Evidence for sex differences in cardiovascular aging and adaptive responses to physical activity
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Parker, B.A., Kalasky, M.J. & Proctor, D.N. Eur J Appl Physiol (2010) 110: 235. doi:10.1007/s00421-010-1506-7
- 505 Views
There are considerable data addressing sex-related differences in cardiovascular system aging and disease risk/progression. Sex differences in cardiovascular aging are evident during resting conditions, exercise, and other acute physiological challenges (e.g., orthostasis). In conjunction with these sex-related differences—or perhaps even as an underlying cause—the impact of cardiorespiratory fitness and/or physical activity on the aging cardiovascular system also appears to be sex-specific. Potential mechanisms contributing to sex-related differences in cardiovascular aging and adaptability include changes in sex hormones with age as well as sex differences in baseline fitness and the dose of activity needed to elicit cardiovascular adaptations. The purpose of the present paper is thus to review the primary research regarding sex-specific plasticity of the cardiovascular system to fitness and physical activity in older adults. Specifically, the paper will (1) briefly review known sex differences in cardiovascular aging, (2) detail emerging evidence regarding observed cardiovascular outcomes in investigations of exercise and physical activity in older men versus women, (3) explore mechanisms underlying the differing adaptations to exercise and habitual activity in men versus women, and (4) discuss implications of these findings with respect to chronic disease risk and exercise prescription.
KeywordsGender differencesCardiorespiratory fitnessExerciseCardiovascular risk
There is growing awareness on the part of both investigators and clinicians about sex-related differences in cardiovascular aging and disease risk/progression in humans, as demonstrated by a number of recent reviews on these topics (Baylis 2009; Fu et al. 2008; Meyer et al. 2008; Ostadal et al. 2009; Huxley 2007; McBride et al. 2005). Sex differences in cardiovascular system aging are evident at rest, during acute physiological challenges (exercise, orthostasis, environmental stress), and in response to pharmacological drug infusions. In addition, there appear to be differences between the sexes in the plasticity of various cardiovascular system components and risk factors in response to chronic physical activity and exercise with advancing age. This heterogeneity between aging women and men is evident in the aerobic exercise-induced adaptive responses of the heart (Spina et al. 1996), the arterial vasculature (Black et al. 2009; Martin et al. 1991; Parker et al. 2007, 2008), and autonomic control of the circulation (Fu et al. 2008; Ridout et al. 2010). Differences in the responsiveness of the cardiovascular system to physical activity and exercise in men versus women may in fact underlie some of the observed sex differences in cardiovascular aging. While the possible mechanisms contributing to such sex-related differences in cardiovascular adaptability and disease risk invariably include age-related alterations in sex hormones (particularly the loss of estrogen in women), the role of other factors such as baseline fitness and physical activity levels and differing dose–response relationships in women and men are also important to consider. The primary purpose of the present paper is to review findings from investigations of cardiovascular system aging and adaptation in older adults. Recognition of sex differences in cardiovascular aging, adaptability, and disease/dysfunction has important implications for understanding the biology of aging, and for the development of interventions (perhaps sex-specific) to ameliorate cardiovascular deconditioning and disease progression.
Observed age differences in the cardiovascular system between the sexes
Changes in certain cardiac and autonomic characteristics are sex-specific in older adults; specifically, older women appear to exhibit greater declines in these resting parameters that may augment their cardiovascular disease risk. For example, a recent study of 1,333 healthy individuals (ages 10–89) free of heart disease and hypertension revealed that peak early mitral annular velocity (E′) deteriorates more significantly with age in women than in men (Okura et al. 2009). A reduced E′ reflects reduced left ventricular relaxation (i.e., impaired diastolic filling) and is correlated with decreased exercise capacity in both healthy adults as well as patients with cardiovascular disease (Okura et al. 2000; Terzi et al. 2007). Authors of the study speculated that the greater age-related decline observed in older women could explain in part sex differences in cardiovascular disease risk and the greater number of cardiovascular deaths in U.S. women than men (Rosamond et al. 2008). Similarly, it is well-documented that muscle sympathetic nerve activity increases to a greater extent with age in women than men, and this finding has also been proposed as a factor contributing to the greater influence of advancing age on hypertension and cardiovascular disease progression in women (Matsukawa et al. 1998; Narkiewicz et al. 2005). Lipsitz et al. (2006; Sevre et al. 2001) also found evidence for increased sympathetic activation during an orthostatic challenge, as elderly hypertensive women demonstrate greater systemic vascular resistance and low-frequency systolic pressure variability (an indicator of sympathetic vascular control) during tilt. The relationship between impaired autonomic function and hypertension in older women has also been observed with studies of baroreflex responsiveness, as Sevre et al. (2001) observed that middle-aged hypertensive women—but not men—exhibited reduced cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity, which was correlated to a higher systolic blood pressure. Recently, Fu et al. (2008; Lloyd-Jones et al. 2005) reviewed these three studies and proposed that these sex differences in autonomic function could be a potential mechanism underlying the higher prevalence of hypertension in older women. These collective resting data indicate that older women exhibit greater declines in indices of both cardiac and autonomic cardiovascular function, which may contribute to the greater cardiovascular morbidity and mortality observed in older postmenopausal women.
Exercising central hemodynamics
There are also sex differences in the effect of age on central (i.e., cardiac and pressor) responses to large muscle mass dynamic exercise. For example, Weiss et al. (2006) reported that maximal cardiac output decreases more steeply in the later decades (ages 60–90) in older men (>age 60) than older women, as the slope of the decrease in cardiac output is over two-fold higher in older men versus women. A similar trend was observed with respect to maximal oxygen uptake in the same study. Similarly, Goldspink et al. (2009) reported that maximal cardiac power output and reserve decrease by 20–25% in men across the ages 20–75, correlating with a similar (~21%) decrease in left ventricular mass, whereas the same variables are preserved in aging women. In contrast, older women exhibit an exaggerated pressure response to exercise relative to their younger counterparts (Ogawa et al. 1992) that has also been observed during small muscle mass leg exercise (Martin et al. 1991; Parker et al. 2008). This exaggerated pressor response is not as pronounced in older men.
Exercising peripheral hemodynamics
Our laboratory has noted sex differences in peripheral hemodynamic responses to leg exercise. Although leg blood flow and vascular conductance responses during graded leg cycling exercise are reduced with age in both chronically endurance-trained (Proctor et al. 1998; Wahren et al. 1974) or very sedentary (Beere et al. 1999; Lawrenson et al. 2003) men, we have reported that normally active older men (i.e., men who are neither extremely sedentary nor highly trained, as defined by oxygen uptake values falling within the 20–80th percentile of age- and sex-specific norms) do not exhibit attenuated leg blood flow responses when compared with young men. However, a demographically similar group of normally active older women demonstrated blunted leg hyperemic and vascular conductance responses relative to their young counterparts during the same mode of submaximal exercise (Proctor et al. 2003). We confirmed evidence of an age–sex interaction in the leg hyperemic response to dynamic exercise in normally active adults utilizing an exercise model not thought to be limited by age-related reductions in the central pumping capacity of the heart. Specifically, during single leg knee extensor exercise, older women, but not men, exhibit blunted hyperemic and vasodilator responses to graded exercise relative to their young counterparts, a finding not explained solely by age-associated differences in quadriceps muscle mass or the mechanics of the knee extensor exercise model (Parker et al. 2007, 2008). Interestingly, Goldspink et al. (2009) recently reported the opposite trend with respect to forearm hyperemic responses, as authors reported a greater decrease in peak reactive hyperemic forearm blood flow in older men than women. Unfortunately, to date, there is substantial heterogeneity in the effect of human aging alone on peripheral hemodynamic responses to exercise. That is, leg blood flow during knee extensor exercise is reduced with age in completely sedentary men (Lawrenson et al. 2003) while forearm hemodynamic responses to handgrip exercise are well preserved with age in normally active men (Donato et al. 2006; Jasperse et al. 1994), both findings in contrast to the work presented above. This disparity in the literature on men limits our ability at present to discern whether there exist fundamental differences in the impact of biological aging on blood flow to exercising muscle between women and men, especially when the effect of training status and chronic activity are taken into account.
Balance between central and peripheral hemodynamics
Vascular responses to non-exercise stimuli
Finally, while there are well-documented sex differences in young adults in responses to intra-arterial infusions of vasodilators and vasoconstrictors (Kneale et al. 1997, 2000), similar findings have only recently been established in older adults. Stauffer et al. measured forearm blood flow responses to infusions of the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 as well as endothelin A and B (ETA and ETB, respectively) receptor antagonists in middle-aged and older men and women. Older men demonstrated significantly greater dilation to the ETA receptor antagonist, suggesting that men are under greater ETA-mediated vasoconstrictor tone than older women (Stauffer et al. 2010). This finding is particularly relevant given that ETA is the predominant endothelin receptor subtype located in the coronary vasculature, perhaps contributing to sex differences in coronary artery disease. It also suggests that age-related changes in vasoconstrictor tone and the regulation of peripheral vascular resistance are sex-specific in older adults, given the work presented in previous paragraphs regarding heightened sympathetic nervous system activation in older women in contrast to the augmented influence of ETA in older men.
Evidence for a sex-specific modulatory influence of fitness and physical activity on the cardiovascular system
Emerging cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence suggests that just as the effect of age on the cardiovascular system differs in men versus women, the influence of acute and chronic physical activity on modifying certain biomarkers of cardiovascular aging also demonstrates sex-specificity in older humans. With respect to resting cardiovascular outcomes, for example, Wilund et al. reported an inverse association between VO2 max and the number of coronary artery calcified lesions in older men but not older women, and in the same investigation, fetuin-A, a systemic inhibitor of coronary calcification, was positively correlated with VO2 max in older men but again not in older women. In contrast, Havlik et al. (2005) found that increased walking frequency measured over a 24-month period in the Activity Counseling Trial was predictive of reduced aortic pulse wave velocity, an index of arterial stiffness, in older women but not in men. The authors hypothesized that there might be a threshold effect of walking on pulse wave velocity such that the lower fitness of the older women relative to older men at the beginning of the study placed women in a specific range of central vascular adaptability. Collier (2008) also reported that 4 weeks of resistance training lowered resting diastolic blood pressure to a greater extent in middle-aged, hypertensive women than men. Interestingly, other age-related structural vascular characteristics, such as increased carotid artery compliance and femoral artery intima-medial thickness, appear beneficially influenced by chronic aerobic fitness in both men and women (Moreau et al. 2006a, b; Tanaka et al. 1998, 2000). However, it is notable that even in these latter studies that have shown favorable effects of chronic aerobic fitness on cardiovascular outcomes, the magnitude of the effect may be sex-dependent. For example, Moreau et al. (2006a, b) found that age-associated increase in IMT was 33% smaller in endurance-trained compared with sedentary men, whereas the magnitude of the effect of chronic physical activity was half as great in older women (i.e., IMT was 15% smaller in endurance-trained compared with sedentary postmenopausal women). In contrast, Tanaka and colleagues (Tanaka et al. 1998, 2000) observed that habitual physical activity abolished age-related differences in central arterial stiffness in older women but only attenuated the effect of age on carotid compliance in older men.
Exercising central hemodynamics
Exercising peripheral hemodynamics
Vascular responses to non-exercise stimuli
Finally, there is very recent evidence indicating that vascular responses to non-exercise stimuli are influenced by chronic exercise differentially in older men versus women. Black et al. (2009) investigated conduit artery vasodilation (with brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, or FMD) in response to 5 min forearm ischemia in both sedentary and fit older men and women relative to young controls. Interestingly, fitness did not distinguish between conduit dilator responses in men, whereas older sedentary women exhibited significantly lower brachial artery dilator function than older fit women or young women. Moreover, exercise training resulted in a beneficial training adaptation (i.e., improved brachial vasodilation) in older sedentary women only. Older sedentary men did not respond to exercise training with improved FMD. It should be noted that these findings are in contrast to published data from very young adults and older men only. Pahkala et al. (2008) found that the chronic physical activity was directly associated with brachial artery flow-mediated dilation in Finnish adolescent boys but not girls, but attributed the lack of association in girls to the lower chronic physical activity levels of the female study population rather than to a true sex difference per se. Similarly, Wray et al. found that FMD is augmented by exercise training in older men when there is a baseline deficit in dilation (Wray et al. 2006); similar results were observed with respect to endothelium-dependent dilation in response to acetylcholine infusions in older men before and after exercise training (DeSouza et al. 2000). These heterogenous results raise the possibility that the effect of fitness on vascular responses to non-exercise stimuli are dependent on both sex and the magnitude of the initial (i.e., baseline) vasodilatory response in older adults.
Possible explanations for sex-dependent adaptive responses to physical activity with advancing age
Differences in cardiovascular regulation between the sexes
There are fundamental sex differences in vascular responsiveness and cardiovascular regulation, which could explain some of the heterogeneous adaptive responses to physical activity and exercise training between women and men. For example, young women exhibit augmented brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (Levenson et al. 2001; Sarabi et al. 1999) and beta-adrenergic mediated forearm vasodilation (Kneale et al. 2000) relative to young men. Moreover, the forearm vasodilatory response to acetylcholine (Dietz 1999) as well as peak calf reactive hyperemia (Proctor et al. 2005; Ridout et al. 2005) tend to be higher in women, while the forearm vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine (Bowyer et al. 2001; Kneale et al. 2000) and calf vasoconstrictor response to cold pressor and isometric handgrip maneuvers (Hogarth et al. 2007) are blunted in women relative to men. It has also been reported that plasma catecholamine responses to small muscle isometric exercise are greater in men (Gustafson and Kalkhoff 1982), as are metaboreflex responses (i.e., increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity) to handgrip exercise (Ettinger et al. 1996). Sex differences in adrenergic/vasodilator receptor density, sympathetic vascular transduction, and downstream signaling in the vasculature (Keys et al. 2005; Kneale et al. 2000) could underlie attenuated vaoconstrictor responses in women when compared with men. Young women also exhibit less effective baroreflex buffering of blood pressure than men (Christou et al. 2005) as well as reduced sympathetic nerve activity responses to head-up tilt (Shoemaker et al. 2001). With such widespread evidence of sex differences in vasoregulatory and autonomic balance, as well as arterial compliance (Debasso et al. 2004; van der Heijden-Spek et al. 2000), it is not surprising that the integrative mechanisms by which systemic blood pressure is regulated, both at rest (Hart et al. 2009) and during acute whole body exercise (Adams et al. 1987; Astrand and Rodahl 1974; Ridout et al. 2010; Wiebe et al. 1998), differ between women and men.
Collectively, this large body of evidence supports the hypothesis that sex differences in a host of cardiovascular variables at rest and in response to acute exercise evoke a differential balance of regulatory challenges for the cardiovascular system of aging women compared to men; over the course of a training period (short- or long-term) this could contribute to the heterogeneous effects of fitness and/or physical activity on cardiovascular outcomes in older adults. In addition, the sex differences in cardiovascular aging presented earlier in this review (e.g., marked increase in sympathetic activation, reduction in diastolic filling and autonomic dysfunction observed in older women) could also interact with the acute response to exercise to further exaggerate sex-specificity of short- and long-term responses to physical activity on cardiovascular aging in older adults.
Influence of sex hormones
The differential exposure to male and female sex hormones could also contribute to the potential sex-specificity of both cardiovascular aging and its modulation by acute and chronic physical activity. Certainly, the influence of female sex hormones in young women and the relatively abrupt cessation of their production at menopause have been shown to have a significant influence on both systemic and local indicators of cardiovascular function. For example, carotid artery stiffness, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, blood pressure, and cholesterol increase following menopause (Izumi et al. 2006; Peters et al. 1999; Takahashi et al. 2005). In addition, myriad studies have provided evidence that estrogen and progesterone contribute to a cardioprotective phenotype in young women (Vitale et al. 2009). Similarly, testosterone contributes beneficially to cardiovascular function in men (Maggio and Basaria 2009) and the reduction in testosterone associated with age has been correlated to diminished myocardial perfusion and augmented vascular stiffness (Webb et al. 2008). Interestingly, there is an interaction between recreational physical activity and steroid hormones in postmenopausal women such that higher physical activity is associated with lower levels of steroid hormone levels (both testosterone and estradiol) in postmenopausal women (Bertone-Johnson et al. 2009; Chan et al. 2007; McTiernan et al. 2006). In contrast, in men, higher levels of physical activity are positively associated with total and free testosterone (Shiels et al. 2009). Therefore, it is possible that the modulation of the cardiovascular system by physical activity in older adults is in part affected by endogenous levels of sex hormones that differ between men and women.
Sex-specific dose–response of exercise and cardiovascular adaptation
An alternative explanation for sex-specific adaptations of the cardiovascular system to fitness and physical activity is that different acute and/or chronic doses of exercise are required to evoke certain cardiovascular adaptations in men versus women. For example, a recent review by Milne and Noble (2008) presented the hypothesis that the acutely cardioprotective phenotype of young women may in fact necessitate bouts of higher-intensity exercise to evoke chronic myocardial benefits with respect to the heat shock protein hsp70. Moreover, an investigation of the common femoral artery shear rate response to exercise from our laboratory found that both young and older women exhibited a greater rise in shear rate across increasing knee extensor work rates than young or older men (Gonzales et al. 2009). We postulated that this sex difference could have implications for the vascular adaptability to exercise training in men and women. Similarly, Proctor et al. (2001) showed a significant effect of gender on several adaptations to a 9–12 week aerobic exercise training protocol in young adults. Specifically, young men did not exhibit changes in resting or exercising cardiac output following training, whereas women demonstrated reduced cardiac outputs both at rest and during exercise. Conversely, exercise-induced reductions in splanchnic blood flow with training were significantly less following training in men but not women. Collectively, these data raise the possibility that the dose of either acute or chronic physical activity required to affect specific cardiovascular parameters or cellular adaptive pathways may differ in men and women, and could in part underlie sex differences in exercise-induced cardiovascular plasticity.
Implications: sex-specific modulation of chronic disease by physical activity and inactivity
Implications: exercise prescription
Regular physical activity is widely recommended as a non-pharmacological means of combating age-related changes in body composition, losses of functional capacity, and reducing the risk or delaying the development of chronic degenerative conditions. Exercise guidelines for improving cardiovascular health and reducing the risk of cardiovascular events in previously sedentary middle-aged and older adults generally emphasize moderately intense, large muscle mass activities such as regular walking and/or leg cycling at a brisk pace. Such aerobic exercise prescriptions have proven effective in favorably modifying certain cardiovascular parameters (resting systolic blood pressure, central artery compliance, peak exercise capacity and O2 uptake) (Chodzko-Zajko et al. 2009; DeSouza et al. 2000; Tanaka et al. 2000). However, sex differences in the magnitude of certain cardiovascular adaptations to exercise may make the standard exercise prescription less effective for optimizing cardiovascular health uniformly in men and women. For example, maximal cardiac stroke volume and leg vasodilator capacity appear to be less modifiable in older women compared to older men and younger adults (Martin et al. 1990; Ridout et al. 2005; Spina 1999). Considering that the prevalence of aerobic exercise training program “non-responders” (i.e., no increase in VO2 max after 6 months) increases with increasing age and lower baseline fitness in women exposed to lower, more commonly prescribed exercise intensities (~50% of VO2 max; Sisson et al. 2009), one could predict that a typical aerobic walking program would likely fall short of providing the optimal therapeutic benefits in these central and peripheral responses for many older women. It may be, therefore, that in order for older women to experience equal improvements in these specific outcomes as their male counterparts, moderately higher intensities of aerobic exercise, and/or ancillary lifestyle or pharmacological treatments may be necessary (Paterson et al. 2007). Likewise, the lack of effect of exercise training on flow-mediated dilation in older men (Black et al. 2009) may indicate that alternative or complementary therapies are necessary to increase the maximal vasodilator reserve in older men in lieu of aerobic exercise training alone.
Modulation of cardiovascular aging by additional factors
There is growing recognition on part of both researchers and clinicians that the effect of aging on the cardiovascular system is sex-specific. The purpose of this review has been to present collective evidence suggesting that, additionally, the factors modifying cardiovascular aging may also be sex-specific. Specifically, we have focused on the modulatory effects of habitual physical activity and/or cardiorespiratory fitness and the resultant sex-specific cardiovascular adaptations. However, it should be noted that emerging evidence supports sex-specific modulation of the cardiovascular system by other factors, such as oxidative stress, genetics and pharmacological treatment, as well. For example, the influence of reductions in oxidative stress on resting leg blood flow (Jablonski et al. 2007; Moreau et al. 2007) is sex-dependent: acute ascorbic acid infusion fully restores the blunted resting leg blood flow observed in older men to the normal values observed in young men, whereas the same intervention only partially restores the blunted resting leg blood flow exhibited by older women (i.e., resting leg blood flow is improved but not fully restored to levels observed in young women). In contrast, carotid artery compliance is improved by reducing oxidative stress (again with acute ascorbic acid infusion) in postmenopausal women but not older men (Eskurza et al. 2004; Moreau et al. 2005). Additional examples include sex-specificity in the effect of perilipin haplotype on cardiovascular outcomes in older adults (Jenkins et al. 2009), as well as the efficacy of hypertension medications for reducing blood pressure (Gu et al. 2008).
Summary and future directions/perspectives
The current review presents emerging information regarding modulation of cardiovascular aging by habitual physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness in men versus women. Unfortunately, data assembled in the current review do not provide a uniform and clear picture regarding the interaction between cardiovascular aging and fitness in humans. For some variables, it appears that fitness and physical activity more strongly influence the cardiovascular system in older men versus women, and for other variables the direction of the sex difference is opposite or even null. The heterogeneity in findings may be attributable to the limited nature of current investigations specifically aimed at determining sex differences in the effect of either exercise training or chronic physical activity on the cardiovascular system. Interestingly, the growing body of evidence regarding chronic disease risk and physical activity/inactivity in men and women also indicates that physical activity plays a less effective role, and physical inactivity a more substantive role, in modulating certain chronic disease risks in women. We postulate that this may be an implication of the sex-specific plasticity of the aging cardiovascular system. Mechanisms such as sex hormones, sex-specificity of acute responses to exercise, and differing dose–response relationships to cardiovascular outcomes in men and women may contribute to the observed differences regarding the influence of physical activity fitness on the cardiovascular system, disease risk, and aging. Substantially more research should be aimed at elucidating mechanisms and therapeutic benefits associated with observed cardiovascular adaptations to short- and long-term exercise training programs in men and women.
At the least, the information presented in this review should encourage investigators who study cardiovascular aging to (1) consider the inclusion of both sexes in their studies, with sufficient numbers to detect sex differences, if possible, and (2) include estimates of physical activity and fitness (with physical activity questionnaires, accelerometers or pedometers, and oxygen uptake tests) with which to then conduct covariate analyses with physical activity and fitness on outcome variables. Such investigations will further our understanding of both exercise prescription as an aging countermeasure as well the mechanisms underlying observed sex differences.
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Sandra Smithmyer, Justin Pelberg, Aaron Mishkin, and Samuel Ridout in contributing to research discussed in the current article.