Determination of serum antibodies against swine-origin influenza A virus H1N1/09 by immunofluorescence, haemagglutination inhibition, and by neutralization tests: how is the prevalence rate of protecting antibodies in humans?
- Regina AllwinnAffiliated withInstitute of Medical Virology, University Hospital
- , Janina GeilerAffiliated withInstitute of Medical Virology, University Hospital
- , Annemarie BergerAffiliated withInstitute of Medical Virology, University Hospital
- , J. CinatlAffiliated withInstitute of Medical Virology, University Hospital
- , H. W. DoerrAffiliated withInstitute of Medical Virology, University Hospital Email author
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In April 2009, a new variant of influenza A virus, subtype H1N1v emerged in Mexico and spread all over the world producing the H1N1 pandemic in mankind after 1918–1920 and 1978/1979. Obviously there was no herd immunity against this new virus variant. Mainly young people, but less elderly were affected and presented severe and even lethal courses of disease. Since virus-specific antibodies are commonly regarded as markers of partial or complete immunoprotection, we performed antibody determinations in serum samples obtained from people before and after the pandemic has arrived in our region (Frankfurt/M., Germany). The assays were done by indirect immunofluorescence, by neutralization test, and by a haemagglutination inhibition test (HI), which was established in a practical modification for general and easy use. Among 145 individuals, of whom serum specimens had been drawn before the onset of pandemic, 19 revealed humoral immunity, i.e. titres of H1N1v neutralizing antibodies (at least 1:64). Eleven were older than 60 years, one belonged to the age group 40–59 years, three to the age group 20–39 years, and two to the age group 15–19 years. After the onset of pandemic in Frankfurt, serum specimens drawn from n = 225 randomly selected patients of our local university hospital were investigated for antibodies against H1N1v by HI, which is generally recommended for routine check of immunity. Twenty-eight individuals revealed the protecting antibody titre of at least 1:40. The age distribution had moved to mean age groups. The results fit to the incidence of influenza A/H1N1(09) disease, as confirmed by RT–PCR in patients admitted to our hospital, peaking in the younger age groups up to 30 years (second affected group: 30–40 years). While commonly used solid-phase antibody tests (like immunofluorescence) are not suitable to diagnose passed H1N1(09) infection and acquired immunity, this can be easily done by HI. Expecting the next waves of influenza A/H1N1v infections, HI testing may avoid vaccinations under special risk of severe or hidden adverse reactions.
KeywordsH1N1 pandemic Seroprevalence Immunity
- Determination of serum antibodies against swine-origin influenza A virus H1N1/09 by immunofluorescence, haemagglutination inhibition, and by neutralization tests: how is the prevalence rate of protecting antibodies in humans?
Medical Microbiology and Immunology
Volume 199, Issue 2 , pp 117-121
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- H1N1 pandemic
- Industry Sectors