Journal of Neurology

, Volume 258, Issue 4, pp 603–612

Widespread extrahippocampal NAA/(Cr+Cho) abnormalities in TLE with and without mesial temporal sclerosis

  • Susanne G. Mueller
  • Andreas Ebel
  • Jerome Barakos
  • Cathy Scanlon
  • Ian Cheong
  • Daniel Finlay
  • Paul Garcia
  • Michael W. Weiner
  • Kenneth D. Laxer
Open Access
Original Communication

DOI: 10.1007/s00415-010-5799-6

Cite this article as:
Mueller, S.G., Ebel, A., Barakos, J. et al. J Neurol (2011) 258: 603. doi:10.1007/s00415-010-5799-6

Abstract

MR spectroscopy has demonstrated extrahippocampal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions in medial temporal lobe epilepsy with (TLE-MTS) and without (TLE-no) mesial temporal sclerosis. Because of the limited brain coverage of those previous studies, it was, however, not possible to assess differences in the distribution and extent of these abnormalities between TLE-MTS and TLE-no. This study used a 3D whole brain echoplanar spectroscopic imaging (EPSI) sequence to address the following questions: (1) Do TLE-MTS and TLE-no differ regarding severity and distribution of extrahippocampal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions? (2) Do extrahippocampal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions provide additional information for focus lateralization? Forty-three subjects (12 TLE-MTS, 13 TLE-no, 18 controls) were studied with 3D EPSI. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM2) was used to identify regions of significantly decreased NAA/(Cr+Cho) in TLE groups and in individual patients. TLE-MTS and TLE-no had widespread extrahippocampal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions. NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions had a bilateral fronto-temporal distribution in TLE-MTS and a more diffuse, less well defined distribution in TLE-no. Extrahippocampal NAA/(Cr+Cho) decreases in the single subject analysis showed a large inter-individual variability and did not provide additional focus lateralizing information. Extrahippocampal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions in TLE-MTS and TLE-no are neither focal nor homogeneous. This reduces their value for focus lateralization and suggests a heterogeneous etiology of extrahippocampal spectroscopic metabolic abnormalities in TLE.

Keywords

Temporal lobe epilepsy Mesial temporal sclerosis NAA Spectroscopy 

Introduction

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common form of partial epilepsy. Two types of non-lesional medial TLE are distinguished based on imaging and histopathological findings: (1) TLE with mesial temporal lobe sclerosis (TLE-MTS, about 60–70%), which is characterized by an atrophied hippocampus with MR signal abnormalities and severe neuronal loss in the histological examination, and (2) TLE with a normal appearing hippocampus on the MRI (TLE-no, about 30–40%) and no or mild neuronal loss in the histological examination. The differences between the two TLE types, however, are not restricted to the hippocampus and its appearance in the MRI or histopathological preparation. Recent neuroimaging studies have shown that structural and functional abnormalities exist beyond the hippocampus and even beyond the temporal lobe, and that the two groups not only differ regarding severity of these abnormalities but more importantly also regarding their distribution [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. These findings, together with other crucial clinical differences between TLE-MTS and TLE-no, e.g. history of febrile seizures, age at onset of epilepsy, initial ictal zone [6] or success of epilepsy surgery [7, 8], suggest that TLE-no is more than just a milder form of TLE-MTS but eventually even a distinct entity of TLE.

MR spectroscopy allows the non-invasive measurement of N-acteyl-aspartate (NAA) (marker of neuronal viability and functionality), creatine/phosphocreatine (Cr) (marker of energy metabolism), and choline compounds (Cho) (marker of cell membrane integrity), simultaneously and thus provides information about various important aspects of the brain metabolism. The typical spectroscopic hallmark of the epileptogenic focus is an NAA reduction which is generally thought to represent mostly neuron loss [9, 10], while Cho and Cr are unchanged [11]. Using multiple single voxel spectroscopy or multi-slice spectroscopic imaging techniques, it has been shown that NAA reductions are not restricted to the focus in TLE but can be found in extrahippocampal and extratemporal regions as well [12, 13]. Because of their limited brain coverage, these previous studies were not able to conclusively assess if the distribution and/or extent of these extrafocal NAA reductions differs between TLE-MTS and TLE-no. The recent development of 3D spectroscopic imaging sequences, which provide spectroscopic information from the whole brain, has changed this [14]. Using such a sequence [15] we addressed the following specific aims: (1) Confirm the findings of previous studies showing that extrahippocampal/extratemporal NAA reductions exist in unilateral TLE and to test if TLE-MTS and TLE-no differ regarding the distribution and severity of these abnormalities. Based on recent findings in structural MRI [16], it was assumed that NAA reductions in TLE-MTS would show a mesial-temporal, temporal-posterior to occipital distribution and in TLE-no a temporo-lateral distribution. (2) Test if severity and extent of extrahippocampal NAA reductions provide additional information for focus lateralization in TLE-MTS or TLE-no. It was assumed that they would be more prominent in the hemisphere and/or lobe containing the epileptogenic focus.

Methods

Study population

The committees of human research at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco (CPMC) and VA Medical Center, San Francisco approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from each subject according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Twenty-five consecutive patients suffering from therapy resistant temporal lobe epilepsy with unilateral seizure onset who were evaluated for epilepsy surgery and agreed to undergo the additional special research imaging and spectroscopy protocol at 4 T were recruited between mid 2005 and the end of 2009 from the Pacific Epilepsy Program, CPMC and the Northern California Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, UCSF. Twelve (mean age 39.6 ± 11.5; left TLE/right TLE: 7/5, females/males 8/4) had evidence for mesial temporal lobe sclerosis (MTS) on their MRIs (TLE-MTS) and the remaining 13 (mean age 40.5 ± 9.5; left TLE/right TLE: 8/5; females/males: 7/6) had normal appearing hippocampi (TLE-no). The findings regarding presence/absence of MTS were confirmed using subfield volumetry in high resolution T2 weighted images [17]. The two groups differed regarding mean age at onset of epilepsy (TLE-MTS: 11.2 ± 10.0 years; TLE-no: 26.2 ± 12.4 years, p = 0.003) and mean duration of epilepsy (TLE-MTS: 28.9 ± 15.6 years; TLE-no: 14.8 ± 12.4 years; p = 0.02). The identification of the epileptogenic focus was based on seizure semiology and prolonged ictal and interictal Video/EEG/Telemetry (VET) in all patients. In order to qualify as unilateral TLE, all seizures (average 4.8 ± 2.4/patient) recorded during this time had to be typical for the patient, show EEG features consistent with mesial temporal onset and arise from the same side. All TLE subjects reported having been seizure free for at least 24 h before the 4 T study. The seizure frequency was determined by calculating the mean frequency/month of all seizure types recorded by the patient in the three months before the research MR exam. Table 1 displays the patient characteristics. The control population consisted of 18 healthy age-matched volunteers (mean age 33.5 ± 10.0; females/males: 13/5).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Pat no.

Age/sex

4 T MRI

Focus

Onset

Duration

Risk factors

Histo/outcome

1

35/m

L MTS L temp atrophy

L mesial temp

4

31

 

L temp/MTS/I/24

2

50/f

L MTS L temp atrophy

L mesial temp

2

49

FS

L temp/MTS/I/6

3

35/f

L MTS

L mesial temp

9

26

 

L temp/MTS/II/12

4

38/f

L MTS

L mesial temp

6

32

FS

na

5

53/f

L MTS

L mesial temp

28

26

Infection

L temp/MTS/I/6

6

32/f

L MTS

L mesial temp

24

9

Infection

L temp/MTS/IV/6

7

49/f

R MTS

R mesial temp

7

42

 

R temp/MTS/I/24

8

23/f

R MTS

R mesial temp

5

18

Infection

na

9

33/f

L MTS

L mesial temp

14

20

 

na

10

63/m

R MTS

R mesial temp

6

58

FS

na

11

32/m

R MTS

R mesial temp

28

4

 

R temp/MTS/I/9

12

32/m

R MTS, subtle WMH

R mesial temp

1

32

Infection

R temp/MTS/I/4

13

39/m

Small cyst L temp pole

L mesial temp

29

11

 

na

14

27/f

Normal

L mesial temp

10

17

 

na

15

33/f

L front WMH

L mesial temp

10

24

 

