Biomechanical analysis of bicortical versus unicortical locked plating of mid-clavicular fractures
- Daniel HammanAffiliated withOrthopedic Physicians of Colorado Email author
- , Derek LindseyAffiliated withBone and Joint Center of Excellence, Palo Alto Veterans Administration
- , Jason DragooAffiliated withDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Operative fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures has been shown to improve the functional outcomes and decrease the likelihood of non-union; however, little is known about the need for locking screws versus traditional screws. We, therefore, evaluated the strength of unicortical locked plating versus traditional bicortical non-locking fixation methods.
Ten matched pairs of fresh, frozen cadaver clavicle specimens were obliquely osteotomized through the mid-shaft to represent the most common fracture pattern. After randomization, the clavicles were repaired using pre-contoured plates with either standard bicortical non-locking screws or unicortical locking screws. The constructs were then potted in cement and tested on a MTS machine using a custom gimble and evaluated for load to failure and axial and rotational stiffness.
There was no significant difference between the constructs in terms of axial stiffness (locking 688.3 ± 306.2 N/mm, non-locking 674.5 ± 613.0 N/mm; p = 0.77) or load to failure (locking 720.1 ± 232.0 N, non-locking 664.8 ± 167.5 N; p = 0.46). However, rotational stiffness varied significantly (locking 1.70 ± 0.91 N-m/mm, non-locking 2.49 ± 0.78 N-m/mm, p = 0.049) with bicortical non-locking constructs exhibiting higher torque values.
Unicortical fixation using pre-contoured plates and locking screws has a similar biomechanical profile compared to gold standard non-locked bicortical screws in cyclic axial compression and axial load to failure. Non-locking constructs were stiffer under rotational testing. This technique may provide a suitable biomechanical environment for bony healing. This may also improve the safety of clavicle plating by protecting infraclavicular structures from injury during drilling or screw penetration as it obviates the need for bicortical fixation.
KeywordsClavicle Biomechanics Fixation Locking plate Fracture Vascular injury Complications
- Biomechanical analysis of bicortical versus unicortical locked plating of mid-clavicular fractures
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volume 131, Issue 6 , pp 773-778
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Locking plate
- Vascular injury
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Orthopedic Physicians of Colorado, 799 E. Hampden Ave, #400, Englewood, CO, 80113, USA
- 2. Bone and Joint Center of Excellence, Palo Alto Veterans Administration, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Redwood City, CA, 94063-6342, USA