MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for direct tissue analysis: a new frontier for molecular histology
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Walch, A., Rauser, S., Deininger, SO. et al. Histochem Cell Biol (2008) 130: 421. doi:10.1007/s00418-008-0469-9
- 3.1k Downloads
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is a powerful tool for investigating the distribution of proteins and small molecules within biological systems through the in situ analysis of tissue sections. MALDI-IMS can determine the distribution of hundreds of unknown compounds in a single measurement and enables the acquisition of cellular expression profiles while maintaining the cellular and molecular integrity. In recent years, a great many advances in the practice of imaging mass spectrometry have taken place, making the technique more sensitive, robust, and ultimately useful. In this review, we focus on the current state of the art of MALDI-IMS, describe basic technological developments for MALDI-IMS of animal and human tissues, and discuss some recent applications in basic research and in clinical settings.
KeywordsMALDI imaging mass spectrometry Tissue In situ-proteomics Pathology
In biomedical research, the discovery of new biomarkers and new drugs demands analytical techniques with high sensitivity together with increased throughput. The possibility to localize or to follow changes in organisms at the molecular level by imaging component distributions of specific tissues is of prime importance to unravel biochemical pathways and develop new treatments and drugs (Rohner et al. 2005). In recent years, several proteomic methodologies have been developed that now make it possible to identify, characterize, and comparatively quantify the relative level of expression of hundreds of proteins that are co-expressed in a given cell type or tissue. These advances have resulted from the integration of diverse scientific disciplines including molecular and cellular biology, protein/peptide chemistry, bioinformatics, analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, and the use of instrumental and software tools. Mass spectrometry has become an indispensable tool for proteomic studies (Lavoie and Paiement 2008; Chaurand et al. 2004a; Aebersold and Goodlett 2001; Godovac-Zimmermann and Brown 2001; Lahm and Langen 2000; McDonald and Yates 2000; Pandey and Mann 2000; Roepstorff 1997). Desorption and ionization techniques such as matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI MS) (Hillenkamp et al. 1991; Karas and Hillenkamp 1988) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI MS) (Fenn et al. 1989) have revolutionized the analysis of proteins. These improvements offer levels of mass accuracy and sensitivity never before achieved for the detection and identification of proteins. MALDI MS is an ideal tool to investigate complex protein mixtures. It utilizes a matrix, a small acidic aromatic molecule that absorbs energy at the wavelength of the irradiating laser. The analyte molecule is mixed with the matrix, deposited on a target plate or a conductive glass slide and allowed to dry. During the drying process, matrix-analyte co-crystals form. These crystals are then submitted to very short laser pulses (typically UV laser light), resulting in the desorption and ionization of the analyte molecule. The ions mass-to-charge (m/z) are measured in a time-of-flight (TOF) mass analyzer (Chaurand et al. 2005).
To date, there are several technologies available to analyze proteins in a tissue specimen. The most commonly used technology is the separation and visualization of proteins by 2-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis and subsequent identification by mass spectrometry and database searching (Lahm and Langen 2000; Godovac-Zimmermann and Brown 2001). One of the drawbacks of the 2-D gel technology is that sample preparation removes the direct relationship between morphological tissue regions and a specific protein. One solution to this problem is to purify cells from thin tissue sections by microdissection techniques prior to protein extraction. Although such an approach has been successful (Curran et al. 2000), the extraction of a sufficient quantity of material is very labor intensive and requires a large amount of microdissected cells. A major advantage of direct MALDI analysis is to avoid time-consuming extraction, purification or separation steps, which have the potential for producing artefacts. One of the recent applications of MALDI MS is its use to profile and image proteins directly from tissue sections (Caprioli et al. 1997; Stoeckli et al. 2001; Todd et al. 2001; Chaurand and Caprioli 2002; Chaurand et al. 2002, 2004b, 2005; Cornett et al. 2007).
