mTOR

  Everolismus (RA001)

II

Table 3

EGFR Antibody trials in combination with chemotherapy

EGFR Antibody trials in combination with chemotherapy

Reference

Line

N

Chemo

EGFR-AB

ORR (%)

TTP months

OS months

Toxicity Grade 3/4

Woell et al. (2008)

1st

40

Oxaliplatin/irinotecan

Cetuximab

NA

NA

NA

Neutropenia 17.5%

Diarrhea 12.5%

Rash 8%

Lordick et al. (2007)

1st

52

FUFOX

Cetuximab

62.5

7.6

9.5

Diarrhea 33%

Skin 24%

Fatigue 10%

Han et al. (2009)

1st

38

mFOLFOX6

Cetuximab

50

5.5

9.9

Neutropenia (NA)

Diarrhea (NA)

Rash (NA)

Pinto et al. (2008)

1st

48

Cisplatin/docetaxel

Cetuximab

40.5

At 3 months 80% no TTP

NA

Neutropenia 46%

Rash ≥ 231%

Asthenia 23%

Pinto et al. (2007)

1st

38

FOLFIRI

Cetuximab

44

8

16

Neutropenia 44%

Rash 21%

Diarrhea 8%

Stein et al. (2007)

Refractory

13

Irinotecan

Cetuximab

23

2.5

3.2

Neutropenia 23%

Rash 23%

Diarrhea 15%

Tebbutt et al. (2008)

Refractory

38

Docetaxel

Cetuximab

6

2.1

5.3

Anorexia 16%

Diarrhea 11%

Nausea 8%

NA not assessed, ORR overall response rate, TTP median time to tumour progression; OS median overall survival, FUFOX 5-FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin, mFOLFOX modified 5-FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin, FOLFIRI 5-FU/leucovorin/irinotecan

Matuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG1) targeting EGFR with high affinity, has been investigated with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced gastric and cancer of the GEJ. In a dose finding phase I study in 17 EGFR expressing patients disease control was achieved in 57% (4PR/2SD) at a dose level of 400 mg and 43% (3PR/2SD) at 800 mg matuzumab (Rao et al. 2008). Further exploration of this agent in phase II trials is planned.

Panitumumab is the first fully human monoclonal antibody (IgG2) specific to the EGFR. Clinical activity has been demonstrated in patients with EGFR positive advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) who failed standard therapies (Van Cutsem et al. 2007). A phase III trial (REAL III) is due to start investigating the role of panitumumab in combination with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer or adenocarcinoma of the GEJ.

Interestingly, clinical trials of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in gastric carcinoma have provided minimal evidence of efficacy in the first-line setting. A phase II study of gefitinib (250 mg/day or 500 mg/day) which included 75 patients demonstrated that only 18% with advanced gastric cancer achieved disease control (Rojo et al. 2006). Another trial investigated the role of erlotinib in 70 patients with advanced gastric cancer or cancer of the GEJ. In this trial the overall response rate was 9%, all occurring in GEJ cancer patients. In this trial the median OS was 6.7 months in GEJ patients and 3.5 months in patients with advanced gastric cancer (Dragovich et al. 2006). The authors concluded that erlotinib was active in patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma, but appeared inactive in gastric cancers.

Over-expression and amplification of HER2/ErbB2 has been described in 15–45% of gastric cancers and cancers of the GEJ resulting in a potential target for monoclonal antibodies (Trastuzumab) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Lapatinib) (Tanner et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2008). Lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR and HER2/ErbB2, was administered to 47 untreated advanced gastric cancer patients at a dose of 1,500 mg per os daily. Although lapatinib was well tolerated it had modest single-agent activity with a 12% response rate and 20% disease stabilization. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 2 months, and the OS was 5 months, respectively (Iqbal et al. 2007). Moreover, in previously treated patients with gastric or GEJ cancers lapatinib had limited single-agent activity with only two patients who experienced durable SD (Hecht et al. 2008). Another dual EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase is BIBW 2992 which has shown clinical activity in phase I trials in various cancers including cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. This compound is currently investigated in a phase II trial in patients harbouring tumours with EGFR and/or HER2 gene amplifications or EGFR activating mutations (Eskens et al. 2008).

Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody, which was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998 for the treatment of advanced breast cancer and later for early breast cancer (Hinoda et al. 2004). Preclinical data demonstrated that trastuzumab has activity in human gastric cancer cells lines that over-express HER2/ErbB2 (Gong et al. 2004). A small phase II trial investigated trastuzumab in 21 untreated patients with HER2/ErbB2 overexpressing/amplifying advanced gastric cancers. In this trial the overall response rate was 35% (1/5 CR/PR) and disease stabilization was 17%, amounting for 52% disease control (Cortés-Funes et al. 2007). Based on these promising results a phase III trial (TOGA-trial) is currently evaluating the role of trastuzumab +/− chemotherapy in patients with HER2/ErbB2 over-expressing/amplifying advanced gastric cancer. Of the 2,484 gastric cancer samples screened to date, 544 were HER2 positive and 1,940 HER2 negative, giving an overall HER2-positivity rate of 21.9%. Clinical results of this trial are awaited (Bang et al. 2008).

Antiangiogenic agents

Blood vessel formation via angiogenesis is one of the most crucial steps in progression of cancer from localized to metastatic disease. During tumourigenesis, the process of angiogenesis is markedly disordered and requires the continued production of stimulators by tumour and stromal cells in excess of inhibitors. Among pro-angiogenic stimulators, vascular endothelial growths factors (VEGF-family A-D) play a key role in both vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. The interaction of VEGF with its receptors leads to endothelial cell proliferation and new blood vessel formation in in vitro models of angiogenesis (Carmeliet 2003). And indeed, in patients with gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ the serum concentrations of VEG factors have shown a relationship between the serum concentration of VEGF and metastasis and/or poor outcome (Karayiannakis et al. 2002).

There are various strategies to inhibit tumour angiogenesis, and one of the most commonly studied targets is the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEFG receptors) via monoclonal antibodies or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A number of antiangiogenic agents have been investigated or are currently in clinical trials.

Bevacizumab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody, binds the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and prevents the interaction of VEGF to its receptors (Flt-1 and KDR) on the surface of endothelial cells. Bevacizumab was the first FDA-approved therapy designed to inhibit angiogenesis in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) and later non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal and breast cancer (Presta et al. 1997).

Clinical data of bevacizumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer or cancer of the GEJ are currently based on phase II experiences and therefore limited. The fact that there are various accepted standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ bevacizumab has been investigated with different chemotherapies in untreated patients.

In a small phase II trial 47 patients were treated with a combination of cisplatin, irinotecan and bevacizumab. This trial achieved a promising response rate of 67%, and after a median follow up of 9.0 months the TTP was 9.9 months with a median OS of 12.6 months. Despite those encouraging findings, there was concern about the incidence of thromboembolic events, which occurred in 25% of the patients (Shah et al. 2006). Additionally, another phase II study treated eight patients with a combination of oxaliplatin, docetaxel and bevacizumab. This regimen resulted in four partial responses and disease stabilization was observed in four patients. However, of concern were two gastrointestinal perforations (Hammad et al. 2008). Another phase II study investigated the role of the commonly used DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU) chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab. Out of 21 patients with gastric, GEJ or esophageal cancer (patients: 15:5:1) 71% achieved a partial response and 21% stable disease. After a 6-month median follow-up the median survival has not been reached yet. In this trial side effects included asymptomatic venous thromboembolism (29%) and one patient developed a grade 3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding (Jhawer et al. 2008). Less toxicity and also promising response rates were observed combining bevacizumab with 5-FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). Out of 16 patients (esophageal and GEJ/gastric cancer: 9/7) ten patients (63%) achieved a partial response and six patients (37%) achieved minor response or disease stabilization. The median TTP and OS were 7 and 8.9 months, respectively (Cohenuram and Lacy 2008). Unlike the above-mentioned studies there was no observed bevacizumab associated toxicity, such as arterial/venous thrombotic events (ATE, VTE), gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation.

Despite these promising results from phase II studies, all authors stated that bevacizumab should only be used in the context of clinical trials at this current stage until mature data from phase III trials become available.

