Expression of the progenitor marker NG2/CSPG4 predicts poor survival and resistance to ionising radiation in glioblastoma
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Svendsen, A., Verhoeff, J.J.C., Immervoll, H. et al. Acta Neuropathol (2011) 122: 495. doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0867-2
- 1k Downloads
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumour, where patients respond poorly to radiotherapy and exhibit dismal survival outcomes. The mechanisms of radioresistance are not completely understood. However, cancer cells with an immature stem-like phenotype are hypothesised to play a role in radioresistance. Since the progenitor marker neuron-glial-2 (NG2) has been shown to regulate several aspects of GBM progression in experimental systems, we hypothesised that its expression would influence the survival of GBM patients. Quantification of NG2 expression in 74 GBM biopsies from newly diagnosed and untreated patients revealed that 50% express high NG2 levels on tumour cells and associated vessels, being associated with significantly shorter survival. This effect was independent of age at diagnosis, treatment received and hypermethylation of the O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) DNA repair gene promoter. NG2 was frequently co-expressed with nestin and vimentin but rarely with CD133 and the NG2 positive tumour cells harboured genetic aberrations typical for GBM. 2D proteomics of 11 randomly selected biopsies revealed upregulation of an antioxidant, peroxiredoxin-1 (PRDX-1), in the shortest surviving patients. Expression of PRDX-1 was associated with significantly reduced products of oxidative stress. Furthermore, NG2 expressing GBM cells showed resistance to ionising radiation (IR), rapidly recognised DNA damage and effectuated cell cycle checkpoint signalling. PRDX-1 knockdown transiently slowed tumour growth rates and sensitised them to IR in vivo. Our data establish NG2 as an important prognostic factor for GBM patient survival, by mediating resistance to radiotherapy through induction of ROS scavenging enzymes and preferential DNA damage signalling.
KeywordsRadiation resistanceNG2CD133, DNA damagePeroxiredoxin-1Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and malignant primary brain tumour in adults . Although combined radiation and chemotherapy is currently the most effective treatment modality, the patients have a median survival of only 14.6 months , due to the tumour’s intrinsic resistance to radio- and chemotherapy. Molecular markers that effectively predict response to therapy and survival outcomes are limited. Young age at diagnosis and promoter methylation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) are established predictors of favourable response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy [18, 34]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced in response to ionising radiation (IR), and mediate its mutagenic and cytotoxic effects. Elevated ROS, in excess of antioxidant enzyme expression, damages DNA, lipids and proteins, ultimately causing tumour cell death . Peroxiredoxins (PRDX) are a large, highly conserved thioredoxin-specific antioxidant family classified by the presence of one or two cysteine residues (1-Cys) and (2-Cys), respectively . PRDX-1 is a major 2-Cys family member whose antioxidant activity modulates responses to IR.
The neural progenitor marker Neuron Glia-2 (NG2), is a 300 kDa transmembrane chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan encoded by the cspg4 gene on chromosome 15 . The human homologue is the melanoma proteoglycan (MPG) and is aberrantly expressed by several tumour types [2, 8, 25, 28, 43, 44] where it correlates with poor clinical outcome [4, 45]. We have previously demonstrated that NG2 promoted GBM multi-drug chemoresistance mediated by augmented integrin activated PI3K/AKT survival signalling. . We showed also that NG2 promotes tumour growth and angiogenesis in animal models [9, 51]. Given its multifunctional role in GBM biology, we hypothesised that increased proportions of NG2 expressing cells in a GBM may have an impact on patient survival outcomes. Furthermore, some studies have linked therapy resistance to another subpopulation of GBM cells characterised by expression of the neural stem cell marker, CD133/prominin . We therefore investigated the expression patterns of CD133, nestin and vimentin expressing neural stem/progenitor cells and asked whether the NG2 positive tumour cells co-expressed these molecular markers. We demonstrate herein that high NG2 expression on tumour cells and angiogenic vasculature in GBM is associated with shorter survival, independent of patients’ age, treatment, and MGMT promoter hypermethylation status. NG2 expressing GBM cells harbour genetic aberrations that are typical for the disease, co-express nestin and vimentin but are rarely CD133 positive. At a mechanistic level, we demonstrate that NG2 positive GBM cells with increased PRDX-1 activity show resistance to radiotherapy by rapidly inducing a DNA damage signalling response. Moreover, this response could be counteracted by NG2 and PRDX-1 knockdown in the NG2 expressing cells but not in control NG2 negative cells. Our data establish NG2 as a prognostic factor for poor survival and resistance to IR in GBM and as such may be an amenable therapeutic target. Our findings further contribute to a body of evidence demonstrating that aggressive growth and therapy resistance may not be restricted to a discrete population of tumour cells. Cellular and molecular heterogeneity in GBMs drive these biological features through multiple mechanisms.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and shRNA transduction
The NG2 negative GBM cell line U251N (U251, American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MA, USA; ATCC) was transfected with NG2 cDNA to produce the U251-NG2 cell line as previously described . HF66 (Ford Cancer Center, Detroit, MI, USA) GBM cell line that endogenously expressed NG2 was propagated as previously described . Due to increasing reports of misidentified cell lines, we verified the identities of all our cell lines by STR analysis, and confirmed these to be bonafide (data not shown).
Retroviral PRDX-1 and irrelevant GFP control shRNA constructs were purchased from Origene (Rockville, MD), and used to generate the stable U251-NG2 shPRDX-1 and U251-NG2-shCTRL cell lines as well control U251 shPRDX-1 and U251 shCTRL cell lines. Stable cell lines were generated by puromycin selection, according to the manufacturer’s protocols. To validate our findings in another cell line, the high endogenous NG2 expressing HF66 cells were transduced with lentiviral particles harbouring shRNAs targeting the cspg4 gene or control scrambled shRNAs according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Briefly, cells were infected at a MOI of 1–2 in the presence of 10 μg/ml Polybrene® (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Stable clones expressing the shRNA constructs were established by 2 μg/ml puromycin selection, and immunoblotting analyses validated knockdowns.
Ninety-six human GBM biopsies were obtained during surgical resections performed at the Haukeland University Hospital, Norway, between 1998 and 2008, and the University Hospital in Düsseldorf, Germany, from 1988 to 2004. In an additional study of GBM stem cell phenotyping, seven GBM biopsies from surgical resections performed in 2010 at Haukeland University Hospital were included. The patients gave their written informed consent and the study was approved by the respective ethical boards in Norway and Germany. Parts of the tumour were snap frozen while other parts were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE). H&E-stained sections were prepared to define representative tumour regions as previously described  and GBM diagnosis was confirmed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification  by pathologists (H.I and J.F). Eligibility criteria included availability of follow-up data, less than 50% necrosis in the sample, and only biopsies obtained at primary diagnosis were included. Clinical information was obtained by reviewing the medical records, and death certificates/registers. Patients were followed-up from the date of operation until death or May 2009. At this point only one patient with a NG2 negative tumour was alive. All patients were treated by surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy and survival determined as the time elapsed from the date of surgery to the date of death.
FFPE tissue was subjected to immunohistochemistry using the avidin–biotin-peroxidase complex method according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Vectastain, Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). NG2 staining was performed as previously described . The expression was graded blindly by two independent investigators including a pathologist (H.I) as negative (0); slight (+); moderate (++) or high (+++) on tumour cells, or on vessels based on overall staining intensity and area fraction of positive cells (Table 2). However, due to small groups, 0/+ and ++/+++ were combined (Table 3).
Morphometric quantification of NG2 expression in patient GBM biopsy material
NG2 expression was also quantified using the NIS-ElementsTM BR 3.1 software (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), 200× magnification (Supplementary Figure ESM 1). The threshold for pixel intensity was determined on the basis of four brain tumour sections stained for NG2, using a Nikon Eclipse 600 microscope (Nikon). This threshold was stored and subsequently applied with identical microscope settings for scoring of all tumour sections, including negative controls stained for MOC31 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.). Immunopositive elements (pixels above threshold) were measured and expressed as area fraction of the visual field for each tumour section. The NG2 low GBM biopsies had an immunopositive fraction of 5% or less, compared to NG2 high biopsies that had correspondingly 15% or more. The difference in immunopositive fraction was statistically significant (T test, p = 0.0027).
Array comparative genomic hybridization
Comparative genomic hybridization was used to determine the gene copy number in high and low NG2 expressing GBMs (n = 5), using whole-genome arrays of 2,400 chromosomally mapped BAC clones (Hum.Array1.14) as previously described .
Simultaneous immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
FFPE patient GBM biopsies were incubated at 58°C o/n, de-paraffinised and rehydrated using the standard procedures. Antigen retrieval was performed in target retrieval solution, pH 9 (DAKO Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). The slides were dehydrated and washed in 2× SSC (150 mM NaCl, 15 mM Sodium Citrate, pH7), and denatured in the presence of 10 μl Vysis LSI EGFR Spectrum Orange/CEP7 Spectrum Green probe (Abbott Molecular, Abbott Park, IL, USA) at 75°C for 5 min. The slides were hybridized at 37°C for 36 h in a humidified hybridisation chamber, followed by incubation with anti-NG2 (WB Stallcup, Burnham Institute) o/n at 4°C and AlexaFluor 647-labelled 2°Ab (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The slides were mounted with DAPI Vectashield, (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA) and analysed on a Zeiss LSM 510Meta Confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Thornwood, NY, USA).
Bisulfite treatment and MGMT methylation analysis
For the analysis of MGMT promoter methylation, DNA was extracted from snap-frozen tumour tissue using proteinase K digestion and phenol/chloroform extraction whereas for FFPE samples, the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used. Bisulfite conversion was conducted as previously described . Each tumour and control sample (bisulfite treated DNA from normal brain as negative control, and SssI treated genomic DNA as positive control) was analysed using the same bisulfite preparation as template.
The first dimension of separation was carried out on IPGphore (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) at 20°C. The protein concentration was adjusted to 600 μg in a sample buffer consisting of 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 100 mM DTT, and 1% v/v pharmalyte (Amersham Biosciences) pI 3-10, and applied to 18-cm (pH 3–10) linear immobilized pH gradient (IPG) Immobiline DryStrip (Amersham Biosciences) by in-sample rehydration. The strips were applied onto 13.75% v/v acrylamide/N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad, Hempstead, UK). The gels were stained with SYPRO Ruby (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, scanned on the Typhoon laser scanner (Amersham GE Healthcare, Fairfield, CT, USA) and spot analysis was performed on PDQuest software version 8.0 (Bio-Rad).
Protein digestion and mass spectrometry analysis
Differentially expressed protein spots digested in porcine trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the peptides mixed with a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Mass spectra were generated on an Ultraflex MS/MS (Bruker Daltonics). Data analysis was performed using MASCOT 2.0 software (Matrix science, Boston, MA), the Swiss-Prot and NCB database search. Protein identification was based on peptide mass fingerprinting, percent coverage, Mowse score, number of peptide matches, peak intensity, and match of pI and molecular weight with the location of the protein on the 2D gel .
Flow cytometric analysis of GBM stem cell phenotype
Seven GBM biopsies from newly diagnosed, untreated patients were dissociated into single cell suspensions with papain at 37°C using the Neuronal Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. GBM biopsies were stained with the following purified mouse and rat anti-human monoclonal antibodies (mAb): anti-CD45-V450, HI30 (BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium); anti-Vimentin-FITC, V9 (eBioscience, Vienna, Austria); anti-NG2, 9.2.27 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.); anti-Nestin-PerCP-Cy5.5, 25/Nestin (BD Bioscience); anti-CD31-PE-Cy7, WM59, (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA); anti-CD133/1-APC, AC133 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Appropriate isotype controls (ImmunoTools, Friesoythe, Germany) were used in all experiments to determine the level of background staining. The NCH421k GBM cells that are enriched for CD133  were used as positive controls (courtesy of Dr Herold-Mende, Dept Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg). The anti-NG2 mAb was coupled with Zenon R-PE mouse IgG2a labelling kit, following the supplier’s recommendations (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). Dead cells were excluded by LIVE/DEAD fixable near-infra red dead cells staining (Invitrogen). After 30-min incubation at 4°C, the GBM cell suspensions were washed twice in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Invitrogen) supplemented with 0.5% BSA and then incubated for an additional 15 min at 4°C and in the dark with Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences) in order to permeabilise the cells. The intracellular staining using anti-Vimentin and anti-Nestin was performed for 30 min at 4°C in PermWash solution (BD Biosciences). After two washes in PermWash solution, cells were suspended in PBS supplemented with 0.5% BSA and stained with Hoechst solution at 0.1 μg/ml in order to discriminate nuclear cells from debris. The samples were run on a FACSAria™ flow cytometer and analysed with FACSDiva™ software (BD Biosciences). Diagrams were then created using FlowJo flow software version 7.2.5 (Tree Star Inc, Ashland, OR, USA).
Lipid peroxidation assay
The level of thiobarbituric reactive substances (TBARS) was assessed in butanol-extracts of tissue homogenates (10% w/v prepared from frozen samples), according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Northwest Life Science Specialties, LCC, Vancouver). The 3rd-derivative absorbance spectra (400–700 nm) were obtained, and malondialdehyde levels were calculated based on the peak value at 510 nm.
Viability and clonogenic assays
Prior to irradiation cells in exponential growth were seeded in conditioned medium in 6-well plates at a density of 300 cells/well. Colonies were stained in 6% glutaraldehyde/0.5% Crystal violet and counted 11 days post-irradiation. Surviving fractions were calculated as previously described . The 3-(4,5dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium salt (MTS) assay was used in viability assays after 120 h as described by the manufacturer (CellTiter96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Cells in exponential growth phase were seeded at 5,000 cells/ml in 96-well plates after exposure to ionising radiation from 2, 5 10, and 20 Gy.
Flow cytometric assessment of cell cycle kinetics
G1-phase checkpoint was analysed by simultaneous measurement of DNA content and bromo-deoxy uridine (BrdU) uptake. After 5 Gy irradiation, the cells were incubated at 37°C for 2 h and pulse-labelled with 10 μM BrdU (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA) for 20 min. The cells were fixed and propagated for staining with FITC-labelled anti-BrdU antibody, according to the manufacturers protocol (BD Pharmingen). 7-AAD counterstain was used to visualise DNA content. For G2 checkpoint analyses, irradiated cells were incubated at 37°C for 16 h, harvested and fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde. Cells were immunostained for phosphorylated Histone H3 Ser10 (Cell Signalling, Boston, MA, USA) and nuclei counterstained with propidium iodide according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Flow cytometry was performed on Accuri C6, and bivariate data analysed by FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).
Immunoblotting was performed using NuPage gel systems (Invitrogen), lysates were prepared according to the Kinexus protocol (http://www.kinexus.ca) 15 min post-irradiation. Western blotting for PRDX-1 from mice brains was performed on homogenates from the right (site of tumour implantation) and the left hemisphere (normal brain). The band intensity of PRDX-1 in the tumour was quantified using densitometry, and expressed as fold change from the normal brain, normalised for β-actin. Antibodies used: Phospho-ATM (Ser1981); ATM (D2E2); Phospho-Chk2 (Thr68); Chk2; phospho-ASK (Thr845); ASK; pH2AX (Cell Signalling), PRDX-1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); NG2 (WB Stallcup, Burnham Institute); β-actin (Abcam).
Surgical procedures and ionising radiation
In vitro ionising radiation was given as 2, 5, 10 and 20 Gy doses at a rate of 3.1 Gy/min with a Clinac 600C/D linear accelerator irradiator (Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Fifty-four, 4 to 6-week old athymic Nude-nu female mice (Harlan, Horst, The Netherlands) were xenografted intracranially with 5 × 105/3 μl PBS U251, U251-NG2 ctrl shRNA or U251-NG2 PRDX-1shRNA cells. Three weeks prior to the cell implantation, a hollow guide-screw was implanted right fronto-lateral in the skull, through which cell suspensions were injected 2 mm below the screw, see Fig. 6a. At the onset of irradiation, starting 14 days post-implantation, a 0.2 mCi iodine-125 (125I) seed (IBt, Seneffe, Belgium) was inserted though the hollow screw as described previously . After 26 days mice were sacrificed to enable tumour analysis.
Patient survival was analysed using the Kaplan–Meier and the log rank test with Stata 11.0 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Cox regression was used to adjust for age as a categorical variable, below 60, between 60 and 70, and 75 years and above. A probability ≤0.05 was considered significant. The two-tailed Student’s t test, one way- or two way-analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square analyses were performed using Graphpad Prism 5.0 (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
High NG2 expression associates with poorer survival in GBM patients
Chromosomal gains and losses involving genes important for GBM progression in newly diagnosed and untreated patients
12q, 15p, 21
9p, 10, 13, 18q
7 (gain and amp)
7 (gain), 12 (amp)
EGFR, MDM2, Gli1
6q, 9p, 10, 14
7 (gain and amp)
NG2 expression on tumour and vessel
NG2 expression on tumour and vessel combining groups 0/+ and ++/+++
NG2 expressing cells are phenotypically distinct from CD133 positive tumour cells
Expression of NG2 Nestin and CD133 on tumour cells in patient GBM biopsies
(%) NG2+ Nestin+
(%) NG2+ Nestin+ Vimentin+
(%) NG2+ Nestin+ CD133+
(%) NG2+ Nestin+ CD133−
(%) CD31− CD45− CD133+
PRDX-1 is highly expressed in GBMs from the patients with shortest survival
NG2 expressing cells are more resistant to IR and preferentially induce DNA damage response by efficient activation of G1 and G2 checkpoint
NG2 mediates G2 checkpoint activation in response to radiation
To determine whether augmented PRDX-1 induction and checkpoint signalling was an NG2 specific response, we knocked down PRDX-1 in the parental U251 cells that do not express NG2 (Supplementary Figure ESM 3a). There was no significant difference in radiation responses in U251 wt, U251 ctrl shRNA or U251-PRDX-1 shRNA-treated cells (Supplementary Figure ESM 3b, Two-way ANOVA, p = 0.6). Although PRDX-1 was expressed in parental U251 wt and U251 ctrl shRNA cells but not in U251-PRDX-1 shRNAs after IR, there were no differential responses in the DNA damage and checkpoint signalling in these cells (Supplementary Figure ESM 3c). However compared to NG2 expressing U251-NG2 cells (Fig. 4), these controls exhibited attenuated H2AX and Chk2 activation after IR (Supplementary Figure ESM 3c). Correspondingly, the G1 checkpoint arrest in these control cells after 5 Gy IR was markedly smaller (Supplementary Figure ESM 3d) compared to U251-NG2 cells, and likewise, diminished G2 checkpoint activation (Supplementary Figure ESM 4). These findings indicate a causal link for NG2 in PRDX-1 induction and augmented DNA damage signalling leading to radiation resistance.
To investigate the mechanisms by which PRDX-1 might confer radioprotection, we examined activated apoptosis signalling kinase (ASK1) levels following IR. ASK1 is kept inactive by intramolecular complex with thioredoxins, and ROS oxidise thioredoxin and release it from ASK1. Phosphorylation of ASK1 is cognate for cell death by apoptosis . Phospho-ASK1 levels were elevated in the radiosensitive U251 and U251-PRDX-1 shRNA cells in a radiation dose-dependent manner, whereas phospho-ASK1 levels were unaltered in the radioresistant U251-NG2 cells (Fig. 4c), suggesting that the radioprotective effect of PRDX-1 is mediated by blocking phosphorylation of ASK1.
Suppression of PRDX-1 expression abrogates radiation resistance in vitro but is not sufficient for sustained tumour growth inhibition in vivo
The present study demonstrates that increased expression of the progenitor marker NG2 on tumour cells and vasculature in GBM biopsies was associated with shorter patient survival, independent of age, clinical treatment and MGMT promoter hypermethylation status. NG2 was highly expressed on the surface of tumour cells, including the most pleomorphic cells. However, both NG2 positive and negative tumours exhibited gross chromosomal aberrations that are typical for GBM. Approximately 19% of the GBM cases highly expressed NG2 only on the tumour vasculature, and predominantly on the glomerular-like microvascular proliferations. We have previously demonstrated that overexpression of NG2 in NG2 negative tumour cells produced highly angiogenic tumours characterised by highly tortuous and leaky vasculature [5, 9]. We further demonstrated recently that perturbation of NG2 function with shRNAs abrogated angiogenesis and normalised the tumour vasculature both structurally and functionally in patient GBM-based xenografts , indicating a causal role for NG2 in the formation of abnormal tumour vessels. Florid microvascular proliferations are poorly perfused and leaky, due to frequent thrombosis, lack of patent lumen and reduced blood brain barrier integrity. As a consequence, they are commonly located in the vicinity of necrosis where they are thought to contribute to the genesis of the ischemia . Hypoxia promoting microvascular proliferations contribute to radioresistance by reducing the oxygen enhancement effect of IR, inducing gene expression for cell cycle delay and stress proteins, and/or by increased genetic and cellular heterogeneity . The association of high NG2 expression on microvascular proliferations with 60% increased risk of patient mortality and the implications for radioresistance are limited by the retrospective neuropathological nature of the analysis that does not establish causality. We thus investigated the effect of IR in the angiogenic, NG2 expressing tumours in vivo, enabling us to mitigate these retrospective limitations. We were intrigued to note that the NG2 expressing tumours were still more resistant to IR compared to the less angiogenic, U251 tumours, that were completely eliminated in vivo. These findings implicate NG2 as an important factor predicting response to IR rather than differential hypoxic tumour microenvironments. The proportion of cycling U251-NG2 cells was reduced immediately post irradiation, and concomitantly, checkpoint point and DNA damage sensor proteins were activated. Subsequently, a larger fraction of the NG2 positive cells survived irradiation in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, these findings suggest that due to their high metabolic rates, these cells may have evolved a mechanism for surviving DNA damage based on rapid damage detection and checkpoint activation, facilitating repair or availability of survival factors.
