Retention of flexible intramedullary nails following treatment of pediatric femur fractures
Flexible intramedullary nails are commonly used for the treatment of diaphyseal femur fractures in children. Although, their removal after fracture healing is advocated by some, there are no definitive studies to support the routine removal of these implants. The purpose of this study is to determine the natural history of children with diaphyseal fractures of the femur treated with flexible intramedullary nails and no scheduled nail removal.
Material and methods
We performed a retrospective case series of 24 consecutive children treated at our tertiary pediatric referral center for closed diaphyseal femur fractures. All children had intramedullary fixation with flexible titanium nails. The main outcomes measured are fracture healing, incidence of hardware removal, and pain assessment with the use of a follow-up telephone questionnaire.
All the patients healed their fractures. The average follow-up time was 3.6 years. A total of six patients had removal of nails for any reason at an average of 15 months post-injury. The survivorship free of revision due to persistent pain was 72% at 5 years of follow-up. Twenty-two patients were reached by phone for a final follow-up questionnaire. There was no difference in reports of residual symptoms of pain among those who did have nails removed and those who did not (P = 0.626).
Among children with femur fractures treated with flexible intramedullary nailing without scheduled implant removal, about a quarter may ultimately require a second procedure for nail removal due to persistent discomfort. Moreover, up to half of patients can have residual non-debilitating pain at 2–5 years post-injury regardless of presence or absence of the implant. Whether this is a previously unrecognized adverse outcome of this injury or treatment approach, or due to routinely leaving nails in will have to be assessed in future controlled trials.
- Alzahrani AG, Behairy YM, Alhossan MH, Arab FS, Alammari AA (2003) Removal of internal fixation in pediatric patients. Saudi Med J 24(3):254–255
- Bostman OM (1996) Metallic or absorbable fracture fixation devices. A cost minimization analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:233–239 CrossRef
- Bostman O, Pihlajamaki H (1996) Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units. J Trauma 41(5):846–849 CrossRef
- Cramer KE, Tornetta P 3rd, Spero CR, Alter S, Miraliakbar H, Teefey J (2000) Ender rod fixation of femoral shaft fractures in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 376:119–123 CrossRef
- Flynn JM, Hresko T, Reynolds RA, Blasier RD, Davidson R, Kasser J (2001) Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: a multicenter study of early results with analysis of complications. J Pediatr Orthop 21(1):4–8
- Flynn JM, Luedtke L, Ganley TJ, Pill SG (2002) Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: lessons from the learning curve. Am J Orthop 31(2):71–74
- Flynn JM et al (2004) Comparison of titanium elastic nails with traction and a spica cast to treat femoral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(4):770–777
- Heinrich SD, Drvaric DM, Darr K, MacEwen GD (1994) The operative stabilization of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures with flexible intramedullary nails: a prospective analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 14(4):501–507
- Hinton RY, Lincoln A, Crockett MM, Sponseller P, Smith G (1999) Fractures of the femoral shaft in children. Incidence, mechanisms, and sociodemographic risk factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4):500–509
- Jago ER, Hindley CJ (1998) The removal of metalwork in children. Injury 29(6):439–441 CrossRef
- Kahle WK (1994) The case against routine metal removal. J Pediatr Orthop 14(2):229–237
- Kasser JR, Beaty JH (2001) Femoral shaft fractures. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR (eds) Rockwood, and Wilkins’ fractures in children. Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 948
- Ligier JN, Metaizeau JP, Prevot J, Lascombes P (1988) Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70(1):74–77
- Luhmann SJ, Schootman M, Schoenecker PL, Dobbs MB, Gordon JE (2003) Complications of titanium elastic nails for pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 23(4):443–447 CrossRef
- Sanders JO, Browne RH, Mooney JF, Raney EM, Horn BD, Anderson DJ Hennrikus WL, Robertson WW (2001) Treatment of femoral fractures in children by pediatric orthopedists: results of a 1998 survey. J Pediatr Orthop 21(4):436–441 CrossRef
- Schmalzried TP, Grogan TJ, Neumeier PA, Dorey FJ (1991) Metal removal in a pediatric population: benign procedure or necessary evil? J Pediatr Orthop 11(1):72–76
- Voggenreiter G, Leiting S, Brauer H, Leiting P, Majetschack M, Bardenheuer M, Obertacke U (2003) Immuno-inflammatory tissue reaction to stainless-steel and titanium plates used for internal fixation of long bones. Biomaterials 24:247–254 CrossRef
- Retention of flexible intramedullary nails following treatment of pediatric femur fractures
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volume 127, Issue 7 , pp 509-514
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Femur fracture
- Bone nail
- Treatment outcome
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MU-320W, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
- 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital and Research Center at Oakland, Oakland, USA