Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 280, Issue 4, pp 579–584

Patterns and success of fetal programming among women with low and extremely low pre-pregnancy BMI

  • Victoria Belogolovkin
  • Amina P. Alio
  • Alfred K. Mbah
  • Heather B. Clayton
  • Deanna Wathington
  • Hamisu M. Salihu
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-0965-8

Cite this article as:
Belogolovkin, V., Alio, A.P., Mbah, A.K. et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2009) 280: 579. doi:10.1007/s00404-009-0965-8

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the frequency of fetal programming phenotypes among women with low BMI and the success of these programming patterns-to determine if small for gestational age (SGA) is a biologically adaptive mechanism to improve chances for infant survival.

Methods

We examined the frequency of fetal programming phenotypes: SGA, large for gestational age (LGA), and adequate for gestational age (AGA) among 1,063,888 singleton live births from 1978 to 1997. We also estimated the success of fetal programming phenotypes using neonatal death as the primary study outcome.

Results

Underweight gravidas with AGA and LGA babies had elevated risk of neonatal mortality when compared to normal weight mothers, while the risk for neonatal mortality among mothers with SGA babies was reduced.

Conclusions

The variation in relative degrees of fetal programming patterns and success observed suggests that underweight mothers are more likely to succeed in programming SGA fetuses rather than any other phenotype.

Keywords

Low BMISGAFetal programmingNeonatal mortality

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria Belogolovkin
    • 1
  • Amina P. Alio
    • 3
  • Alfred K. Mbah
    • 4
  • Heather B. Clayton
    • 3
  • Deanna Wathington
    • 4
  • Hamisu M. Salihu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Community and Family HealthUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  4. 4.The Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and BabiesUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  5. 5.Center for Research and Evaluation, Lawton and Rhea Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and BabiesUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA