Delivery outcomes in women undergoing elective labor induction at term
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To determine elective induction of labor outcomes in term, low-risk women who delivered in a community teaching hospital.
This is a retrospective cohort study of women admitted from January 1, 2006 to January 31, 2010, for elective induction of labor. A comprehensive search of the perinatal database identified low-risk patients at ≥39 weeks gestation and ≤41 weeks with singleton pregnancies in vertex presentation. Data abstracted from manual chart review included patient demographics, admission cervical examination, and induction method. Outcome measures were delivery method and cesarean indications. Time categories calculated were mean times from induction to delivery, delivery to discharge, and total hospital length-of-stay. Descriptive statistics, frequencies, and percentages were reported using multiple regression analysis, analysis of variance, and effect tests with respective values reported. Data were analyzed using JMP software by SAS Institute Inc.
Of the 1,159 women identified, 848 records passed exclusion criteria. Vaginal delivery was accomplished for 694 (81.8 %) of patients. The most common induction agent was oxytocin (73.7 %). Induction of labor with oxytocin and artificial rupture of membranes revealed a statistically significant shorter length of induction with average induction of labor for oxytocin of 11.9 h. Multiparous patients of parity >1 and patients presenting with cervical dilation of 3–4 cm had a statistically significant higher probability of vaginal delivery. Patients induced with a foley bulb or dinoprostone had statistically longer induction times (28.2 and 24.9 h, respectively) and had a statistically significant higher probability of cesarean delivery.
Multiparous patients and patients with a favorable cervix (>2 cm) were more likely to have a vaginal delivery and shorter length of induction.
- Crane, JM (2006) Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49: pp. 573-581 CrossRef
- Beebe, LA, Rayburn, WF, Beaty, CM, Eberly, KL, Stanley, JR, Rayburn, LA (2000) Indications for labor induction. Differences between university and community hospitals. J Reprod Med 45: pp. 469-475
- Rayburn, W, Zhang, J (2002) Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 100: pp. 164-167 CrossRef
- Clark, SL, Miller, DD, Belfort, MA (2009) Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200: pp. 156-158
- Vrouenraets, FP, Roumen, FJ, Dehing, CJ (2005) Bishop Score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 105: pp. 690 CrossRef
- Luthy, DA, Malmgren, JA, Zingheim, RW (2004) Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: pp. 1511 CrossRef
- Baacke, KA (2006) Preinduction Cervical Assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49: pp. 564-571 CrossRef
- Vahratian, A, Zhang, J, Troendle, JF (2005) Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 105: pp. 698-704 CrossRef
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 114: pp. 386-397 CrossRef
- Seyb, ST, Berka, RJ, Socol, ML (1999) Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 94: pp. 600-607 CrossRef
- Zhang, J, Yancy, MK, Henderson, CE (2002) National trends in labor induction, 1989–1998. JRM 47: pp. 120-124
- Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, Ventura, SJ, Menacker, F, Kirmeyer, S (2009) Births: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 57: pp. 1-102
- Delivery outcomes in women undergoing elective labor induction at term
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume 287, Issue 3 , pp 407-411
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Elective induction
- Industry Sectors