Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation risk estimates after radiotherapy: application of the organ equivalent dose concept to plateau dose–response relationships

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimates of secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy are becoming more important for comparative treatment planning. Modern treatment planning systems provide accurate three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions for each individual patient. The dose distributions can be converted into organ equivalent doses to describe radiation-induced cancer after radiotherapy (OEDrad-ther) in the irradiated organs. The OEDrad-ther concept assumes that any two dose distributions in an organ are equivalent if they cause the same radiation-induced cancer risk. In this work, this concept is applied to dose–response relationships, which are leveling off at high dose. The organ-dependent operational parameter of this dose–response relationship was estimated by analyzing secondary cancer incidence data of patients with Hodgkin’s disease. The dose distributions of a typical radiotherapy treatment plan for treating Hodgkin’s disease was reconstructed. Dose distributions were calculated in individual organs from which cancer incidence data were available. The model parameter was obtained by comparing dose and cancer incidence rates for the individual organs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall EJ. Henry S. (2004) The crooked shall be made straight; dose-response relationships for carcinogenesis (Kaplan Distinguished Scientist Award 2003). Int J Radiat Biol 80(5):327–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schneider U, Zwahlen D, Ross D, Kaser-Hotz B (2005) Estimation of radiation induced cancer from 3D-dose distributions: concept of organ equivalent dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:1510–1515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. ICRP (1991) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP 21(1-3). Pergamon, Oxford

  4. Schneider U, Kaser-Hotz B (2005) A simple dose-response relationship for modelling secondary cancer incidence after radiotherapy. Z Med Phys 15(1):31–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Broerse JJ. (1999) Radiation induced cancer in animals. In: Baumstark-Khan C et al. (ed) Fundamentals for the assessment of risks from environmental radiation. Kluver, Dordrecht, pp. 379–388

  6. Mole RH (1984) Dose-response relationships. In: Boice JD, Fraumeni JF (eds) Radiation carcinogenesis: epidemiology and biological significance. Raven, New York pp. 403–420

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hall EJ, Wuu CS (2003) Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56(1):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis RH (2004) Production and killing of second cancer precursor cells in radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(3):916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schneider U (2005) Dose-response relationship for radiation-induced cancer-decrease or plateau at high dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61(1):312–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. UNSCEAR (2000) Report to the general assembly, sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Volume II: Effects, Annex I: Epidemiological evaluation of radiation-induced cancer. http://www.unscear.org/reports/2000_2.html

  11. Thomson D, Mabuchi K, Ron E, Soda M, Tokunaga M, Ochikubo S, Sugimoto S, Ikeda T, Terasaki M, Izumi S, Preston D (1994) Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958-1987. Rad Res 137:S17–S67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van Leeuwen FE, Travis LB (2001) Second cancers. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 2939–2964

    Google Scholar 

  13. Preston D, Shimizu Y, Pierce D, Suyama A, Mabuchi K (2003) Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997. Rad Res 160:381–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van Leeuwen FE, Klokman WJ, Veer MB, et al (2000) Long-term risk of second malignancy in survivors of Hodgkin’s disease treated during adolescence or young adulthood. J Clin Oncol 18:487–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zubal IG, Harrell CR, Smith EO, et al. (1994) Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. Med Phys 21(2):299–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mauch PM, Leslie AK, Kadin M, et al. (1993) Patterns of presentation of Hodgkin disease. Cancer. 71(6):2062–2071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoppe RT (1990) Radiation therapy in the management of Hodgkin’s disease. Semin Oncol 17(6):704–715

    PubMed  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the editor Dr. Werner Rühm for his helpful comments and ideas during revision of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Schneider.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, U., Kaser-Hotz, B. Radiation risk estimates after radiotherapy: application of the organ equivalent dose concept to plateau dose–response relationships. Radiat Environ Biophys 44, 235–239 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-005-0016-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-005-0016-1

Keywords

Navigation