A different approach in inhibiting the VEGF pathway includes tyrosine kinase inhibitors which are directed against the receptors of the VEGF, Flt-1 and Flk-1/KDR. This drug class comprises a variety of compounds, some of them specific to the VEGF receptors such as PTK787/ZK222584 (Vatalanib) or SU5416, and others that inhibit not only the VEGF receptor but also other tyrosine kinase receptors such as ZD6474 (vandetanib), sunitinib and sorafenib.

These compounds have been investigated in different cell lines and animal models including gastric cancer and carcinoma of the GEJ, but clinical data are currently limited. For example, the dual VEGFR and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD6474 showed in an orthotopic gastric cancer model inhibition of tumour growth, decrease in microvessel density and slow down in tumour cell proliferation. This compound is currently being investigated in a phase I/II trial in combination with oxaliplatin and docetaxel (McCarty et al. 2004). Sunitinib, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR, platelet derived growth factor (PDGFR), Kit, RET and Flt3 has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and resistant or imatinib intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) (Motzer et al. 2007). Preliminary results of a phase II study of 72 previously chemotherapy-treated patients with advanced gastric were promising. Of patients who received sunitinib, partial responses were achieved in two patients, and stable disease (SD) was achieved in 17 patients (12 with SD for >3 months and 3 for >6 months). Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months, with overall survival of 11.9 months (Bang et al. 2007). A recent preliminary report of a phase II study in 52 patients with chemo refractory metastatic gastric cancer reported good tolerability of sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks and 2 weeks rest) and disease control rates in 5 of 14 patients were encouraging (Moehler et al. 2009).

Sorafenib is a potent inhibitor of the Raf tyrosine kinase and of several other receptor tyrosine kinases including VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGFR-β. A phase II study including 44 patients with advanced gastric cancer or cancer of the GEJ investigated the combination of sorafenib with docetaxel and cisplatin. In this trial the objective response rate was 38.6%, including one complete response (CR 2.3%). The median PFS was 5.8 months, and the median OS 14.9 months. The authors are planning to test this combination in a phase III trial (Sun et al. 2008).

Dual inhibitors of the VEGF and EGFR pathway

There is a strong body of evidence that the combination of anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF treatment strategies have additive effects in preclinical tumour models. EGFR, HER2 and VEGF share common pathways, and EGFR activation induces VEGF expression in cancer cells and tumour associated tumour cells expressing EGFR (Tortora et al. 2008). Pro-angiogenic effects by EGFR activation might also occur in conditions of chronic inflammation through intermediates such as cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2) (Mann et al. 2005). Studies conducted with anti-EGFR drugs have shown a link between EGFR blockage and tumour induced anti-angiogenesis resulting in decreased microvessel density and reduced production of pro-angiogenic factors (Hirata et al. 2002). Since both pathways play an important role in patients with gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ the strategy of dual targeting is currently investigated in various trials.

Clinically, the anti EGFR-VEGF strategy has been investigated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). In these patients who failed standard chemotherapy treatments including oxaliplatin and irinotecan containing regimens the combination of irinotecan, cetuximab and bevaziumab resulted in significant superior outcome compared to irinotecan and cetuximab alone (Saltz et al. 2007). Despite promising preclinical and small clinical studies the results of two phase III trials in advanced CRC (PACCE and the CAIRO 2) were surprising, resulting in inferior outcome by using the double-targeting strategy in combination with firstline chemotherapy (Hecht et al. 2009; Tol et al. 2009). Whether these results were based on poor patient selection, drug administration schedules or drug interactions remains speculative and is currently under investigation.

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-IR) inhibitors

The receptor of the type I insulin-like growth factor (IGF-IR) is a cell membrane receptor which is activated by its ligands, IGF-1 and IGF-2. IGF-IR has been identified to play a critical role in malignant transformation, angiogenesis, metastasis and resistance to apoptosis. Increased expression of IGF-I or the IGF-IR has been documented in several malignancies including lung, breast, colon, prostate and cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract (Grimber and Cohen 2000).

A study of 87 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy demonstrated that 77% were expressing IGF-IR and this was correlated with poor clinical outcome. Additionally, this study showed a link between IGF-IR expression and co-expression (immunohistochemistry staining, IHC) of EGFR and HER2: 55% of tumours co-expressed IGF-IR and EGFR and all tumours which were HER2 positive (18%) expressed IGF-IR. Interestingly, for patients who showed a low expression of both, IGF-IR and EGFR, the OS was significantly longer compared to patients with a high expression rate (Matsubara et al. 2008). Despite the small number of patients in this trial, these findings are of interest and could indicate a potential role in co-targeting both receptors. Moreover, strong evidence is accumulating about cross-talk mechanisms between IGF-IR and EGFR. For example, one of the known mechanisms to promote resistance to anti-EGFR treatment is switching to the IGF-IR downstream pathway (Jones et al. 2006). Strategies of targeting the IGF-IR pathway include the use of neutralizing antibodies, IGF-IR antisense/siRNA and receptor tyrosine kinases. Clinically several phase I studies of monoclonal antibodies against IGF-IR and receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are indicating clinical activity in various tumour types and good tolerability (Haluska et al. 2007).

A phase I trial combining docetaxcel and the IGF-IR antibody CP-751,871 showed promising results in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancers (Attard et al. 2006).

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) inhibitors

The subgroup of scirrhous gastric cancer has the worst prognosis of all gastric cancers. Common features include invasive progression, fibrosis, high frequency of metastasis to the peritoneum or lymph nodes and clinically chemo-resistance. The poor prognosis is associated with amplification of K-sam-II which encodes for the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGF-R2) (Hattori et al. 1996).

Ki23057 is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the K-sam-II/FGF-R2 which competes with the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding site. KI23057 was investigated in five human gastric cell lines (mouse models) and mice injected with the scirrhous cancer cell lines (OCUM-2MD3) had significantly prolonged survival compared to non-scirrhous cancer cells (Nakamura et al. 2006). A recently published preclinical study investigated another tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ZD2171, with a broad inhibitory spectrum including VEGFR-1, VEGFR-3, and c-Kit. In cancers dependent on FGF-R signalling, like scirrhous gastric carcinoma, ZD2171 showed also inhibitory properties and therefore may provide clinical benefit for patients with this subgroup of gastric cancer. Ongoing phase II studies investigate the role of FGF-inhibition in gastric cancer patients.

c-Met inhibitors

The c-Met signalling pathway is implicated in a variety of human malignancies, such as colon, gastric, lung, head & neck, thyroid, and prostate cancers as well as sarcomas, haematological malignancies, melanoma, and central nervous system tumours. The proto-oncogene, c-Met, encodes the high-affinity receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) or scatter factor (SF). c-Met and HGF are each required for normal mammalian development and have been shown to be particularly important in cell migration, morphogenic differentiation, and organization of three-dimensional tubular structures as well as cell growth and angiogenesis (Maulik et al. 2002). Both are deregulated in various human cancers including gastric cancers and correlate with poor prognosis. The most common cause of activation of the c-met pathway in gastric and GEJ cancers is via amplification of the MET gene, with subsequent protein over-expression and kinase activation (Inoue et al. 2004). A study including 121 patients with advanced gastric cancer demonstrated that HGF and c-Met were significantly over-expressed in patients with liver metastases compared to patients without liver metastasis (Amemiya et al. 2002). Additionally, for patients with advanced gastric cancer, co-expression of c-Met and HER2 proteins have been associated with poorer survival compared with over-expression of either one (Nakajima et al. 2000).

There are several strategies by inhibiting this pathway including HGF/MET antibodies (e.g. AMG 102) and small molecules; however, clinical data for patients with gastric or GEJ cancers are currently limited.

Based on phase I trial results, GSK1363089 (XL880) a potent oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of c-Met and VEGFR2/KDR, is currently studied in a phase II study including patients with advanced poorly differentiated gastric cancer. Interim results of 12 evaluable patients showed a 20% decrease in tumour size at the first 8-week evaluation. Of these 12 patients, six remain on study (2 for >12 weeks, 4 for >8 weeks) and six had disease progression at <8 weeks (Jhawer et al. 2008). Another c-Met inhibitor is, ARQ197, which is currently trialled in phase I and II studies in upper gastrointestinal cancers. ARQ197 is a non ATP competitive drug and results of a phase I trial showed disease stabilization in 7 of 11 patients with prolonged stabilization for >32 weeks in five tumour types including gastric cancer (Yap et al. 2008).

Cell cycle associated drug targets

Aurora Kinase inhibitors

Aurora Kinases (A, B, and C) are serine/threonine kinases which regulate mitotic progression in various organisms and control centromere maturation, separation, mitotic entry, spindle formation and chromosome alignment. In normal cells the aurora kinase protein levels increase from G2 to M phase and are enriched at the centromere and mitotic spindle (Marumoto et al. 2002). Over-expression of aurora kinases A result in chromosomal instability in a variety of tumours including gastric carcinoma. A recent study could demonstrate that aurora kinase A over-expression in upper gastrointestinal cancers resulted in activation of the aurora A/Akt/hdm2 pathway demonstrating a potential role for regulating p53 and cancer cell survival (Dar et al. 2008). Additionally, aurora kinase A over-expression had an effect on inhibition of drug-induced apoptosis in various gastrointestinal cell lines providing these cells with a drug-resistant phenotype and survival properties (Kamada et al. 2004). Cells which over-express aurora kinase A prevent the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria and increased levels of cytochrome C lead to inactivation of caspases and thus protecting cells from apoptosis. Over-expression of aurora kinase A could therefore be a factor contributing to poor clinical outcome in patients with gastric and GEJ cancers (Macarulla et al. 2008). Currently various aurora tyrosine kinase inhibitors are under investigation in phase I-II trials and results are awaited.

Polo-like kinase inhibitors

Polo-like kinases are a family of four serine/threonine kinases which are involved in signal transduction pathways essential for various mitotic processes such as centrosome maturation and chromosome segregation.

PLK-1 is the most common isoform which has been studied so far and its over-expression is seen in various malignancies including gastric cancer (Takai et al. 2005). A recent study in patients with gastric cancer showed that PLK-1 over-expression was associated with lymph node metastasis and diffuse growth pattern. This study demonstrated that inhibition of PLK-1 expression results in mitotic arrest, induction of apoptosis and suppression of tumour growth (Weichert et al. 2006). Additionally, the inhibition of PLK-1 via small interferences RNA (siRNA) resulted in PLK-1 depletion, cdc2 activity, increased cyclin B expression and accumulation of gastric cancer cells at G2/M, improper mitotic spindle formation, and delayed chromosome separation. Moreover, PLK-1 depletion was associated with decreased proliferation, attenuated pro-caspase 3 levels and increased apoptosis (Jang et al. 2006). Currently different phase I trials evaluate the role of PLK inhibitors in various tumours including gastric and GEJ and esophageal cancer.

Cyclin dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitors

Cyclin dependent kinases comprise a group of protein kinases (cdk1–cdk9) which are involved in cell cycle regulation via the retinoblastoma product (Rb, tumour suppressor gene). Inactivation of the Rb-pathway is a result of either over-expression or amplification of cdk’s or down-regulation of negative factors such as endogenous cdk-inhibitors or mutations in the Rb gene product. In various malignancies, this pathway is deregulated resulting in a disturbed G1 to S phase of the cell cycle (Senderowicz 2000).

Flavopiridol is a synthetic flavonoid with strong inhibitory properties of cdks including cdk-1, cdk-2, cdk-4, cdk-7 and hypophosphorylation of Rb. In multiple cell lines flavopiridol induced apoptosis, inhibited angiogenesis, and increased the effects of chemotherapy by arresting the cell cycle in the G1 or G2/M transition phase (Wang 2001). In a phase I study comprising 38 advanced cancer patients flavopiridol was administered as a 72-h infusion and at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level of 40 mg/m² one patient with gastric cancer achieved a complete response lasting more than 48 months (Thomas et al. 2002). However, results of a phase II study in 16 patients with advanced gastric cancer showed no activity but increased toxicity (Schwartz et al. 2001). The authors recommended further development of this drug by using different schedules and in combination with cytotoxic agents.

Inhibitor of epigenetic changes

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors

Over the past years there is an increasing body of evidence that epigenetic silencing of tumour suppressor genes induced by over-expression of histone deacetylases (HDAC) plays a crucial role in carcinogenesis and recent developments in understanding the cancer cell cycle are providing large opportunities for developing new anti-cancer agents (Miremadi et al. 2007). In humans, 18 HDAC enzymes have been identified and categorized in three classes based on homology to yeast HDAC’s (Class I includes HDAC 1, 2, 3, and 8; Class II includes HDAC’s 4, 5, 6, and 9; Class III HDAC’s include the so called Sir2 family of deacetylases, which are not inhibited by compounds that inhibit class I and II HDAC’s) (Bolden et al. 2006).

In gastric cancer moderate to strong expression of HDAC2 was found in 44 (62%) out of a total of 71 tumours. Interestingly, HDAC2 expression appeared to be associated with tumour aggressiveness (Song et al. 2005). Another study revealed that high HDAC expression in gastric cancer was significantly associated with nodal spread and was additionally an independent prognostic marker for gastric cancer (Weichert et al. 2008).

HDAC inhibitors (HDACI) are under considerable exploration due to their potential role in reversing the silenced genes in transformed tumour cells by modulating transcriptional processes. HDACIs are known to induce cell-cycle arrest in G1 and/or G2, apoptosis in cancer cells, and to be relatively non-toxic to non-transformed cells (Marks and Jiang 2005). One of the most studied HDACIs is trichostatin A (TSA). In a trial using the gastric cancer cell lines BGC-823 and SGC-7901 TSA induced apoptosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Zou et al. 2008). Furthermore, administration of SK-7068, a novel hybrid synthetic HDAC inhibitor, in HDACI-sensitive gastric cancer cell lines induced cell cycle arrest predominantly in the G2/M phase. In these cells HDAC inhibition induced mitotic arrest and abnormal positioning of metaphasic gamma-tubulin followed by high levels of apoptotic cell death (Park et al. 2004). Another HDAC inhibitor is SAHA (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid) which induces prolongation or hyper-acetylation of various histones leading to induction of both p21 and p27, resulting in both G1 and G2/M cell cycle arrest. The increase in the G2/M population of cells treated with SAHA has been attributed to an increase in the percentage of G2 cells (Cheema et al. 2004). In patients with oesophago-gastric cancer a phase II trial is currently investigating the combination of FOLFIRI ± vorinostat (HDACI).

Down stream signalling inhibitors

Heat shock protein 90 (HSP 90) inhibitors

Heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 is a highly expressed molecular chaperone protein capable of sensing cellular stress. In cells, Hsp90 mediates the maturation and stability of a set of cancer-associated proteins, collectively referred to as “clients” including steroid receptors, epidermal growth factor receptor family members, IGFR, MET, Raf-1, AKT, Bcr-abl, mutant p53, cyclin-dependent kinase 4, and many other oncogenic molecules. These client proteins are involved in signal-transduction pathways, cell-cycle regulation, and apoptosis pathways commonly deregulated in cancer (Tsutsumi and Neckers 2007).

In gastric cancer HSP90 expression is increased and has a close relationship with occurrence and lymph node metastasis (Zuo et al. 2003). Down-regulation of Hsp90 could change cell cycle distribution and increase the drug sensitivity of tumour cells. A study in gastric cancer cell lines using the HSP 90 inhibitor geldanamycin, a derivate of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG), showed a reduction in constitutive and inducible activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, Akt, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and decreased nuclear HIF-1α protein (Lang et al. 2007). Additionally, EGFR, HER-2 and EGF-mediated VEGF secretion were down-regulated after Hsp90 inhibition. Currently there are several phase I/II studies ongoing which evaluate the use the HSP 90 inhibitors in various cancer entities.

Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway inhibitors

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway plays an important role in the degradation of cellular proteins and cell cycle control. Disturbance in the degradation of such proteins has profound effects on tumour growth, cell proliferation, and apoptosis (Mani and Gelmann 2005).

Bortezomib, a boronic acid dipeptide derivative, is a potent inhibitor of the proteasome and has prominent effects in vitro and in vivo against several solid tumours. In three gastric cancer cell lines (AZ521, MUGC-3 and MKN-45), bortezomib induced the suppression of tumour cell growth and apoptosis (Fujita et al. 2007). Furthermore, the combination of bortezomib with cisplatin and docetaxel displayed dramatically increased tumour cell growth suppression compared to single drug treatment alone (Bae et al. 2008).

In a phase II trial including 44 patients with advanced gastric cancer, 28 chemo-naive patients (Arm A) received irinotecan in combination with bortezomib and 12 patients who were pre-treated received bortezomib alone (Arm B). Preliminary results of this trial showed response rates of 44% in arm A and 9% in arm B. The PFS and OS were 1.9 months and 5.4 months in arm A and 1.4 months and 4.1 months in arm B, respectively (Ocean et al. 2007). Further evaluation of this agent in combination with other chemotherapy backbones is ongoing.

PI3k/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitors

Another important pathway involved in gastric carcinogenesis is the intracellular signalling machinery of the PI3 Kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3 K/Akt/mTOR) downstream pathway. Events resulting in mTOR activation involve loss of PTEN function, mutation or amplification of the PI3 K, amplification of Akt, and inactivation or mutations of Akt-associated mTOR-regulatory proteins (Morgensztern and McLeod 2005).

A reduction or abnormal PTEN expression indirectly stimulates PI3K activity thereby contributing to oncogenesis. Abnormal expression of the PTEN protein is found to be infrequent in gastric cancer (11%) and is related to tumour differentiation, infiltrating depth, lymph node metastasis, pTMN staging and chemo-resistance (Oki et al. 2005).

In gastric cancer activated Akt (29%) promotes cell proliferation, growth and survival and other processes involved in cancer development by phosphorylating various intracellular proteins. Preclinical models showed that phospho-Akt1 was over-expressed in human gastric cancers and its levels correlated with tumour differentiation and pTNM (Han et al. 2008). Of particular interest among the Akt targets is the downstream effector mTOR. With the involvement of the PI3K-Akt pathway, mTOR releases signals to translational regulators, specifically enhancing the translation of mRNAs encoding proteins essential for cell growth and cell cycle progression through G1 to S phase. As a result of its central position within this downstream pathway, mTOR has been considered an important target for new anticancer drug development (Lang et al. 2007).

RAD001 (everolimus) is an oral mTOR inhibitor and has shown anti-cancer activity in in vitro and in vivo models of gastric cancer (Cejka et al. 2008). To evaluate the activity and safety of single agent RAD001, a multi-centre phase II study for pre-treated patients with advanced gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ is currently ongoing and preliminary results showed that out of 17 evaluable patients 10 patients achieved SD lasting more than 8 weeks. Generally this treatment was well tolerated with manageable side effects (Muro et al. 2008).

There are currently several phase I trials ongoing that investigate the role of PI3-kinase and AKT-inhibitors in various tumour types.

Other mechanisms

COX inhibitors

Cyclooxygenase is the most important regulator of prostaglandin synthesis which catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid into prostaglandin H2 (PGH2) a precursor of prostaglandins, prostacyclins, and thromboxanes (Kuwano et al. 2004).

There is epidemiologic evidence that helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection plays an important role in gastric and GEJ carcinogenesis. Chronic infection by H. pylori leads to increased cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), inducible nitric oxide synthetase (iNOS) and cytokines expression (Lax and Thomas 2002). Additionally, over-expression of COX2 increases the production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), BCL2 and reduces the tumour growth factor 2 (TGF2) receptor expression and E-cadherin protein. Furthermore, COX2 can induce angiogenesis via VEGF and b fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) expression, and increases the metastatic potential by up-regulation of uPA and matrix-metallo-proteinase 2 (MMP2). These changes result in an increased tumourigenic potential and supports the hypothesis that COX2 over-expression plays a key role in the cancer transformation process (Iwamoto et al. 2008).

Numerous preclinical studies have indicated that the inhibition of COX2 by non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) results in inhibition of gastric cancer cell formation and growth. A meta-analysis of observational studies showed an association between long term NSAID use and the reduced risk of gastric cancer (Wang et al. 2003). Despite these findings there remain various unanswered questions by using cyclooxygenase inhibitors in clinical practice including the optimal dosing and timing, e.g. chemoprevention and the duration of treatment.

Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors

Matrix metalloproteinases are a family of zinc-dependent enzymes involved in degradation of extracellular matrix (gelatinases, collagenases, stromelysins) and play a key role for metastasis and angiogenesis. The enzymatic activity contributes to the degradation of the basal membrane and extracellular matrix, and therefore enables local tumour growth and angio-invasion (Cauwe et al. 2007). In patients with gastric cancer several MMPs are over-expressed (MMP2, MMP 7, MMP 9 and MMP14) and associated with poor clinical survival. Recently, plasma levels of MMP 9 were found to be a prognostic marker for the clinical outcome for patients with gastric cancer (de Mingo et al. 2007). Despite intensive research in the field of MMP inhibition most clinical trials of MMP inhibitors (MMPIs) resulted in negative results.

The oral MMPI, Marimastat (BB 2516, TA 2516), demonstrated in a mouse xenograft model shrinkage of peritoneal disease using the human gastric cancer cell line TMK-1. Furthermore, marimastat decreased the tumour growth in mice injected with MGLVA1 human gastric tumours (Wada et al. 2003). In the clinical setting a phase I study of marimastat showed an acceptable safety profile in 35 patients with advanced GC or carcinoma of the GEJ. Despite any radiological responses a significant number of patients where control endoscopies were performed showed increased fibrotic cover of the tumour (32%) and a reduction in tumour haemhorrage was seen in 26% of patients (Tierney et al. 1999). Based on these results a phase III trial investigated the role of marimastat versus placebo in patients with advanced gastric cancer and carcinoma of the GEJ. 396 patients who had received no more than a single regimen of 5-FU based chemotherapy were randomized to receive either marimastat or placebo. This trial showed significant improvement in the 2-year OS (9% vs. 3%) in the marimastat cohort; however, this study did not meet its endpoint to show an OS difference (P = 0.07). Interestingly, the subgroup of pre-treated patients had a significantly prolonged survival compared to patients who were treatment naïve (8.4 months vs. 5.8 months, P = 0.045). Due to a poor tolerability (musculoskeletal toxicity) this drug was not further developed in this setting (Bramhall et al. 2002). The clinical development of another oral MMP-inhibitor, Prinomastat (reversible, selective inhibitor of MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, MMP-13 and MMP-14), was omitted due to an unfavourable toxicity profile (Zucker et al. 2000).

Future perspectives

Despite advances in clinical diagnostics, surgical techniques, improvement of chemo- and radiotherapy regimens the prognosis of gastric cancer remains poor and the need for novel treatment options is urgent.

In recent years the understanding of cancer biology has improved and resulted in the development of new molecular targeted agents with the potential to suppress key pathways involved in carcinogenesis. These findings open new possibilities to apply ‘targeted therapy’ for patients with gastric cancer. And indeed, there are currently several promising examples and future studies will incorporate these agents either as single, multi-targeted approach or in combination with accepted chemotherapy backbones.

However, to avoid unnecessary drug development failure and immense costs associated with it we have to re-think our current drug development strategies.

Given the diversity of molecular changes acquired during malignant transformation there is often no single neoplastic pathway responsible. Molecular profiling will therefore play a crucial role to test for the relevant target or pathway, and moreover to validate whether the target is inhibited or functionally of importance. Also, to identify the right patient population molecular-based population enrichment will play a crucial role, especially in early clinical trials.

Additionally, the fact that molecularly targeted agents often result only in prolonged disease stabilization rather than tumour shrinkage is a great challenge. The way clinical trials for targeted agents are designed will therefore change, especially in the phase II setting, where ‘randomized phase II’ and ‘randomized discontinuation trials’ will become more apparent. These new trial designs may help to identify relevant tumour subgroups benefiting from treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau has no conflict of interest.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009