Date: 04 Aug 2013
Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?
- János Horváth
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer unique insights into processes related to involuntary attention changes triggered by rare, unpredictably occurring sensory events, that is, distraction. Contrasting ERPs elicited by distracters and frequent standard stimuli in oddball paradigms allowed the formulation of a three-stage model describing distraction-related processing: first, the distracting event is highlighted by a sensory filter. Second, attention is oriented towards the event, and finally, the task-optimal attention set is restored, or task priorities are changed. Although this model summarizes how distracting stimulus information is processed, not much is known about the cost of taking this exceptional route of processing. The present study demonstrates the impact of distraction on sensory processing. Participants performed a Go/NoGo tone-duration discrimination task, with infrequent pitch distracters. In the two parts of the experiment the duration-response mapping was reversed. Contrasts of distracter and standard ERPs revealed higher P3a- and reorienting negativity amplitudes for short than for long tones, independently from response type. To understand the cause of these asymmetries, short vs. long ERP contrasts were calculated. The ERP pattern showed that short standards elicited an attention-dependent offset response, which was abolished for short distracters. That is, the apparent P3a- and RON enhancements were caused by the removal of a task-related attentional sensory enhancement. This shows that the disruption of task-optimal attention set precedes the elicitation of the P3a, which suggests that P3a does not reflect a process driving the initial distraction-related attention change.
Escera, C., & Corral, M.-J. (2003). The distraction potential (DP), an electrophysiological tracer of involuntary attention control and its dysfunction. In Reinvang, I., Greenlee, M. W., & Herrmann, M. (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of individual differences (pp. 63–76). Bibliotheksund Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg, Oldenberg, Germany.
Horváth, J., & Winkler, I. (2010). Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task. Biological Psychology, 83(3), 229–238. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.004.
Horváth, J., Roeber, U., Bendixen, A., & Schröger, E. (2008). Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events. Brain Research, 1229, 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.096.
Ljungberg, J. K., Parmentier, F. B. R., Leiva, A., & Vega, N. (2012). The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1461–1468. doi:10.1037/a0028149.PubMedCrossRef
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: a user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nuwer, M. R., Comi, G., Emerson, R., Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A., Guérit, J.-M., Hinrichs, H., Ikeda, A., Luccas, F. J. C., Rappelsburger, P. (1998). IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 106(3), 259–261.
Wetzel, N., Schröger, E., & Widmann, A. (2013). The dissociation between the P3a event-related potential and behavioral distraction. Psychophysiology. doi:10.1111/psyp.12072 (in press).
- Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?
Volume 78, Issue 3 , pp 339-348
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Additional Links
- János Horváth (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, RCNS, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O.B. 398, Szondi u 83/85, 1394, Budapest, Hungary