Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of preoperative rofecoxib in patients who underwent uterine curettage. Materials and methods: This double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial included 80 women who underwent uterine curettage. Forty women were randomly assigned to rofecoxib 50 mg and 40 women to the placebo. The main outcome measure was the intensity of pain measured by the visual analog scale and categorical pain scores during and after the procedure. Chi-squared, Fisher exact, Student t test, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The intensity of pain was not found to be different between groups over the course of procedure (P>0.05). There were no serious adverse effects in this study. Conclusion: The preoperative administration of rofecoxib was not effective in reducing pain in uterine curettage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bekker A, Cooper PR, Frempong-Boadu A, Babu R, Errico T, Lebovits A (2002) Evaluation of preoperative administration of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib for the treatment of postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery. Neurosurgery 50:1053–1057
Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, Shapiro D, Burgos-Vargas R, Davis B, Day R, Ferraz MB, Hawkey CJ, Hochberg MC, Kvien TK, Schnitzer TJ (2000) Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:1520–1528, 1522
Bresalier RS, Sandler RS, Quan H, Bolognese JA, Oxenius B, Horgan K, Lines C, Riddell R, Morton D, Lanas A, Konstam MA, Baron JA (2005) Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. N Engl J Med 352:1092–1102
Cetin A, Cetin M (1997) Effect of deep injections of local anesthetics and basal dilatation of cervix in management of pain during legal abortions. A randomized, controlled study. Contraception 56:85–87
Chanrachakul B, Likittanasombut P, O-Prasertsawat P, Herabutya Y (2001) Lidocaine versus plain saline for pain relief in fractional curettage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 98:592–595
Chapman CR, Syrjala KL (2001) Management of pain. In: Loeser JD (ed) Bonica’s management of pain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 310–328
Hawkey CJ (1999) COX-2 inhibitors. Lancet 353:307–314
Hawkey CJ (2001) COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 15:801–820
Horattas MC, Evans S, Sloan-Stakleff KD, Lee C, Snoke JW (2004) Does preoperative rofecoxib (Vioxx) decrease postoperative pain with laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 188:271–276
Ilkjaer S, Nielsen PA, Bach LF, Wernberg M, Dahl JB (2000) The effect of dextromethorphan, alone or in combination with ibuprofen, on postoperative pain after minor gynaecological surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44:873–877
Johnson N, Crompton AC, Ramsden SV (1989) The efficacy of paracervical injections of lignocaine before laser ablation of the cervical transformation zone. A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96:1410–1412
Karamanlioglu B, Turan A, Memis D, Ture M (2004) Preoperative oral rofecoxib reduces postoperative pain and tramadol consumption in patients after abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 98:1039–1043
MacKay HT, Schulz KF, Grimes DA (1985) Safety of local versus general anesthesia for second-trimester dilatation and evacuation abortion. Obstet Gynecol 66:661–665
Malmstrom K, Daniels S, Kotey P, Seidenberg BC, Desjardins PJ (1999) Comparison of rofecoxib and celecoxib, two cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, in postoperative dental pain: a randomized, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled clinical trial. Clin Ther 21:1653–1663
Matheson AJ, Figgitt DP (2001) Rofecoxib: a review of its use in the management of osteoarthritis, acute pain and rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs 61:833–865
Meyer R (2002) Rofecoxib reduces perioperative morphine consumption for abdominal hysterectomy and laparoscopic gastric banding. Anaesth Intensive Care 30:389–390
Miller L, Jensen MP, Stenchever MA (1996) A double-blind randomized comparison of lidocaine and saline for cervical anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol 87:600–604
Morrison BW, Christensen S, Yuan W, Brown J, Amlani S, Seidenberg B (1999) Analgesic efficacy of the cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitor rofecoxib in post-dental surgery pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Ther 21:943–953
Mukherjee D, Nissen SE, Topol EJ (2001) Risk of cardiovascular events associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors. JAMA 286:954–959
Peters AA, Witte EH, Damen AC, Holm JP, Drogendijk AC, vd Velde EA, Trimbos JB (1996) Pain relief during and following outpatient curettage and hysterosalpingography: a double blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of tramadol versus naproxen. Cobra Research Group. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 66:51–56
Reicin A, Brown J, Jove M, deAndrade JR, Bourne M, Krupa D, Walters D, Seidenberg B (2001) Efficacy of single-dose and multidose rofecoxib in the treatment of post-orthopedic surgery pain. Am J Orthop 30:40–48
Reuben SS, Bhopatkar S, Maciolek H, Joshi W, Sklar J (2002) The preemptive analgesic effect of rofecoxib after ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesth Analg 94:55–59
Reuben SS, Connelly NR (2000) Postoperative analgesic effects of celecoxib or rofecoxib after spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analg 91:1221–1225
Siddle NC, Young O, Sledmere CM, Reading AE, Whitehead MI (1983) A controlled trial of naproxen sodium for relief of pain associated with Vabra suction curettage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90:864–869
Suprapto K, Reed S (1984) Naproxen sodium for pain relief in first-trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150:1000–1001
Vane JR, Botting RM (1998) Mechanism of action of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med 104:2S–8S
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poomtavorn, Y., Phupong, V. Prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of preoperative rofecoxib for pain relief in uterine curettage. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273, 115–118 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0041-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0041-y