L temp/MTS/I/18

16

38/f

Normal

L mesial temp

37

2

 

na

17

22/f

Normal

R mesial temp

22

0

 

na

18

45/f

Normal

R mesial temp

31

15

 

na

19

45/m

WMH

R mesial temp

30

16

Posttrauma

R temp/norm/I/18

20

41/m

Normal

R mesial temp

40

1

Posttrauma

na

21

45/m

Normal

R mesial temp

38

8

 

na

22

57/m

Normal

L mesial temp

13

44

 

na

23

53/f

Normal

L mesial temp

47

6

 

na

24

42/f

Normal

L mesial temp

21

21

 

na

25

39/m

Normal

L mesial temp

13

27

 

L temp/norm/I/24

Age/sex age at examination/sex, f female, m male, MTS mesial temporal sclerosis at 1.5 T, Norm normal MRI at 1.5 T, R right, L left, temp temporal, WMH white matter hyperintensities, Onset age at onset, Duration duration of epilepsy, FS febrile seizure, Infection history of encephalitis/meningitis without temporal relationship to onset of seizures, perinatal perinatal complications, posttrauma mild closed head trauma in history without temporal relationship to onset of seizures, histo histology, surgery epilepsy surgery, na no. surgery, Outcome latest outcome using Engel’s classification is given in roman numerals, follow-up in months is given in arabic numerals

MRI acquisition

All studies were performed on a Bruker MedSpec 4T system controlled by a Siemens TrioTM console and equipped with a USA instruments eight channel array coil. The following sequences, which were part of a larger research imaging and spectroscopy protocol, were acquired: (1) volumetric T1-weighted gradient echo MRI (MPRAGE) TR/TE/TI = 2,300/3/950 ms, 7o flip angle, 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm3 resolution, acquisition time 5 min. (2) 3D echo planar whole brain spectroscopic imaging (EPSI) TR/TE/TI = 1,780/45/280 ms, FOV = 280 × 280 × 180 mm3 (x, y, z), spatial matrix: 50 × 50 × 18 points, spectral bandwidth = 1,667 Hz, 800 spectral points. Metabolite and water reference data was acquired in an interleaved fashion with the delay between metabolite and water reference excitations of TRWR = 550 ms. Total EPSI acquisition time: 27 min. This spectroscopic imaging sequence allows for the detection of the major brain metabolites NAA, Cr and Cho.

Postprocessing

EPSI postprocessing

A B0 map was derived from the water reference image. The water reference data was then zero-filled from 50 × 50 × 18 to 64 × 64 × 24 points, and a spatial apodization using a Gaussian filter was applied before performing of a four-dimensional spectral FT and B0 correction [18]. The resulting image was used to generate a brain mask which was applied to the metabolite data to avoid fitting of regions of no interest. The metabolite data was corrected for chemical shift artifact, echo averaged and the residual water signal was reduced by applying a finite impulse response (FIR) filter. Spectral processing of the metabolite data included zero filling to 512 points, lipid k-space extrapolation and Gaussian apodization with a line broadening of 2 Hz before performing a four-dimensional FT and spectral fitting with SITOOLS [19] (cf. Fig. 1). A binary map containing only voxels of acceptable quality (QC map) was generated using linewidth (between 3–21.3 Hz) and fit accuracy (fits with residual sum squares outside the 95 percentile distribution of residuals from all fits were rejected) [18, 20] as main criteria. Intensity images for each metabolite of interest (NAA, Cr and Cho) were derived from the fitted metabolite data and used to calculate NAA/(Cr+Cho) maps. NAA/(Cr+Cho) has been found to be very sensitive to the type of metabolic abnormality observed in TLE [13] and has (compared to single metabolite maps) the additional advantage that it does not require an intensity non uniformity correction of the spectral data. Voxels with NAA/(Cr+Cho) >4 indicating an insufficient suppression/extraction of the skull lipid signal were excluded. The final QC map was applied to the resulting ratio map to eliminate spectra with insufficient quality.
Fig. 1

Raw 3D EPSI with representative spectra from a TLE-MTS patient with a right sided focus. All displayed spectra passed the automated quality control. Spectrum 28 has been enlarged and the peaks of the main metabolites are labelled. NAAN-acetyl-aspartate, Cr creatine/phosphocreatine, Cho choline compounds

Structural image processing

All T1 images were segmented in gray, white and CSF tissue maps using expectation maximization segmentation (EMS) [21, 22].

Combination of structural and EPSI data

The T1 images were co-registered (six affine, mutual information [23]), down-sampled to the resolution of the EPSI water reference image and the resulting transformation matrices were applied to the T1 image and the gray matter map. The resulting down-sampled gray matter maps were spatially normalized to a previously generated customized symmetrical gray matter prior in ICBM (International Consortium for Brain Mapping) space using the spatial normalization algorithm in statistical parametric mapping 2 (SPM2) (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk) running MATLAB 6.1 (The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). The resulting transformations were then applied to the NAA/(Cr+Cho) map with and without QC, the QC map, the T1 image co-registered to the EPSI and the gray matter map. The resulting spatially normalized maps were re-sampled to a 1 × 1× 1 mm resolution.

Data analysis

Two approaches were used for data analysis: (1) Group analysis: each TLE subgroup was compared to the control group and with each other to identify regions with decreased NAA/(Cr+Cho). In order to allow for the combination of left and right onset TLE patients, the NAA/(Cr+Cho) maps of all right TLE were side flipped so that the hemisphere with the epileptogenic focus was on the left side in all patients. To account for physiological right/left hemispheric differences, all control NAA/(Cr+Cho) maps were also side-flipped and both versions were used for the group comparisons. (2) Single subject analysis: each individual TLE subject was compared to the control group and a map with regions of significantly reduced NAA/(Cr+Cho) generated using SPM2.

Statistical analysis

Group analysis

SPM2 was used to identify regions with significantly decreased NAA/(Cr+Cho) in TLE-MTS compared to controls, in TLE-no compared to controls, and in TLE-MTS compared to TLE-no (compare populations:1 scan/subject (ANCOVA), age as nuisance variable, threshold for significance at voxel level p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 corrected at cluster level).

Single subject analysis

SPM2 was used to localize regions of metabolic abnormalities in individual TLE subjects by performing a t test in which each TLE subject was compared with all control subjects [compare populations: 1 scan/subject (two-sample t test)]. The threshold for statistical significance was defined as p < 0.005 at voxel level and p < 0.05 at cluster level. These thresholds had been determined empirically by comparing each control with all remaining controls and then choosing the threshold at which none of the controls except one had clusters with abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho). In this control, these clusters persisted even when higher thresholds (FDR p < 0.05) were applied. The localization of each cluster was based on the coordinates of the voxel with the maximal t value. The region with the largest cluster of significantly reduced NAA/(Cr+Cho) was arbitrarily determined to represent the “focus as determined by 3D EPSI”. If the “focus as determined by 3D EPSI” was concordant with the epileptogenic temporal lobe as identified by VET, the EPSI focus identification was considered to be “correct”. EPSI identification of the epileptogenic temporal lobe instead of the hippocampus was chosen because the spectral quality in the hippocampus was often adversely affected by the susceptibility artifacts typical for the basal temporal lobe. This resulted in the loss of the spectra from the head and anterior two-thirds of the body of the hippocampus (on average 26±14% of the hippocampal voxels fulfilled the quality criteria), i.e., the region where previous studies had shown the most prominent abnormalities in TLE [11]. Because of this, spectral information from the hippocampal tail was lumped together with the temporal lobe for “focus determination by EPSI”. Mann–Whitney tests and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare indices of epilepsy severity and EPSI brain coverage between TLE with and without clusters of abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho). Holms’ test was used to correct for multiple comparisons.

Results

Group analysis

Figure 2 displays the results of the group analysis. NAA/(Cr+Cho) abnormalities in TLE-MTS had a bilateral temporo-occipital distribution. Additional prominent abnormalities were present in both frontal lobes. NAA/(Cr+Cho) abnormalities in TLE-no were more diffuse and less well-defined and were most prominent in the temporo-insular and bilateral frontal regions. The direct comparisons between TLE-MTS and TLE-no showed no significant differences at the chosen significance threshold.
Fig. 2

Regions with significant decreased NAA/(Cr+Cho) in TLE-MTS compared to controls (upper two panels) and TLE-no compared to controls (lower two panels). Abnormalities in TLE-MTS were most prominent in the bilateral temporal lobes but extended also into posterior occipital and frontal regions. Abnormalities in TLE-no were more diffuse, less distinct and preferentially in bilateral frontal, temporal-insular regions. Similarly, as in the single subject analysis, there was no clear predominance of the NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions in the ipsilateral hemisphere in either group

Single subject analysis

Figure 3 displays the results of the single subject analysis for two typical TLE-MTS and two typical TLE-no. Table 2 shows the results for each subject. Three TLE-MTS and five TLE-no had no clusters with significant NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions. The remaining nine TLE-MTS had 1–5 clusters with abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho) [average number (No) of clusters: 2.7; median cluster size: 93,021 (range 1,193–602,663 voxels; median size of largest cluster: 4,515 (range 1,193–5,85,555 voxels)], and the remaining eight TLE-no had 1–7 clusters with abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho) [average No of clusters: 4.0; median cluster size: 11,287 (range 1,638–49,841) voxels; median size of largest cluster: 4,828 (range 1,638–26,961 voxels)]. TLE-MTS and TLE-no did not differ from each other regarding number of abnormal NAA/(Cr+Cho) clusters nor regarding the size of these clusters or size of the largest cluster.
Fig. 3

Representative results of the single subject analysis. The two TLE-MTS had large ipsilateral temporal clusters which extended in neighboring regions. There were also smaller clusters in the frontal lobes. The two TLE-no in general had smaller and more diffusely distributed clusters

Table 2

Results of single subject analysis

Pat no.

Group

No. cluster

Size cluster

Side

Lobe

1

MTS

0

0

na

na

2

MTS

2

4,515

Contra

Frontal

2,081

IPSI

Temporal

3

MTS

5

35,365

IPSI

Temporal

2,258

Contra

Temporal

1,408

IPSI

Frontal

2,342

Contra

Frontal

1,420

IPSI

Parietal

4

MTS

1

1,193

Contra

Temporal

5

MTS

1

1,652

Contra

Temporal

6

MTS

0

0

na

na

7

MTS

5

9,708

IPSI

Frontal

97,853

IPSI

Temporal

12,774

Contra

Frontal

1,784

Contra

Temporal

5,487

Contra

Frontal

8

MTS

1

1,295

IPSI

Temporal

9

MTS

1

2,481

Contra

Temporal

10

MTS

4

15,170

Contra

Frontal

21,965

IPSI

Temporal

3,773

Contra

Temporal

10,002

Contra

Parietal

11

MTS

4

6,609

IPSI

Frontal

1,350

Contra

Frontal

585,555

IPSI

Temporal

9,149

Contra

Temporal

12

MTS

0

0

na

na

13

Norm

7

2,966

Contra

Insula

1,147

Contra

Temporal

1,303

IPSI

Frontal

7,799

Contra

Parietal

6,211

IPSI

Occipital

1,326

Contra

Frontal

2,239

IPSI

Temporal

14

Norm

1

1,638

Contra

Insula

15

Norm

0

0

na

na

16

Norm

5

1,740

Contra

Occipital

1,792

Contra

Frontal

1,269

IPSI

Frontal

1,257

Contra

Temporal

1,587

IPSI

Occipital

17

Norm

4

6,625

Contra

Insula

2,062

IPSI

Insula

2,625

IPSI

Frontal

3,121

Bi

Frontal

18

Norm

0

0

na

Na

19

Norm

3

2,518

IPSI

Frontal

2,708

Contra

Parietal

2,915

Contra

Frontal

20

Norm

0

0

na

Na

21

Norm

4

2,532

IPSI

Frontal

5,813

Contra

Occipital

7,243

Contra

Frontal

1,365

IPSI

Temporal

22

Norm

1

3,030

IPSI

Occipital

23

Norm

7

2,400

Contra

Frontal

18,384

IPSI

Occipital

3,983

Contra

Frontal

18,552

Contra

Temporal

3,102

Bi

Frontal

2,228

Bi

Frontal

1,192

IPSI

Frontal

24

Norm

0

0

na

na

25

Norm

0

0

na

na

IPS ipsilateral, Contra contralateral, Bi bilateral, MTS mesial temporal sclerosis, Norm normal, No. cluster number of clusters, Size cluster number of voxels with abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho) in the cluster, bold cluster which fulfill criterion for “focus as identified by EPSI” and are concordant with EEG identification of the focus

The largest cluster of abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho) was in the ipsilateral temporal lobe in five TLE-MTS. In the remaining four TLE-MTS, the largest cluster with abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho) was either in the contralateral temporal lobe (n = 3) or contralateral (n = 1) frontal lobe. In seven TLE-no the largest cluster with abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho) was found in the contralateral hemisphere (frontal: 3; insula: 2; parietal: 1, temporal: 1) and in one it was found in the ipsilateral occipital lobe.

Temporal lobe epilepsy with abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho) did not differ from TLE with NAA/(Cr+Cho) within the normal range regarding mean duration of epilepsy (22.3 ± 17.5 vs. 20.3 ± 10.9 years, p = 0.74), age at onset of epilepsy (19.5 ± 13.8 vs. 18.0 ± 13.5) occurrence of secondary generalized seizures (23.5 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.47), occurrence of risk factors for epilepsy (35.3 vs. 37.5%, p = 0.71), seizures/month (7.5 ± 15.3 vs. 11.9 ± 14.8, p = 0.52) or % brain coverage by 3DEPSI (35.1 ± 8.2 vs. 39.3 ± 4.3%, p = 0.19).

Discussion

There were three major findings in this study: (1) Ipsi- and contralateral temporal and extratemporal regions with abnormally low NAA/(Cr+Cho) were found in TLE-MTS and TLE-no. The extent of these NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions varied between subjects even within the same subgroup. Factors that might influence the expression of these abnormalities, e.g., seizure frequency, type, were not different between TLE with and without widespread NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions. (2) The high degree of interindividual heterogeneity and variability of the metabolic abnormalities complicated the identification of a distinct pattern of NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions in each of the two TLE subgroups. Although the visual inspection of the TLE vs. control comparisons suggested a predominantly temporal-frontal distribution of the NAA/(Cr+Cho) decreases in TLE-MTS and a more diffuse, less distinct distribution in TLE-no (cf. Fig. 2), the two TLE groups were not significantly different from each other in the direct comparison. (3) Extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) abnormalities did not provide additional information for focus lateralization in TLE-MTS or in TLE-no. Taken together, this study provides evidence that at least metabolically non-lesional TLE is neither a focal nor a homogeneous disease.

Etiology of extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions

The first finding of this study was the confirmation of the widespread, bilateral extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions in TLE-MTS and TLE-no which had been described by previous spectroscopic imaging studies with partial brain coverage [12, 13]. The etiology of these extrahippocampal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions in TLE is unknown. NAA decreases in the hippocampus are usually thought to be caused by neuron loss and/or neuronal dysfunction [9]. The fact that hippocampal NAA decreases have been found to be useful for focus lateralization in TLE [24] suggests that they are stable over time, at least in the epileptogenic hippocampus. Neuronal loss and neuronal dysfunction could also explain the extrahippocampal and extratemporal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions found in this study. In analogy to the focus, local excitotoxic effects of spreading epileptogenic activity could lead to neuronal loss in extrafocal regions. In that case it could be expected that the resulting NAA/(Cr+Cho) abnormalities are associated with structural abnormalities/volume loss. Widespread cortical thinning in TLE-MTS and TLE-no with a similar distribution as the NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions described here has indeed recently been demonstrated in a study from this lab [16]. Extrafocal neuronal dysfunction could be caused by deafferentation due to loss of input from the focus, or by excitotoxic effects of seizure spread too mild to result in neuronal loss. The best evidence that NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions due to neuronal dysfunction exist in TLE comes from the observation that reduced NAA in the contralateral hippocampus often returns to normal levels after successful surgery [25, 26]. However, the observation that some of the extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) abnormalities are reversible also indicates that the severity and extent of these NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions are not necessarily stable over time. Longitudinal studies correlating extrahippocampal/extratemporal NAA/(Cr+Cho) changes with structural abnormalities and clinical variables, such as seizure frequency between exams, will be necessary to explore in which regions extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions are stable over time and correspond to an irreversible neuron loss, and in which regions they fluctuate and indicate neuronal dysfunction.

High intersubject variability of NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions in TLE-MTS and TLE-no

The single subject analysis showed a wide range of these extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions even within the same TLE group with some being metabolically completely normal while others had severe, widespread abnormalities. The high degree of intersubject variability of NAA/(Cr+Cho) abnormalities and the relatively small population sizes made it difficult to identify a distinct pattern of metabolic abnormalities in each of the TLE-subgroups (cf. Fig. 2). The most obvious explanation for the variability of NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions between patients would be differences in severity and duration of the epileptic disorder. Several studies have described a relationship between structural abnormalities and duration of epilepsy [27, 28]. Therefore, it could be expected that TLE patients with a longer duration of epilepsy, more frequent and/or more severe seizures (occurrence of secondary generalized seizures) have more severe NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions than subjects with less frequent and/or milder seizures or who developed seizures later in life. However, the direct comparison of metabolically normal TLE with metabolically abnormal TLE provided no evidence that any of these factors had an influence on the severity of the NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions. Technical issues which could have caused such variations artificially, i.e., differences in % brain coverage between metabolically normal and abnormal subjects resulting in the exclusion of regions with reduced NAA/(Cr+Cho) in the former but inclusion in the latter, also seem unlikely since % brain coverage was not different between subjects with normal EPSI and those with abnormal EPSI. There are, of course, a multitude of other potential factors which alone or in combination might explain the wide range of NAA/(Cr+Cho) abnormalities observed in non-lesional TLE, e.g., interval between last seizure and scan [29], type of the last seizure [30], type of antiepileptic medication, different individual vulnerability for effects of epileptogenic activity in non epileptogenic brain tissue, etc. Longitudinal studies in a larger patient population might help to identify the factors contributing to this variability.

Value of extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions for focus lateralization

The lateralizing information provided by NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions in individual TLE-MTS patients was minimal. Only 42% of the TLE-MTS had the largest cluster of reduced NAA/(Cr+Cho) in the ipsilateral temporal lobe and the hemispheric NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions were not significantly different between the ipsi- and contralateral hemispheres. The lateralizing information was even worse for TLE-no. There were no significant ipsi-/contralateral hemispheric differences and the largest cluster of low NAA/(Cr+Cho) were in all cases extratemporal. Based on this, it can be concluded that extrahippocampal/extratemporal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions do not provide additional information for focus lateralization. Further study will be needed to address the question if the extent and distribution of these extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions might be useful to predict post-surgical seizure control or cognitive impairment.

Technical limitations

The study has limitations: (1) Loss of spectral data affected particularly the basal and mesial temporal lobe, i.e., regions which are prominently affected in TLE. Therefore, we may have missed significant temporal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions providing lateralizing information. This might also explain why four patients (Pat No 4, 5, 9, 14) had only contralateral abnormalities. Future studies should combine 3D EPSI with a single slice hippocampal measurement to ensure that data is also consistently collected from these regions. (2) For the reasons outlined in the methodological sections, we used NAA/(Cr+Cho) maps and not single metabolite maps. Therefore, we cannot exclude that some of the metabolic abnormalities were caused by elevated Cho and/or Cr concentrations rather than by NAA decreases. (3) The study population was small and so lack of statistical power might be responsible for some of the negative findings, e.g., such as not finding significant ipsi-/contralateral differences. (4) All patients were recruited from tertiary care centers where they were evaluated for epilepsy surgery. These patients were probably suffering from a more severe form of TLE and, thus, may not be representative for non-lesional TLE in general. It will therefore be necessary to replicate the findings in a larger, more diverse TLE population. In addition to duration of epilepsy, seizure frequency, etc., future studies should also address the influence of other factors on extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions, e.g., contribution of antiepileptic treatment, correlation with extent of EEG abnormalities.

Conclusion

This study confirmed the findings of previous spectroscopic imaging studies which demonstrated wide spread extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) abnormalities in TLE-MTS and TLE-no. The finding that extrafocal NAA/(Cr+Cho) reductions show a considerable individual variation in extent and severity within each of the subtypes demonstrates that a homogeneous pattern of neuronal dysfunction/neuronal loss does not exist in either TLE-MTS or TLE-no. Further studies will be necessary to obtain a better understanding of the nature of these metabolic abnormalities and of their influence on cognitive performance and long term outcome after epilepsy surgery.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health grant RO1-NS31966 to K.D.L. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne G. Mueller
    • 1
    • 4
  • Andreas Ebel
    • 1
  • Jerome Barakos
    • 2
  • Cathy Scanlon
    • 1
  • Ian Cheong
    • 1
  • Daniel Finlay
    • 1
  • Paul Garcia
    • 3
  • Michael W. Weiner
    • 1
  • Kenneth D. Laxer
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Department of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Pacific Epilepsy ProgramCalifornia Pacific Medical CenterSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Medical CenterCenter for Imaging of Neurodegenerative DiseasesSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations