The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Leyendecker, G., Wildt, L. & Mall, G. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2009) 280: 529. doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1191-0
- 2.5k Views
This study presents a unifying concept of the pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis. In particular, a physiological model is proposed that provides a comprehensive explanation of the local production of estrogen at the level of ectopic endometrial lesions and the endometrium of women affected with the disease.
In women suffering from endometriosis and adenomyosis and in normal controls, a critical analysis of uterine morphology and function was performed using immunohistochemistry, MRI, hysterosalpingoscintigraphy, videohysterosonography, molecular biology as well as clinical aspects. The relevant molecular biologic aspects were compared to those of tissue injury and repair (TIAR) mechanisms reported in literature.
Results and conclusions
Circumstantial evidence suggests that endometriosis and adenomyosis are caused by trauma. In the spontaneously developing disease, chronic uterine peristaltic activity or phases of hyperperistalsis induce, at the endometrial–myometrial interface near the fundo-cornual raphe, microtraumatizations with the activation of the mechanism of ‘tissue injury and repair’ (TIAR). This results in the local production of estrogen. With ongoing peristaltic activity, such sites might increase and the increasingly produced estrogens interfere in a paracrine fashion with the ovarian control over uterine peristaltic activity, resulting in permanent hyperperistalsis and a self-perpetuation of the disease process. Overt auto-traumatization of the uterus with dislocation of fragments of basal endometrium into the peritoneal cavity and infiltration of basal endometrium into the depth of the myometrial wall ensues. In most cases of endometriosis/adenomyosis, a causal event early in the reproductive period of life must be postulated leading rapidly to uterine hyperperistalsis. In late premenopausal adenomyosis, such an event might not have occurred. However, as indicated by the high prevalence of the disease, it appears to be unavoidable that, with time, chronic normoperistalsis throughout the reproductive period of life leads to the same extent of microtraumatization. With the activation of the TIAR mechanism followed by infiltrative growth and chronic inflammation, endometriosis/adenomyosis of the younger woman and premenopausal adenomyosis share in principle the same pathophysiology. In conclusion, endometriosis and adenomyosis result from the physiological mechanism of ‘tissue injury and repair’ (TIAR) involving local estrogen production in an estrogen-sensitive environment normally controlled by the ovary.
KeywordsEndometriosisAdenomyosisEndometrial estrogenTissue injury and repairChronic inflammation
Endometriosis is a disease that affects many women predominantly during the reproductive period of life. With the cardinal symptoms, such as pelvic pain, bleeding disorders, and infertility, the disease has a tremendous impact on women’s well-being and health. In most of the women affected the first symptoms can be traced back to adolescence . Many women, however, remain free of symptoms or exhibit only minor complaints. Moreover, in cases with the development of the disease after childbearing, the condition may remain undiagnosed. Not infrequently, at laparoscopy for tubal sterilization  and hysterectomy for fibroids and adenomyosis, endometriotic implants and scars, respectively, can be observed. Thus, the current estimates of prevalence are probably too low. The syndrome of dislocated basal endometrium (SDBE), a term that comprises the pathophysiological continuum of endometriosis, endometriosis in association with adenomyosis and premenopausal adenomyosis, thus appears to be a very common phenomenon . We had, therefore, a decade ago, suggested that its cause or causes may be unspectacular and closely related to the physiologic process of reproduction. Trauma followed by tissue specific hyper reactive inflammatory response and repair involving specific, albeit physiological cellular, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms may be considered the major events in the development of the disease .
In this article, an attempt is made to extend our previous views and to elaborate a comprehensive model of the pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis. This endeavor is undertaken with the premise that all phenotypes of endometriosis share in principal the same pathophysiology and that no parallel and separate mechanisms of their development do exist. This does, however, not exclude various and different etiologies at the very onset of the disease process including iatrogenic , exogenous [6, 7], and hereditary  factors. With respect to hereditary factors they might be remote from the genuine disease process and thus not easily to disclose.
The role of the uterus in the disease process
In the understanding of the pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis a re-analysis of both, structure and function of the non-pregnant uterus turned out to be of utmost importance [4, 9–11]. With uterine peristalsis and directed (sperm) transport a novel uterine function has been discovered [12–19]. It became evident that the non-pregnant uterus is constantly active throughout the reproductive period of life and thereby, like other mechanically active organs of the body such as the skeletal and the cardiovascular systems, respectively, rather inevitably subjected to mechanical strain. Research performed over the last years has demonstrated a crucial role of mechanical strain in normal and pathological function of various tissues. Moreover, it became apparent that the molecular mechanisms associated with mechanical strain, injury, and repair displays a pattern that is quite similar in different tissues and involves the expression of the P450 aromatase and the local production of estrogen . The sequels of tissue injury and repair, however, may become very specific depending on structure and functions of the tissues and organs involved such as tendons and cartilage in the skeletal and the intima in the cardiovascular system, respectively. This is of particular importance, when the tissue, as it is the case with the uterus, is physiologically highly estrogen sensitive and when injury is chronic in character.
Fragments of basal endometrium were found in the menstrual effluent with a higher prevalence in women with endometriosis than in controls. On the basis of these and other findings, it was suggested that pelvic endometriosis results from the transtubal dislocation of fragments of basal endometrium .
There is a significant association of pelvic endometriosis with uterine adenomyosis in women and in the baboon with life-long infertility. In women, the reported prevalence, however, differs according to the study population chosen and to the criteria applied to the interpretation of MRI findings [22–26].
In comparison to normal controls and in contrast to peripheral blood estradiol levels are elevated in menstrual blood of women with endometriosis and adenomyosis .
The peristaltic activity of the subendometrial myometrium can be dramatically increased by elevated peripheral levels of estradiol as they are observed during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. The intensity of uterine peristaltic activity in women with endometriosis resembles that of women during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation although the peripheral estradiol levels are within the normal range [4, 29, 44].
The enigma of archimetral hyperestrogenism
The local production of estrogen both on the level of the eutopic endometrium in women with endometriosis and of the ectopic lesions is, undoubtedly, central to the understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease. The etiology of this increased estrogen-producing “glandular” potential of these tissues, however, is still enigmatic. It was recently suggested that the susceptibility of developing the disease with the potential to locally produce estrogen within the eutopic endometrium would be acquired by an epigenetic mechanisms during prenatal life that would become manifested not until after puberty . Other authors suggest that the endometrium in women with endometriosis is inherently altered . Clinical and experimental evidence do not support these views. If primary alterations of the endometrium were a prerequisite of the development of the disease it would not be possible, in the primate model, to induce peritoneal endometriosis by inoculation of endometrial fragments that were obtained from endometrial biopsies of healthy animals [43, 46–48]. Moreover, abdominal wall endometriosis following cesarean section develops in presumably primarily healthy subjects.
Tissue injury and repair (TIAR)
Mechanism of disease: uterine auto-traumatization
Structure and function of the subendometrial myometrium and the endocrine control of directed sperm transport have been described elsewhere [9, 15, 44, 45, 63, 64]. It is comprehensible that the myometrial fibers and the fibroblast at the endometrial–myometrial interface near the fundo-cornual raphe are subjected to increased mechanical strain during midcycle, because not only the ovarian estradiol secretion is at its peak at that time, but also the additional mechanical strain is imposed on these cells due to estradiol that reaches the uterus via the utero-ovarian counter-current system and controls the direction of the upward transport . Directed sperm transport begins during the mid-follicular phase of the cycle when the dominant follicle becomes visible . The fundo-cornual raphe as a site of predilection of mechanical strain is documented by the observation that early adenomyosis usually evolves in the sagittal midline of the mid-corporal and fundal part of the uterus (Fig. 2). Even in more advanced cases of adenomyosis the expansion of the junctional zone in MRI often shows preponderance at these locations .
First step injury: microtraumatization
Experiments with cultivated fibroblasts have shown that mechanical strain within certain limits is physiological to such cells. However, even minor increments in mechanical strain resulted and the activation of COX-2 and the production of PGE2, the basic biochemical mechanisms underlying tissue injury , and also in the production of interleukin-8 . Thus, with respect to the subendometrial myometrium, deviations from the normal cyclic endocrine pattern with increases or prolongations of estradiol stimulation of uterine peristalsis could impose supraphysiological mechanical strain on the cells near the fundo-cornual raphe. It has been attempted to relate irregularities of the menstrual cycle to the development of endometriosis without clear-cut evidence . The irregularities under discussion, however, are not easily disclosed and might escape self-observation and recording of patient history. It is tempting to speculate that events such as prolonged follicular phases, anovulatory cycles or periods of follicular persistency and also the presence of large antral follicles in both ovaries before definite selection of the dominant follicle would impose, by increased or prolonged estrogenic stimulation, stronger mechanical strain to the muscular fibers and fibroblasts. That a prolonged period of estrogenic stimulation might promote the development of endometriosis is documented in a study aiming at examining the hereditary component of endometriosis in colonized rhesus monkeys. Only a history of application of estrogen patches (in addition to a history of trauma by hysterotomy) showed a significant association with endometriosis . The cyclic irregularities discussed above, that might have also a hereditary background, occur frequently during the early period of reproductive life. This concurs with an early onset of endometriosis in most cases. But also other factors should be taken into consideration that might increase the susceptibility to mechanical strain and tissue injury.
In any event, repeated and sustained overstretching and injury of the myocytes and fibroblasts at the endometrial–myometrial interface close to the fundo-cornual raphe would activate the TIAR system focally with increased local production of estradiol. This process starts on a microscopical level and complete healing might be possible particularly if the mechanical strain with subsequent tissue injury happened to be only a singular event or followed by a longer phase of uterine quiescence such as during pregnancy and breastfeeding.
During such a singular phase of ‘first-step’ injury, transtubal dislocation of fragments of basal endometrium might occur. In addition to the very low probability of transtubal seeding of fragments of the basal endometrium in normal women, such single events could contribute to the development of asymptomatic pelvic endometriosis [2, 3, 21]. In case of accidental implantation at an unfavorable site, such as the ovaries, severe intraperitoneal endometriosis could develop without further involvement of the uterus in the disease process as indicated by a completely normal junctional zone in MRI.
Second step injury: auto-traumatization by hyperperistalsis
Pelvic endometriosis has been described in adolescent girls prior to menarche and coelomic metaplasia had been suggested as the underlying mechanism . Large antral follicles are observed in the ovaries of premenarcheal girls that might stimulate uterine peristalsis . Thus, detachment and upward transport of fragments of basal endometrium from the more or less unstimulated endometrium in these girls has to be considered as well.
In this respect, the significance of menstruation in the disease process  should be more precisely defined. During menstruation the basal endometrium is maximally exposed. This facilitates, in the presence of hyperperistalsis, both, the detachment of fragments of basal endometrium and their upward transport [21, 29, 33].
Iatrogenic traumata to the uterus are considered to increase the risk for the development of endometriosis and adenomyosis . A history of hysterotomy in colonized rhesus monkeys showed a significant association with the later development of endometriosis in these animals . The underlying mechanism of induction of endometriosis by iatrogenic trauma such as curettage and other ablative techniques appears to be very similar to those described above. Such surgical interventions might result in extended lesions with an enhanced TIAR reaction. The rapidly increasing local estrogen levels during the process of healing interfere with the ovarian control over uterine peristaltic activity leading rapidly to second step injury with ensuing auto-traumatization and perpetuation of the disease process. Thus, within the context of our model, iatrogenic lesions that result in the development of endometriosis and adenomyosis can be viewed as strong one-time ‘first-step’ injuries. In the baboon model experimental endometriosis was induced by inoculation of endometrial fragments that were obtained by endometrial biopsies during the menstrual phase of the animals. In the endometriotic lesions Cyr61, a highly estrogen dependent gene, was soon up-regulated . Surprisingly, Cyr61 started to be up-regulated also in the eutopic endometrium of these primarily healthy animals. Most probably, the activation of Cyr61 in the eutopic endometrium resulted from the activation of the TIAR system with local production of estrogen following tissue injury that was caused by the biopsy rather than from a ‘cross-talk’ between the endometriotic lesions and the eutopic endometrium as suggested by the authors.
The eutopic endometrium in endometriosis and the endometriotic lesions
In both, the endometriotic lesions and in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis, the cellular and molecular components of the regulatory systems that enable the tissue to produce estradiol have been demonstrated to be expressed. While this has been convincingly shown for peritoneal lesions, data concerning the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis are unequivocal in this respect.
Fragments of basal endometrium constitute injured tissue. The expression of acute and inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β and interleukin 6 and also interleukin-8 [65, 74] facilitate implantation. As auto-transplants, however, the fragments should implant without inflammatory sequels. Due to the cyclic strain imposed upon the peritoneal endometriotic lesions the TIAR system is repeatedly and chronically activated. Immunohistochemistry has demonstrated also a dramatic up-regulation of the estradiol receptor alpha . In superficial lesions this chronic inflammatory process might calm down and healing might be possible . Deeply infiltrating lesions develop at sites that are in addition subjected to chronic mechanical irritation such as the recto-sigmoid fixed to the pelvic wall or uterus, the sacro-uterine ligaments, the urinary bladder, ovaries fixed to the pelvic wall, the recto-vaginal septum as well as the abdominal wall. It appears that chronic trauma to the ectopic lesions maintains the inflammatory process and results in the same tissue response as seen in uterine adenomyosis . These are in fact the extra-uterine sites of adenomyoma described by Cullen .
As delineated above, the disease process starts focally in the depth of the basal endometrium. Thus, endometrial biopsies might miss the focus with an activated TIAR system. With the progression of the disease the area of alteration might be expanded. This is in keeping with the observation that the molecular markers associated with endometriosis could be more consistently demonstrated in more advanced stages of the disease .
With respect to the molecular biology of the eutopic endometrium in endometriosis it has to be taken into consideration that the endometrium is composed morphologically and functionally of at least two distinct layers, the basalis and the functionalis layers, respectively [21, 77–79]. This is not sufficiently taken into account when studies on molecular biology are performed with material taken from more or less random endometrial biopsies [39–41, 80]. The basal endometrium in women with endometriosis is twice as thick as in healthy women [21, 33]. Moreover, while in healthy women the endometrial–myometrial lining is smooth and regular it is irregular and sometimes polypoid in affected women [3, 81]. Thus, biopsies taken from women with endometriosis might to a variable and unknown extent, be ‘contaminated’ with basal endometrium. This might explain at least in part the finding of ‘progesterone resistance’ [40, 82, 83], and an impaired estradiol metabolism in the endometrium of women with endometriosis [41, 80]. Using immunohistochemistry of estradiol receptor alpha and progesterone receptor no progesterone resistance could be observed in the late secretory phase of the functional endometrium of affected women. As in healthy women, with the progression of the secretory phase, the ER and PR expression declined in the functionalis and steadily rose in the basalis as well as in the endometriotic lesions . The latter findings suggest physiological progesterone resistance in the basal endometrium and also in the endometriotic lesions as they are derived from implanted fragments of basal endometrium. Moreover, clinical studies with oocyte donation do not support a generally impeded implantation in women with endometriosis . With respect to the expression of the 17βHSD type 2 no data are available that distinguish between functionalis and basalis [83, 85].
Both, endometriosis and adenomyosis may now be integrated into the physiological mechanism and new nosological concept of “tissue injury and repair” (TIAR) and may, in this context, represent the extreme of a basically physiological, estrogen-related mechanism that is pathologically exaggerated in an extremely estrogen-sensitive, reproductive organ.
Circumstantial evidence suggests that endometriosis and adenomyosis are caused by trauma. In the spontaneously developing disease, chronic uterine peristaltic activity or phases of hyperperistalsis induce, at the endometrial–myometrial interface near the fundo-cornual raphe, microtraumatizations with the activation of the TIAR mechanism. This results in the local production of estrogen. With ongoing peristaltic activity, such sites might increase and the increasingly produced estrogens would interfere in a paracrine fashion with the ovarian control over uterine peristaltic activity, resulting in permanent hyperperistalsis and a self-perpetuation of the disease process. Overt auto-traumatization of the uterus with dislocation of fragments of the basal endometrium into the peritoneal cavity and infiltration of the basal endometrium into the depth of the myometrial wall ensues. In most cases of endometriosis/adenomyosis, a causal event early in the reproductive period of life must be postulated leading rapidly to uterine hyperperistalsis. In late premenopausal adenomyosis, such an event might not have occurred. However, as indicated by the high prevalence of the disease, it appears to be unavoidable that, with time, chronic normoperistalsis throughout the reproductive period of life leads to the same kind of microtraumatization. With the activation of the TIAR mechanism, followed by chronic inflammation  and infiltrative growth, endometriosis/adenomyosis of the younger woman and premenopausal adenomyosis share in principle the same pathophysiology. In conclusion, endometriosis and adenomyosis result from the exaggeration of the basically physiological mechanism of ‘tissue injury and repair’ (TIAR) involving local estrogen production. This is further magnified in an estrogen-sensitive environment normally controlled by the ovary.
Conflict of interest statement
No Conflict of interest statement was provided by the authors.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.