MALDI imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI-IMS) is a new technology that allows for simultaneous mapping of hundreds of peptides and proteins present in thin tissue sections with a lateral resolution of approximately 30–50 μm. Matrix is first uniformly deposited over the surface of the section, utilizing procedures optimized to minimize protein migration. Proteins are then desorbed from discrete spots or pixels upon irradiation of the sample in an ordered array or raster of the surface. Each pixel thus is keyed to a full mass spectrum consisting of signals from protonated species of molecules desorbed from that tissue region. A plot of the intensity of any one signal produces a map of the relative amount of that compound over the entire imaged surface. This technology provides a powerful discovery tool for the investigation of biological processes because the identities of proteins observed do not need to be known in advance. MALDI-IMS under various forms has already been successfully used to characterize the expression of proteins and other organic biological compounds in numerous normal and diseased tissues (Chaurand et al. 2005). For example, protein organization in mouse colon (Chaurand et al. 1999), brain (Stoeckli et al. 2001; Todd et al. 2001; Chaurand et al. 2002, 2004b) and epididymis (Chaurand et al. 2003) as well as phospholipid organization in mammalian lens tissue (Rujoi et al. 2004) has been studied. Variations in protein expression have been investigated in the cases of Parkinson’s (Pierson et al. 2004) and Alzheimer’s (Stoeckli et al. 2002) diseases. Several forms of cancers have also been investigated including gliomas (Stoeckli et al. 2001; Chaurand et al. 2004b; Schwartz et al. 2004), breast cancer (Palmer-Toy et al. 2000; Xu et al. 2002), prostate cancer (Masumori et al. 2001, Schwamborn et al. 2007), colon cancer (Chaurand et al. 2001) and lung cancer (Bhattacharya et al. 2003; Yanagisawa et al. 2003). In this later study (Yanagisawa et al. 2003), protein patterns have been shown to be predictive of diagnosis and prognosis. Methodologies aimed at detecting and mapping pharmaceutical compounds by direct MALDI MS analysis of sections from dosed tissues have also been described (Hsieh et al. 2007; Khatib-Shahidi et al. 2006; Reyzer et al. 2003).
This review article provides an overview of several animal and human tissue imaging applications performed by MALDI-IMS, including sample preparation, matrix selection and application, histological staining in MALDI analysis, tissue profiling, imaging, and data analysis. Several applications represent direct translation of this technology to basic research and in clinical applications.
In situ analysis of proteins from tissue sections
To use a mass spectrometer as an imaging instrument, it is essential for the spectrometer to be equipped with an automatic rastering function, automatic data acquisition system, and visualization software. Recently, several manufacturers have released novel instruments having these features. Almost all manufacturers have developed in-house software for their instruments and have included a driver for instrument and image reconstruction. Instruments used for imaging mass spectrometry can be classified according to how ions are generated from the sample: either by irradiation by pulsed laser or bombardment by energetic particles. Laser based systems include MALDI and laser desorption ionization instruments. Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) systems use particle bombardment with a continuous beam of highly-focused, energetic ions. In general, these imaging instruments were based mostly on MALDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF/TOF, or TOF-SIMS. MALDI-TOF imaging instruments are high throughput, and TOF-SIMS imaging instruments can provide submicrometer spatial resolution of ~500 nm (Altelaar et al. 2006). Both instruments have powerful advantages in imaging mass spectrometry. There are several published articles discussing and comparing MALDI and SIMS imaging (Heeren et al. 2005; McDonnell and Heeren 2007; Shimma et al. 2008). This review focuses on MALDI imaging.
Tissue sample acquisition and preparation
The representativity of an imaging mass spectrometry experiment, in terms of both chemical representativity and spatial integrity, can only be as good as the worst step in the entire process of sample acquisition, preparation, imaging mass spectrometry, and interpretation. In all sample-handling steps throughout acquisition and preparation, the spatial and chemical integrity must be maintained, within a length scale determined by the spatial resolution of the mass spectrometry technique used (McDonnell et al. 2007). Preparation methods for MALDI-IMS tissue imaging must be carefully performed to maintain the spatial arrangement of compounds and avoid delocalization and degradation of the analytes. Experimental parameters that should be considered include treatment of tissue immediately after sample procurement, sectioning, sample transfer to the MALDI target plate or conductive glass slide, matrix application, and tissue storage after sectioning (Caldwell and Caprioli 2005). Careful handling of tissue samples, including freezing the tissue in liquid nitrogen immediately after procurement, is essential to preserve the native condition of the tissue. Typically, the interior of tissue samples is exposed using cryosectioning techniques. Embedding in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) polymer or Tissue-Tek® should be avoided as it can smear across the sample, thus compromising the chemical integrity. Embedding in gelatine (Altelaar et al. 2005) and agarose (Kruse and Sweedler 2003) has been used to facilitate handling of small or fragile samples (e.g., biopsies) but most often cryosectioning is performed directly with the frozen tissue samples (Kruse and Sweedler 2003; Schwartz et al. 2003). Although thickness is not critical, 10–20 μm thick sections are optimal for handling and analyzing in the high vacuum environment of the mass spectrometer. The thickness of the tissue sections used is normally 10–20 μm: thin sections can be very fragile and difficult to manipulate, whereas thicker sections need longer to dry and, because they are insulating samples, can adversely affect the performance of the mass analyzer (Caldwell and Caprioli 2005). The sample plate of choice is a transparent conductive slide such as indium-tin-oxide-coated glass slides because they allow the optical microscopic image acquisition and mass spectrometry to be performed on the same sample (Chaurand et al. 2004b; Altelaar et al. 2005).
The significant potential of tissue-based proteomic biomarker studies can be restricted by difficulties in accessing tissue samples in optimal fresh-frozen form. While archival formalin-fixed tissue collections with attached clinical and outcome data represent a valuable alternate resource, the use of formalin as a fixative which induces protein cross-linking, has generally been assumed to render them unsuitable for proteomic studies. Formalin fixation of tissues, generally followed by paraffin embedding, is the standard and well-established processing method employed by pathologists. Analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues from biopsy libraries has been, so far, a challenge for proteomics biomarker studies. To date, paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues are limited candidates for MALDI MS tissue profiling because these treatments may hamper efficient ionization of the proteins and peptides. There are recent methodological reports demonstrating the principal feasibility of MALDI-IMS on FFPE tissues (Stauber et al. 2008; Lemaire et al. 2007a; Wisztorski et al. 2007).
Selection and application of MALDI matrices
The multiple roles played by the matrix in the desorption and ionization of large analytes has lead to the optimum choice of matrices for different molecular classes being empirically determined (McDonnell et al. 2005). For tissue analysis, it has been reported that sinapinic acid provides the best signals for higher molecular weight proteins, whereas α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid is more suitable for lower molecular weight peptides (Schwartz et al. 2003). For higher spatial resolution analysis, in which deposition of the matrix solution has been carefully controlled to minimize spatial relocation, sinapinic acid has been recommended (Kruse and Sweedler 2003).
Matrix application protocols include manual methods such as spraying using an airbrush or TLC sprayer or dipping the tissue sections into matrix containing solutions (Schwartz et al. 2003). An intrinsic disadvantage of these manual procedures is poor reproducibility; higher reproducibility can be achieved using automated sample preparation devices. These devices fall into two classes: spotting devices and spraying devices. Matrix spotters (e.g., Labcyte Portrait, Shimadzu ChiP or Leaptec TMiD) apply small droplets of matrix solution in a grid onto the tissue. Underneath each droplet the spatial information is lost, so the lateral resolution is defined by the spot-to-spot distance. This distance can actually be significantly larger than the actual droplet size, because the requirement for spotting onto the same position repeatedly to achieve sufficient matrix coating causes significant loss of resolution due to small positioning inaccuracies. In addition, capillary forces cause some droplets moving on the tissue off their landing site. Another reason for reduced spotting resolution is crystallizing matrix at the nozzle of, e.g., piezoelectric dispensers which affects the angle of droplet impact. Robot designs without a nozzle can efficiently eliminate the clogging problem, though not the previously listed effects. Here the droplet is ejected from an open reservoir by a sonic impulse (Labcyte) (Aerni et al. 2006). Spotting robots can also be used to add chemical reagents onto the tissue in a controlled way to perform chemical modifications or digestions on the tissue, as reported with the CHiP (Shimadzu) (Groseclose et al. 2007). However, spotting robots suffer with regard to preparation time, which increases quadratically with the tissue area and targeted resolution, and lateral resolution limitations. Spotters are limited to provide for image resolutions in the 200–500 μm range. Because smaller droplets do not extract the analyte as efficient as large ones, the spectra quality rapidly drops if preparations for higher image resolutions are used. Significantly higher resolutions can be achieved by spray preparation of the matrix onto the tissue. Two spraying principles are currently utilized in commercial devices: pneumatic spray and vibrational spray. The ImagePrep device (Bruker Daltonics) utilizes vibrational vaporization of the matrix with a piezo-electric spray head. The spray head moves a pinhole sheet next to the matrix reservoir to eject small droplets with an average diameter of 20 μm. These droplets deposit onto the tissue and incubate in a controlled atmosphere chamber. The entire process of spraying and drying is monitored by an optical scattering-light sensor that allows the evaluation of the tissue wetness, matrix thickness and drying rate. Therefore, ImagePrep allows high resolutions of up to 25 μm with a good spectra quality by push button operation, being a significant advantage for routine operation. Another spray robot, the TM-sprayer (Leaptec), uses a heated capillary with a pneumatic spray that moves in predefined patterns over the tissue sample. This makes the spray more reproducible than a manual pneumatic spray. Parameters such as the drying rate and the wetness of the tissue are not monitored during the preparation but have to be tuned in advance.
Histological staining of tissues and MALDI-IMS
For the interpretation of MALDI-IMS results it is an absolute necessity to correlate the MALDI image with the histological information. Advanced MALDI-IMS software allows superimposing the MALDI images over a macroscopic or microscopic optical image of the sample taken before the MALDI measurement. While that primary macroscopic optical image is sufficient to recognize the outline of the tissue and to define the measurement area, it is usually not possible to see histological features in that image in contrast to microscopic images. For a histomorphological interpretation it is necessary to use stained tissue sections. Two approaches have been used to correlate histology with the MALDI-IMS result so far.
Histological staining of a consecutive section
In this approach, one section is used for the MALDI imaging, and another section is used to do the histological staining. This approach allows the use of any staining protocol, especially to use a Hematoxylin–Eosin (H&E) staining. This staining technique is a preferred histological staining because it yields a high degree of information on the sample. The main difficulty with this approach is the fact that the MALDI image is derived from a different section than the histological image. It may be sufficient to differentiate rather large tissue features, such as large invasive tumor regions from large connective tissue regions. To some degree it remains guesswork if the features seen in the histology are properly matched with the molecular information.
Histological staining of the section prior to the MALDI-IMS
This approach has been reported to integrate histology and MALDI-IMS (Chaurand et al. 2004b), and it does allow an unambiguous correlation of histomorphology and MALDI-IMS. One of the commonly used staining procedures in clinical pathology employs H&E, although unfortunately the quality of the mass spectra from these sections is significantly compromised relative to that obtained from unstained sections. To circumvent these limitations, protocols were developed to permit histomorphology and protein profiling to be performed on the very same tissue section. A series of commonly used histological dyes was tested for compatibility with mass spectrometric analysis. It was found that cresyl violet and methylene blue, as well as several other dyes, do not compromise overall mass spectra quality and allow specific regions of tissues to be easily analyzed. This approach has two disadvantages, however, first, it subjects the sample to additional handling steps prior the measurement. Second, and more severe is the fact that the choice of stains is limited to MALDI compatible ones. These stains (e.g., methylene blue or DAPI) are sufficient to localize cells in the histology, but they do not yield the same information as an H&E stain, so crucial information on the sample may be missed and it is still necessary to do a full H&E staining on a consecutive section.
Data processing, visualization and statistical analysis
In MALDI-IMS very information-rich datasets with hundreds of mass signals can be obtained. This is clearly an advantage, but it may become a limitation when a large number of datasets have to be evaluated peak-by-peak, because the evaluation can be very time consuming. Many tools have been developed to visualize and analyze this vast dataset intelligently and efficiently. Using different data processing strategies for visualization, it enables fast mass spectrometric imaging of large surfaces at high-spatial resolution and thus aids in the understanding of various diseases and disorders (Klinkert et al. 2007, Villmann et al. 2008). This includes many basic but widely used features, such as region-of-interest analysis, choice of intensity scales for image display (color palette, linear/logarithmic), image overlay, binning of spectral and image data for improved signal-to-noise, intensity profiles (variation of intensity with time or space), and chemical libraries for analyte identification (McDonnell and Heeren 2007). In addition to these facilities, imaging mass spectrometrists have continued to develop a broad array of tools. These have improved the quality of information extracted from the large data sets, reduced the dimensionality to more practical levels and allowed different imaging data sets to be aligned and compared. Several available software programs address data management, including determination of statistical significance and relative abundance between particular protein species. Moreover, the need for such software amid the growing number of proteomics laboratories will ensure that such programming will be standardized, continually upgraded, and user friendly. For clinical studies, large numbers of patients need to be studied, each having unique aspects to their disease. Indeed, the base premise of individualized medicine is founded on this exciting but enormously complex molecular diversity. It is evident that innovative biocomputational studies are an absolute necessity in identifying individualized molecular patterns to aid in diagnosis and prognosis. Examples of data analysis algorithms have been published and consist of four steps. Proteins are selected that are differentially expressed among histomorphological defined groups. This selection is based on the Kruskal–Wallis test, Fisher’s exact test (dichotomizing the expression level as present or not), the Student’s t test, significance analysis of microarrays, weighted gene analysis, and the modified info score methods. The cutoff points for each method are P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, 3.5, 2, and 0, respectively. Proteins are included in the final list if they meet at least three of these six selection criteria (Caldwell and Caprioli 2005). One technique to reduce the complexity of the information in multidimensional datasets in MALDI-IMS is the principal component analysis (PCA) (Van de Plas et al. 2007). This is a transformation of the original coordinate system defined by peak intensities to a coordinate system that better explains the variance in the dataset. The new coordinates are called principal components and are ordered in decreasing number of variance. By removing those PC’s that do not contain a lot of information the dimensionality of the dataset can be reduced to a large extent. The principal component scores can then be used to reconstruct a few images that contain most of the information.
Recent work has shown that digestion and identification of proteins may be coupled with direct tissue analysis (Groseclose et al. 2007). This technique involves automatically depositing a spotted array of enzymatic solution onto the tissue at room temperature. After hydrolysis, MALDI matrix is deposited onto the array for subsequent MALDI MS analysis. The in situ identification of proteins requires less time than conventional protein identification strategies and the ability to compare a given protein image to the image of its subsequent peptides increases identification confidence. This process is best used for validation, i.e., where the presence of one or more specific proteins is needed to be established (Herring et al. 2007).
Finally, immunohistochemistry can be employed to verify protein identification, assuming appropriate antibodies for the protein exist.
Application of MALDI-IMS to tissue analysis
A majority of MALDI-IMS studies have been dedicated to the study of proteins contained in human and animal tissue sections (Cornett et al. 2007). Applications in the field of pathology hold particular interest for many because of the potential benefit for clinical diagnoses and treatment. These applications are complemented by the field of MALDI-IMS for the detection of drugs and metabolites in tissues. Other studies have focused on proteomic events occurring in normally developing tissues.
Diagnostic and prognostic assessments in clinical pathology
To date, profiling and imaging by MALDI-IMS has been applied to multiple diseased tissues, including human non-small-cell lung tumors (Yanagisawa et al. 2003), gliomas (Schwartz et al. 2005), breast cancer (Cornett et al. 2006) and ovarian tumors (Lemaire et al. 2007b) and continues to be a main focus of MALDI-IMS studies (Chaurand et al. 2004a; Caprioli 2005; Caldwell and Caprioli 2005; Sköld et al. 2006; Stoeckli et al. 2007; Meistermann et al. 2006; Cornett et al. 2006; Herring et al. 2007; Corbin et al. 2008). Molecular protein signatures represent a unique data set with which to classify and correlate clinically relevant information and outcomes with changing molecular events ongoing in the progression and treatment of disease. The general approach taken by these studies is comparative proteomic analyses whereby mass spectral features (m/z peaks) are correlated with a variety of patient data, such as therapeutic regimen and overall outcome. In some cases, the goal of the experiment is to identify specific molecular changes associated with progression of disease. For example, molecular signatures from glioma or non-small-cell lung cancer can be used to distinguish tumor grade and were found to be correlated with patient survival (Yanagisawa et al. 2003; Schwartz et al. 2005). Identification of specific cellular changes within heterogeneous tissue can be particularly challenging from the perspective of matrix spot size, placement and lateral resolution (Cornett et al. 2007). From work already published, it seems likely that the integration of this technology into protocols for disease diagnosis as well as outcome prediction will soon take place. As protein expression data becomes available from various tissue types, this approach will provide a common disease-wide approach that can be applied to many specific problems. One can envision that, e.g., the use of MALDI-IMS technology to evaluate a “tumour of unknown primary.” Current data suggests that MALDI MS might be superior to immunohistochemical stains in identifying the site of origin for such tumors (Chaurand et al. 2004a). The potential capability of MALDI-IMS to measure response to therapeutic agents in tumor and surrounding tissues is a particularly exciting application of this technology. The original protein profile obtained from the primary tumor could be used to influence the selection of therapeutic agents. Levels of drugs such as chemotherapeutic agents could be measured directly from a tissue biopsy to assess adequacy of delivery to a particular organ site. The ability of drugs and other bioreactive molecules to adequately penetrate larger tumors has long been known to be problematic and could be more adequately assessed by this technology. In addition, alterations in specific molecular pathways directly modulated or indirectly affected by the agent could be evaluated. Studies of this type that establish proof of principle have been reported (Reyzer et al. 2003). Similar methods could be envisioned to monitor patients treated with conservative therapy for relapse. Together with genomics and perhaps additional molecular information describing the state of lipids and metabolites, proteomics provides an entry into individualized medicine, where each patient’s disease is unique at the molecular level and will be treated accordingly (Chaurand et al. 2004a).
Small-molecule imaging and drug metabolism
During drug discovery often the question is raised as to whether the drug can reach the site of action which helps researchers better assess the potential value of that compound as a pharmaceutical product and toxicological outcomes (Hsieh et al. 2007). MALDI-IMS opens the possibility to directly determine the distribution of pharmaceuticals in tissue sections which might unravel their disposition or biotransformation pathway for new drug development. Many compounds that are biologically or pharmacologically relevant are less than 1 kDa in size and thus fall into the broad category of small molecules (Cornett et al. 2007). These include both exogenous and endogenous molecules, such as pharmaceutical compounds and their metabolites, drugs of abuse, environmental toxins, endogenous metabolites and lipids. Compared to the standard method in this field, the whole-body autoradiography (WBA), MALDI imaging offers some advantages but also some drawbacks. In WBA, a radioactive labeled drug is administered to the animal. Thin sections of the animals are then exposed to photographic film which detects the radioactivity. The advantages of MALDI-IMS in contrast to WBA are that it is not needed to use radiolabeled drugs. This is a big advantage especially in early stages of drug development since there large numbers of compounds need to be screened and preparing radiolabeled drugs is tedious. The second advantage of MALDI-IMS is that it offers the possibility to differentiate between the drug and its metabolites, while in WBA the radioactivity may come from either drug or metabolite. On the other hand, WBA will always yield a result and has a very low detection limit. In MALDI-IMS, there is always a possibility that the ion of interest is suppressed in desorption. The detection limit of MALDI-IMS is strongly dependent on the drug, some drugs may not even be seen. This is why MALDI-IMS of drugs has found its main application in drug safety studies, where high doses of drugs are used. Drug imaging differs from other MALDI imaging applications such a way that the compound to be detected is known in advance. The mass range in which the drugs are measured is usually crowded by a large number of signals that come from the MALDI matrix as well as from lipids and naturally occurring substances. It is therefore necessary to ensure the necessary specificity of detection of a particular, probably small signal in between many other signals. This has been so far mainly achieved by using a MS/MS measurement. The ion of interest is selected and fragmented. The quantification and reconstruction of the MALDI image is then done on a specific fragment of the drug. Interfering signals of similar mass in MS mode usually yield different MS/MS signals, so the necessary specificity of the measurement is achieved. Recently MALDI-IMS became available on instruments, that allow the measurement of mass signals with very high resolution and precision, namely Fourier-transform mass spectrometers (Cornett et al. 2008). In these instruments the necessary specificity of the drug imaging experiment can be reached by measuring the precise mass of the drug. Matrix and background ions that would interfere in instruments with lower resolution can be separated in the MS mode alone. Applications of small-molecule MALDI-IMS focused on pharmaceutically active compounds and their metabolites (Khatib-Shahidi et al. 2006; Hsieh et al. 2006, 2007), and considerable effort continues in this field (Reyzer and Caprioli 2007). For example, one study reported the localization of the drug olanzapine and two-first-pass metabolites in whole-rat sections (Khatib-Shahidi et al. 2006). The results of this study correlated well with both autoradiography and LC-MS/MS quantitative results, illustrating the power of MALDI-IMS for metabolite profiling. More recently, there has been considerable interest in adding quantitative capabilities to the MALDI-IMS experiment (Signor et al. 2007; Corr et al. 2006). The technology also opens up the exciting possibility of correlating drug distribution with concomitant protein changes (Reyzer et al. 2004).
Protein imaging and profiling using MALDI-IMS has become a powerful method for analyzing changes in global protein expression patterns in cells and tissues as a function of developmental processes (Cornett et al. 2007). Proteomic studies using MALDI-IMS can yield insight into some complex biological processes. MALDI-IMS analyses of epididymal sections have been used to determine the localized composition of the epididymal fluid from caput to cauda (Chaurand et al. 2003), confirming that different protein compositions are found along the length of the epididymis. Other recent examples include the direct imaging of secretory peptides from frog skin (Brand et al. 2006) and bovine and rabbit ocular lens proteins (Han and Schey 2006; Grey and Schey 2008), as well as neuropeptides from rat pituitary (Altelaar et al. 2007), decapod crustacean neuronal tissue (DeKeyser et al. 2007), protein profiles during embryo implantation (Burnum et al. 2008) or mouse prostate development (Chaurand et al. 2008).
Imaging of phospholipids
Lipidomics is one new frontier in biomarker research. Not only are lipids the main components in membranes that define the contours of the cell and its organelles, but they are also used for storage. Lipids form stable noncovalent complexes with proteins as well as with many drugs. Lipids are a storage depot for drugs and certain types of organic molecules. Analysis of lipids is challenging because of the wide molecular diversity of this class of compounds and their relative insolubility in aqueous systems. Direct tissue imaging by MALDI-IMS is a powerful tool as it gives a more complete and accurate structural picture and can trace and follow where drugs localize in tissue with minimal anatomical disruption and a minimum of manipulations. The use of ion mobility has also been reported in conjunction with MALDI MS as a means to fractionate lipids (Woods and Jackson 2006; Jackson et al. 2005a, b; Cornett et al. 2007; McLean et al. 2007). In this technique, ions are first separated by ion mobility and then analyzed by TOF mass spectrometry. The desorbed lipid ions fall on a trend line (a function of charge and collision cross-section) that is separate from those of oligonucleosides, peptides, proteins, and drugs and metabolites having the same nominal mass. This allows ions originating from lipids to be distinguished from other small molecules. Another study reported label-free imaging mass spectrometry to study lipid–lipid interactions in a model membrane system (Zheng et al. 2007).
The emergence of MALDI-IMS has provided an enormous impulse to the field of imaging mass spectrometry. Direct tissue analysis by MALDI-IMS is an important technology for assessing the localization of molecular species and for revealing the underlying molecular signatures indicative of disease. The molecular species identified in these experiments can provide insight into mechanisms and etiology of disease. It is now commercially available and is widely used to record the spatial distributions of numerous peptide and protein ions, in parallel and without a label, from tissue sections and cells. It has been applied to study the changes in protein expression levels and distributions associated with a range of pathologies. Furthermore, the same techniques are used to trace the distribution of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites within organs and complete animals, as well as to investigate the resulting changes in the organ’s proteome. The potential of MALDI imaging has driven many developments covering all aspects of the experiment. Advances in data acquisition now allow fast MALDI imaging with high-spatial resolution. Developments in sample preparation have also continued unabated. Many of the developments discussed in this review can be combined, the results can then be analyzed using multivariate techniques or combined with information from other imaging techniques using cross correlation analysis (Sinha et al. 2008). These results can then be compared with the results of global proteomics/lipidomics strategies applied to spatially resolved samples, either through voxelization, laser-capture microdissection, or any other sample preparation protocol. It is this potential, which is slowly being fulfilled, to obtain extensive spatially resolved biomolecular information, an absolute necessity for a thorough picture of the molecular processes underpinning biological and pathological processes or to track the distribution of pharmaceuticals that is attracting ever more interest.
We thank Ulrike Buchholz, Claudia-Mareike Pflüger, Eleonore Samson, and Andreas Voss for excellent technical assistance in performing MALDI-IMS.