Date: 17 Oct 2013
Mesh implantation for pelvic organ prolapse improves quality of life
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The use of alloplastic meshes for repair of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has recently been discussed for its indications and safety. Mesh exposure and chronic pelvic pain are among the risks that need to be addressed to the patients. The purpose of this prospective observational study is to investigate the effect of vaginal mesh implantation on pelvic floor-related quality of life (QoL).
55 patients were included in this prospective multicenter study. A validated QoL questionnaire comprising items on prolapse symptoms and bladder, bowel and sexual function was used. QoL data were acquired before and 1 year after POP surgery. Patients underwent POP surgery with implantation of either Prolift® or Seratom® mesh.
Quality of life scores improved significantly after surgery. Prolapse complaints were reduced from 4.43 to 0.26 (p < 0.001), and bladder and bowel complaints improved from 3.03 to 1.46 (p < 0.001) and from 1.93 to 1.60 (p < 0.01) at follow-up. Furthermore, the sexual function score improved from 2.31 to 1.12 postoperatively (p < 0.01).
Despite the risks discussed for vaginal mesh repair, we observed a statistically significant improvement of pelvic floor-related quality of life of POP patients.
Whitcomb EL et al (2009) Prevalence and degree of bother from pelvic floor disorders in obese women. Int Urogynecol J 20(3):289–294CrossRef
Nieminen K et al (2008) Symptom resolution and sexual function after anterior vaginal wall repair with or without polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J 19(12):1611–1616CrossRef
Maher C, Baessler K (2006) Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence based literature review. Int Urogynecol J 17(2):195–201CrossRef
Fatton B et al (2007) Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift™ technique)—a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J 18(7):743–752CrossRef
Solà Dalenz V et al (2007) Treatment of female genital prolapse with Prolift system. Acta Urol Esp 31(8):850–857CrossRef
Cosson M et al (2005) Prolift mesh (Gynecare) for pelvic organ prolapse surgical treatment using the TVM group technique: a retrospective study of 687 patients. Neurourol Urodyn 24(5/6):121
Baessler K (2006) Psychometrische Validierung eines umfassenden Beckenboden-fragebogens für Klinik, Praxis und Forschung. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 67(S1):01–10
Butler R et al (1994) Love and sex after 60: how to evaluate and treat the sexually-active woman. Geriatrics 49(11):33PubMed
Aungst MJ et al (2009) De novo stress incontinence and pelvic muscle symptoms after transvaginal mesh repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(1):73 e1–7PubMed
- Mesh implantation for pelvic organ prolapse improves quality of life
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume 289, Issue 4 , pp 817-821
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Additional Links
- Pelvic organ prolapse
- Polypropylene mesh
- Quality of life
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital of Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
- 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diakonie Hospital, Freiburg, Germany
- 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany