Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

, Volume 242, Issue 4, pp 313–320

Intravitreal vancomycin and amikacin versus intravenous imipenem in the treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis

Authors

  • Michael Engelbert
    • Department of OphthalmologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universität
  • Herminia Miño de Kaspar
    • Department of OphthalmologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universität
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Room A-157Stanford University, School of Medicine
  • Martin Thiel
    • Department of OphthalmologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universität
  • Thomas Grasbon
    • Department of OphthalmologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universität
  • Christopher N. Ta
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Room A-157Stanford University, School of Medicine
  • Markus Schulze-Schwering
    • Department of OphthalmologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universität
  • Volker Klauss
    • Department of OphthalmologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universität
    • Department of OphthalmologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universität
Laboratory Investigation

DOI: 10.1007/s00417-003-0767-9

Cite this article as:
Engelbert, M., Miño de Kaspar, H., Thiel, M. et al. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2004) 242: 313. doi:10.1007/s00417-003-0767-9

Abstract

Background: Controversy still surrounds the intravenous (IV) treatment of endophthalmitis. The purpose of this study was to compare IV and intraocular (IO) treatment in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis: intravitreal injection of vancomycin and amikacin (VA/AN) in comparison with IV imipenem (IPM) and a combination of IV and IO (IV+IO) therapy. Methods: The right eyes of 27 rabbits were injected with 25,000 S. aureus. After 24 h, animals were either treated with IO VA/AN (n=5; 1.0 mg/0.4 mg in 0.1 ml saline), or IV IPM (n=9; 37 mg/kg body weight 3× daily), or IV+IO therapy (n=7), or served as untreated controls (n=6). Clinical appearance was evaluated daily and vitreous aspirates were obtained for bacterial culture 24 h and 6 days after therapy, when the eyes were enucleated for histopathologic examination. Results: Eyes in the IO or IO+IV treatment group had a significantly better appearance clinically and histologically than did eyes in the IV or untreated control group. Eyes in the IO+IV group had a similar appearance to the IO-treated eyes. All aspirates from the IO and IO+IV groups were culture-negative 24 hours after therapy, whereas only five of nine in the IV-treated group were culture-negative. Aspirates from all treatment groups were culture-negative by day 6 after the initiation of therapy. Untreated control eyes were culture-positive at all times. Conclusion: IO therapy with VA/AN proved more effective in treating experimental S. aureus endophthalmitis than did IV therapy with IPM alone. IV+IO treatment was not superior to IO treatment alone.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004