Histological and immunohistochemical characterisation of conjunctival graft vs host disease following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Conjunctival graft vs host disease (cnGvHD) is a complication of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, in most cases as part of systemic GvHD. Diagnostic biopsies are commonly collected from bulbar conjunctiva only. The aims of our study were to evaluate whether additional biopsies from the tarsal conjunctiva increase sensitivity upon histopathologic evaluation and to investigate the staining profile for common immunohistochemical markers in cnGvHD. We additionally propose an adaptive histological classification for cnGvHD analogous to Lerner’s GvHD skin classification for predicting patient survival.
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded conjunctival specimens from 23 post-mortem control eyes and 42 patients after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE), periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stain and with antibodies against CD1a, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD45RO, CD68, Fas ligand, TIA-1, HLA-DRα by means of immunohistochemistry. Cell counting took place in ten representative fields at 64.4 μm (length) × 21.2 μm (width). Multifactorial analysis of variance was performed to assess any influence of cnGvHD on the staining pattern for the immunohistochemical markers. Survival times were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method.
All 42 specimens and none of the controls were diagnosed as cnGvHD. The bulbar specimens were staged according to the modified Lerner classification: grade (G) I: 0; G II: 17 (tarsal with G≤II, 2; G>II, 8); G III: 12 (tarsal with G≤III: 2; G>III: 1); G IV: 12 (tarsal with G≤IV: 6); G V: 1. The number of pairs with either the tarsal or bulbar counterpart being more severely affected was almost equal (10 vs 9). A tendency towards shorter survival in advanced bulbar cnGvHD was demonstrated (G III–V vs G I–II, p =0.06). Staining for the immunohistochemical markers in cnGvHD differed significantly from that in controls (p<0.01). Proposed markers for cnGvHD (e = epithelium, s = stroma; mean cell counts ± SD; cnGvHD vs controls) are: CD8 s (15.7 ± 18.4 vs 6 ± 5.6), CD25 s (2.6 ± 2.8 vs 0.7 ± 1.6), CD68 s (8 ± 9 vs 3.9 ± 3.5) at the bulbar site and CD1a e (1.2 ± 1.6 vs 0.3 ± 0.6) and TIA-1 e (2.2 ± 2.2 vs 1.1 ± 1.3) at the tarsal site.
Additional tarsal biopsy does not seem to add relevant diagnostic sensitivity for cnGvHD when the modified Lerner classification is applied. The modified Lerner classification of the bulbar cnGvHD seems to be of prognostic value.
- Appelbaum FR (2001) Haematopoietic cell transplantation as immunotherapy. Nature 411:385–389 CrossRef
- Bernauer W, Wright P, Dart JK, Leonard JN, Lightman S (1993) The conjunctiva in acute and chronic mucous membrane pemphigoid. An immunohistochemical analysis. Ophthalmology 100:339–346
- Bhan AK, Fujikawa LS, Foster CS (1982) T-cell subsets and Langerhans cells in normal and diseased conjunctiva. Am J Ophthalmol 94:205–212
- Boozalis GT, Pepose JS, Jabs DA et al (1987) Immunocytologic studies of the conjunctiva in graft versus host disease. Ophthalmology 94:136
- Diamond DJ, Chang KL, Jenkins KA, Forman SJ (1995) Immunohistochemical analysis of T cell phenotypes in patients with graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 59:1436–1444 CrossRef
- Hirst LW, Jabs DA, Tutschka PJ, Green, WR, Santos GW (1983) The eye in bone marrow transplantation. I. Clinical study. Arch Ophthalmol 101:580–584
- Jabs DA, Wingard J, Green WR, Farmer ER, Vogelsang G, Saral R (1989) The eye in bone marrow transplantation. III. Conjunctival graft-vs-host disease. Arch Ophthalmol 107:1343–1348
- Lerner KG, Kao GF, Storb R, Buckner CD, Clift RA, Thomas ED (1974) Histopathology of graft-vs-host reaction (GvHR) in human recipients of marrow from HLA-matched sibling donors. Transplant Proc 6:367–371
- Mittelviefhaus H, Auw-Haedrich C (2003) Corneal complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ophthalmologe 100:222–229 CrossRef
- Montan PG, Biberfeld PJ, Scheynius A (1995) IgE, IgE receptors, and other immunocytochemical markers in atopic and nonatopic patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 102:725–732
- Patey-Mariaud de Serre N, Reijasse D, Verkarre V, Canioni D, Colomb V, Haddad E, Brousse N (2002) Chronic intestinal graft-versus-host disease: clinical, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of 17 children. Bone Marrow Transplant 29:223–230 CrossRef
- Rojas B, Cuhna R, Zafirakis P, Ramirez JM, Lizan-garciia M, Zhao T, Foster CS (2005) Cell populations and adhesion molecules expression in conjunctiva before and after bone marrow transplantation. Exp Eye Res 81:313–325
- Vogelsang GB (1993) Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Curr Opin Oncol 5:276–281 CrossRef
- West RH, Szer J, Pedersen JS (1991) Ocular surface and lacrimal disturbances in chronic graft-versus-host disease: the role of conjunctival biopsy. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 19:187–191
- Histological and immunohistochemical characterisation of conjunctival graft vs host disease following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Volume 245, Issue 7 , pp 1001-1007
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Conjunctival GvHD
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Eye Hospital, Albert-Ludwigs University, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- 2. Institute of Pathology, Freiburg, Germany
- 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- 4. Department of Pathology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK