Connexons and cell adhesion: a romantic phase

Open AccessReview

DOI: 10.1007/s00418-008-0434-7

Cite this article as:
Prochnow, N. & Dermietzel, R. Histochem Cell Biol (2008) 130: 71. doi:10.1007/s00418-008-0434-7


Recent evidence indicates, that gap junction forming proteins do not only contribute to intercellular communication (Kanno and Saffitz in Cardiovasc Pathol 10:169–177, 2001; Saez et al. in Physiol Rev 83:1359–1400, 2003), ion homeostasis and volume control (Goldberg et al. in J Biol Chem 277:36725–36730, 2002; Saez et al. in Physiol Rev 83:1359–1400, 2003). They also serve biological functions in a mechanical sense, supporting adherent connections between neighbouring cells of epithelial and non-epithelial tissues (Clair et al. in Exp Cell Res 314:1250–1265, 2008; Shaw et al. in Cell 128:547–560, 2007), where they stabilize migratory pathways in the developing central nervous system (Elias et al. in Nature 448:901–907, 2007; Malatesta et al. in Development 127:5253–5263, 2000; Noctor et al. in Nature 409:714–720, 2001; Rakic in Brain Res 33:471–476, 1971; J Comp Neurol 145:61–83 1972; Science 241:170–176, 1988), or mediate polarized movements and directionality of neural crest cells during organogenesis (Kirby and Waldo in Circ Res 77:211–215, 1995; Xu et al. in Development 133:3629–3639, 2006). Since, most data describing adhesive properties of gap junctions delt with connexin 43 (Cx43) (Beardslee et al. in Circ Res 83:629–635, 1998), we will focus our brief review on this isoform.


Gap junctionHemichannelCell adhesionHeartDeveloping brain


For those readers who are not familiar with the molecular composition of gap junctions, we will briefly recollect the substructure of this cell contact and refer to recent detailed reviews (Duffy et al. 2002; Gaietta et al. 2002; Goodenough and Paul 2003; Meier and Dermietzel 2006; Willecke et al. 2002).

Gap junctions are formed by hemichannels (connexons), which consist of an oligomer of six proteins (connexins). At present, at least 20 genes seem to be present in the human and rodent genome (Willecke et al. 2002), which may oligomerize in monomeric or heteromeric patterns to form a hemichannel. A complete gap junction channel is formed by two hemichannels in mirror symmetry (Fig. 1). Heterotypic configurations of different isoforms are allowed for some connexins while others occur exclusively in homotypic configuration. In the history of gap junctions, the junctional plaque has always been considered to occur in a “naked” form without cytoplasmic adjuncts like scaffolding proteins or cytoskeletal elements (Hirokawa and Heuser 1982). However, accruing evidence indicates that gap junctions are associated with a complex system of scaffolding and cytoskeletal proteins, which seem to assemble in cell specific patterns (Duffy et al. 2002 for recent review).
Fig. 1

General structure of a gap junction plaque. Gap junctions are formed by paired hemichannels (connexons) of two adjacent cells. A single connexon is made by a polymer of six connexins. Only apposed connexons allow intercellular transfer of ions (ionic coupling) and small metabolites (metabolic coupling). Unapposed connexons seem to perform per se functions

In the following, we will put main emphasis on heart and brain tissues for which most of the data on gap junctions and cell adhesion have been reviewed.

Cardiomyocytes: directed trafficking of connexin43 involves the cytoskeleton and adhesion plaques

In the terminal intercalated discs between cardiomyocytes, Cx43 celebrates an example for integrating its hemichannel and cell coupling functions (Gros and Jongsma 1996; Shaw and Rudy 1997; van Veen et al. 2001). Asides the terminal intercalated discs, gap junctions are also localised in the lateral sarcolemma of the heart (Fig. 2), and thus described to form site-to-site and end-to-end connections (Yao et al. 2003). Cardiomyocytes also represent unopposed connexons with hemichannel function in the lateral sarcolemma (Saez et al. 2003; Schulz and Heusch 2006; Yao et al. 2003).
Fig. 2

a shows cultured cardiomyocytes immunolabelled with an anti-Cx43 antibody (red). Immunolabelling is prevalent in apposed cell membranes, but also in some unapposed domains. Nuclei are counterstained with Hoechst dye. b Immunolabelling of heart tissue with Cx43 antibody. Intercalated discs (red) are intensivley stained. Bar indicates 25 μm

To ensure its’ trafficking and functional integration into a gap junction plaque or in form of unpaired connexons (hemichannels) into the plasma membrane, Cx43 has to interact with other proteins. In the intercalated discs of coupled cardiomyocytes for instance, gap junction plaques are embedded into adherens junctions, which are primarily formed by cadherins (Matsuda et al. 2006; Niessen 2007; Zuppinger et al. 2000). Whilst the adherens junction supports the mechanical coupling (Gutstein et al. 2003; Niessen 2007), the gap junction ensures the propagation of action potentials along the cardiomyocytes (Gros and Jongsma 1996; Shaw and Rudy 1997).

Multiple models describe the pathway from connexon assembly to the initial gap junction formation and interaction with cadherins in the adherens junction. The most common examples are based on half-life time determined trafficking and junctional protein (cadherins) mediated activation of Cx43. The half-life time of Cx43 is restricted between 1 and 3 h, and implicates a dynamic process of assembly, insertion and replacement of connexons, and pairing of connexons to form gap junctions (Beardslee et al. 1998; Hofer and Dermietzel 1998; Laird et al. 1991). Cx43 synthesis was shown to be located on membrane bound ribosomes, where connexin proteins are rapidly oligomerized into homo or heteromeric connexons (Evans et al. 1999; Martin and Evans 2004). Final packing into hemichannel loaded vesicles occurs in the trans-Golgi network as shown by Musil and Goudenough (1993) followed by directed transport along microtubules to multiple insertion sites in the membrane (Akhmanova and Hoogenraad 2005; Jordan et al. 1999; Lauf et al. 2002; Mimori-Kiyosue et al. 2005; Shaw et al. 2007). Once arrived at the gap junction borders at the membrane, connexons are assumed to be inserted via flipping events into the membrane and to diffuse into the centre of the plaque, whilst elderly connexin proteins are shifted to the plaque periphery for subsequent disposal (Gaietta et al. 2002; Laird 2005; Segretain and Falk 2004).

The finding that mislocated Cx43 gap junction plaques in the ischemic myocardium are associated with similarly misplaced adherens junctions (Matsushita et al. 1999), underlines an interdependence between Cx43 and the adherens junction related cadherins (Angst et al. 1997; Li et al. 2005; Luo and Radice 2003; Matsushita et al. 1999). E-cadherin transfections into gap junction incompetent cells, allowed the transfectants to build out functional gap junctions (Matsushita et al. 1999). Furthermore, N-cadherin knockout mice (Luo and Radice 2003) and conditional knockdown of N-cadherin in the heart caused mislocalisation and compromized expression of gap junctions. Conditional knockdown of N-cadherin in the heart was additionally shown to lead to arrhythmogenic death (Li et al. 2005), which may involve aberrant regulation of gap junction function (for reviews see: Duffy et al. 2007)

Recently, Shaw et al. (2007) described microtubule-mediated target-delivered transport of Cx43 via microtubule plus-end-tracking proteins (+TIPs) and interaction partners such as p150(GLUED) (Berrueta et al. 1999), a component of the dynein/dynactin complex, which in turn is potent to tether microtubules at the adherens junctions (Chausovsky et al. 2000; Ligon et al. 2001). Studies implicating fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) on Cx43-YFP transfected HeLa cells that do not endogenously express Cx43, revealed a rapid Cx43 delivery to gap junction plaques. Deconvolution clarified that microtubules extend directly to the gap junction plaques at the cell’s border and total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy and time lapse imaging revealed the appearance of a preferential and prolonged association of microtubule plus ends with the plaques. Most strikingly, Shaw et al. (2007) were able to show that gap junction plaque formation was disrupted by siRNA knockdown of the dimeric +TIP EB1. EB1 associates directly with the plus ends of microtubules and provides, in turn, dual binding sites for adherens junction related proteins like p150(GLUED) and β-catenin. Furthermore, in this setting gap junction plaques could also be disrupted via Nocodazol and Taxol treatment, peptides, which compromise the homophilic cadherin-cadherin interaction in adherens junctions. This setting according to the recent paper by Shaw et al. (2007) is sketched in the cartoon (Fig. 3). While Nocodazol interrupts formation of microtubules by depolimerization, Taxol lets microtubules remain stable, but interferes with their EB1 interaction partner (Nakata and Hirokawa 2003).
Fig. 3

Model for microtubulus mediated delivery of vesicle-bound connexons to adherens junctions (adapted from Shaw et al. 2007). Microtubules bind via their +end to EB1. EB1 in turn binds to P150 (GLUED), a component of the dynein/dynactin complex, which interacts with β-catenin through P120-catenin with the adherens junction. This interaction is understood to tether the microtubule to the junction and to serve as a gateway for connexon delivery

In this context, actin is discussed to act as an initial sensor of cell-cell interaction, driving the localisation of adherens junctions with assistance from Rho-GTPases (Noren et al. 2001, 2003).

Spread of Shigella flexneri requires connexin43 hemichannels

How close cytoskeletal (re-)organization and intracellular connexin distribution are related is demonstrated for polarized intestinal cells during Shigella flexneri invasion (Clair et al. 2008). For invading the colonic mucosa (Labrec et al. 1964), the gram negative enteric bacillus requires RhoGTPases, Src and Abl/Arg tyrosine kinases for actin polymerization and formation of cytoplasmic extensions of surrounding cells (Burton et al. 2003; Tran Van Nhieu et al. 2000). The invasion and dissemination of the bacteria causes intense inflammatory responses, and especially ATP-dependent paracrine signalling induced by Cx hemichannel opening (Tran Van Nhieu et al. 2000). E-cadherins were indispensable for the intercellular spreading of S. flexneri (Sansonetti et al. 1994). It is assumed that a cytoskeletal reorganization toward the formation zone of gap junctions is induced in this process to allow the spread of the bacteria (Clair et al. 2008; Tran Van Nhieu et al. 2000). On the epithelial level there is mounting evidence that connexin hemichannels regulate intercellular signalling (Stout et al. 2004), which might be of importance for incoming phagocytic cells during bacterial infection (Ferrari et al. 1997; Griffiths et al. 1995; John et al. 2001; Korcok et al. 2004).

The developing brain and hemichannel adhesion

The necessity of gap junction adhesion via regulation by its cytoskeleton interaction partners p120 catenin, integrin and actin has become well identified in the developing brain (Xu et al. 2001, 2006). Here, stem cells of the developing neocortex give rise to neurons (Malatesta et al. 2000; Noctor et al. 2001) and provide guidance of the developing neurons to the target zones of the cortical plate, where they are meant to become pyramidal cells of the adult cortex (Rakic 1971, 1972, 1988). Electron microscopy showed, that during the process of migration of neuronal precursors, gap junctions occur between radial fibres and migrating neurons and nestin− and nestin+ cells (Huang et al. 1998a). The most important gap junction protein isoforms are Cx43 and Cx26 in developing brain tissue (Dermietzel et al. 1989). Until now there was evidence that gap junctions between radial glia and migrating neurons served for chemical and electrical communication. Elias et al. (2007) recently found that Cx26 and Cx43 are expressed in β-III tubulin positive migrating neurons in the contacting regions close to vimentin positive radial glial fibres. Using a RNA knockdown of Cx43 and Cx26 by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) constructs in rat, the authors were able to demonstrate a reduced fractioning of neurons in the cortical plate. In addition, transplantation of Cx26 and Cx43 shRNA knocked down donor cells into E17 wildtype mice revealed an intact engrafting of the donor cells into the host brain, but no migration. Immunocytochemistry of the shRNA knocked down transplanted neurons in the recipient brains showed no compromised cell cycle exit and no alterations of differentiation. Furthermore, the expression of the adherens related proteins ZO-1, N-cadherin and β-integrin was not altered, indicating that gap junctions mediate glial-guided radial migration of developing neurons in the cortex. This migration was additionally demonstrated to rely on the adhesive and not on the channel properties of Cx26 or Cx43 (Elias et al. 2007). Dominant negative connexin mutants lacking channel properties were still able to form adhesive contacts. In reverse experiments, the authors demonstrated that channel, but no adhesion forming mutants, were unable to rescue the Cx43 shRNA induced migration defect. Finally, time lapse imaging of Cx43/Cx26 shRNA expressing neurons affirmed their inability to stabilize their processes and to continue to extend along the radial glia.

Neural crest cells and colonization

Gap junction regulated polarized cell movements and directional migration are not restricted to developmental processes within the central nervous system (Elias et al. 2007; Schaar and McConnell 2005). Studies focusing on Cx43 expression of cardiac neural crest cells indicated a clear relationship between their migratory properties and Cx43 expression (Huang et al. 1998a, b; Li et al. 2002; Lo et al. 1999; Reaume et al. 1995; Sullivan and Lo 1995; Xu et al. 2001, 2006). Neural crest cells are ectomesenchymal cells emerging from epithelial mesenchymal cell transformation in the dorsal neural tube from where they disperse throughout the embryo to generate a variety of tissues (Kirby and Waldo 1995; Xu et al. 2006). Neural crest cells from different axial levels of the neural tube use multiple migratory pathways to reach their terminal destinations. Cardiac neural crest cells (CNCs) have been shown to migrate along a circumpharyngeal pathway to reach the aortic arches and the heart (Kirby et al. 1983; Lumsden et al. 1991). This deployment has been shown to be modulated by Cx43 and cytoskeletal interaction partners with the extracellular matrix (Xu et al. 2006). The finding, that dynamic di- and reassembly of focal contacts is essential for polarized cell movements and directional cell migration moved the heterodimeric receptor group of integrins into the centre of related studies. Integrins cluster to form focal domains within the cell membrane, linking the extracellular matrix to the actin cytoskeleton. Since, it could be shown that neural crest cells express multiple integrins (Delannet et al. 1994; Monier-Gavelle and Duband 1997) and perturbation studies provide evidence that integrins modulate the migratory behaviour of neural crest cells, (Strachan and Condic 2003, 2004, 2008) the question arose whether integrin signalling might be affected in Cx43 expressing versus Cx43 knock out cells (Xu et al. 2006).

In neural tube explants of the post-otic hindbrain folds from E8.5 mice, underlying either an Cx43 knockout or Cx43 overexpression, neural crest cells were generated that emerge from the same axial level as CNCs, which migrate to the heart. In contrast to overexpressing CNCs, the Cx43 deficient CNC type was characterized by a severe loss of directionality and reduced adhesion whilst being cultured on a fibronectin matrix. Furthermore, an increase in the fibronectin matrix density leads to reductions in the migratory speed of Cx43 deficient CNCs, as shown via time lapse videomicroscopy (Xu et al. 2001). In fact double-immunostaining against β1-integrin and vinculin as markers for focal adhesion, was significantly reduced in Cx43 deficient CNCs, indicating a reduction in the actin-cytoskeletal linkage for matrix adhesion. A modulatory influence of Cx43 on the actin cytoskeleton became evident in rhodamine-phalloidine stainings, where Cx43 knockout CNCs represented shorter stress fibre bundles (Xu et al. 2001). Additionally, these bundles exhibit no anchoring via vinculin to focal adhesions, as being observed for Cx43 overexpressing CNCs. Furthermore, adhesion and migration of Cx43 deficient CNCs on a fibronectin matrix could be inhibited by semaphorin application, which is described to act as a potent blocker of integrin activation (Brown et al. 2001). This approach also confirmed that Cx43 modulates the retraction of cellular processes. Immunoprecipitation, Western blot and immunocytochemistry pointed out that Cx43 in CNCs does not co-localise with β1-integrin, but with vinculin and actin-filaments (Osborne et al. 2005; Pasterkamp and Kolodkin 2003; Serini et al. 2003; Xu et al. 2006). This finding is supported by the co-localisation of Cx43 with several actin binding proteins, such as ezrin, IQGAP, α-actinin and drebrin (Butkevich et al. 2004). No correlation between gap junctional coupling properties and the density of fibronectin matrix was found for Cx43 knockouts and Cx43 overexpressing CNCs in dye coupling experiments, although an upregulation of gap junction communication with altered integrin-matrix interactions has previously been described for other cell types (Czyz et al. 2005; Lampe et al. 1998; Shanker et al. 2005).

In summary, asides their function as gap junction forming elements, unpaired connexons have been shown to modulate the cells’ migratory and adhesive functions whilst being in permanent crosstalk with an elaborate complex of cytoskeletal interaction partners.

Perspectives on pathology

How important the connexin-cytoskeleton interaction is, becomes elucidated in case of pathology. For instance, cadherin-cadherin interactions might be critically affected during tumour formation. The interaction normally becomes active in cell sorting mechanisms during development (Wheelock and Johnson 2003). Since, Shaw et al. (2007) have shown that Cx43 can reach adherens junctions via microtubule directed delivery, it may be suggested that gap junctions are formed preferentially with cells, expressing the same type of cadherin (Wheelock and Johnson 2003). Additional studies provide evidence, that loss of E-cadherin or upregulation of N-cadherin can increase tumour invasiveness and Cx43 downregulation in malignant cells (Mesnil 2002). It is thought that gap junction channels and their interactions with molecules such as p120 catenin, integrin and the actin cytoskeleton are important for neural crest cell migration (Xu et al. 2001, 2006), and that glioblastoma invasion of the brain parenchyma requires functional gap junctions between tumour cells and astrocytes (Lin et al. 2002). Furthermore, the migration of lung and skin cancer cells has also been associated with gap junction expression, although no clear mechanism has been proposed so far (Ito et al. 2000; Lois et al. 2002).

Developmental defects are also related to mutations of the Cx43 gene. As already indicated, Cx43 knockout mice reveal comprised conotruncal heart development, which is associated with a reduction in the number of cardiac neural crest cells targeted to the heart (Xu et al. 2006). Mutations in Cx43 which seem to influence cytoskeletal organization in a strong manner range from disease patterns like deafness, cataracts, germ cell developmental defects, ocludentodigital dysplasia to cardial outflow abnormalities (Polontchouk et al. 2002) and left ventricular remodelling (Kanno et al. 2003).

At its final extent, gap junction channels, in particular in form of hemichannels, constitute a new player in the complex interaction of cell adhesion and cytoskeletal activation, which underlies directed migration during development and in mature tissue. It is a romantic phase where anything may go, but time has to approve what will remain forever.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neuroantomy and Molecular Brain ResearchRuhr University BochumBochumGermany