The majority of the tumours highly expressed NG2 on both tumour cells and angiogenic vasculature, which is consistent with the high concordance of poor survival outcomes based on tumour or vascular NG2 expression, indicating that multiple mechanisms impacted on the patients’ survival outcomes. Indeed, high NG2 expression on both tumour cells and microvascular proliferations increased the risk of death by 155%. These findings have significant clinical implications as NG2 identifies 50% of GBM patients who respond poorly despite optimal treatment. In addition, our data demonstrate that high NG2 expression may override the impact of otherwise favourable prognostic factors such as young age and MGMT hypermethylation status. Stratification for age and MGMT promoter methylation is mandatory in EORTC clinical trials for GBM, thus we suggest that NG2 may be an additional eligibility factor for identifying the potentially poor responders.
NG2 is an established marker for progenitor cells in various tissues , and we have previously shown that it was greatly expressed in GBMs and oligodendrogliomas compared to low-grade tumours [8, 11]. So far it had not been established whether the NG2 positive tumour cells in GBMs represent an immature phenotype. We demonstrated herein that the vast majority of NG2+ tumour cells co-expressed nestin and vimentin, and that this subpopulation rarely expressed CD133, indicating a possible mesenchymal differentiation phenotype . These findings are supported by cDNA microarray data of the GBM molecular class datasets , where searches revealed that the greatest intensity of NG2 gene (cspg4) expression was in the GBM with necrosis where 13/50 (26%) exhibited intensity values equal to or greater than 500 . They all fell under the proliferative/mesenchymal subclass with a predominance of genes related to proliferation, wound healing and angiogenesis. This subclass was demonstrated to be associated with poor patient survival [7, 37]. Indeed only 1/6 of the GBMs belonging to the proneural classification (GBM without necrosis) had cspg4 intensity greater than 500. So, the association of NG2 with poor survival is partially validated by independent datasets and adds to the link between immature cells and GBM aggressiveness [1, 37]. On the other hand, a body of evidence is emerging demonstrating that GBM cells expressing various differentiation markers, irrespective of the stem cell phenotype, may as readily contribute to the aggressive growth of this disease [13, 38]. Loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 10 and gain of chromosome 7 have been linked to the mesenchymal GBM phenotype. Although limited, our array CGH data showed a possible trend in favour of greater frequency or amplitude of relative copy number changes on chromosomes 7 and 10 in the high NG2 expressing tumours. Combined with the flow cytometric data demonstrating high vimentin expression in this subpopulation, this trend is in keeping with the finding of high NG2 expression among the previously reported poor prognosis proliferative and mesenchymal tumour subtypes . It is thus also possible that the prognostic value of NG2 might be partially based on its ability to distinguish molecular tumour subtypes. Further work is required to explore these initial observations. Our data emphasise the complexity of this cancer and the need for individualised therapy based on the tumours genetic and phenotypic composition. We hypothesise that NG2 could be an attractive target in tailored GBM treatment because it is expressed on both the sprouting tumour vasculature and treatment resistant tumour cells.
Upregulation of peroxiredoxin antioxidants has been reported in various solid tumours [23, 32, 35], and is proposed to protect cancer cells from oxidative damage, induced by excessive metabolic activity and anti-cancer treatments. PRDX-1 belongs to the same gene family as PRDX-II, whose expression was induced by IR and chemotherapy [14, 36, 48]. We previously demonstrated that highly aggressive NG2 expressing cell lines and patient GBM spheroids were more resistant to chemotherapy mediated by increased integrin/PI3K/AKT survival signalling . Since these GBM patients also expressed high levels of PRDX-1, our study supports a role for augmented survival signalling that rescues the tumours from lethal DNA damage. Antioxidants inhibit the formation of peroxy radicals and interfere with the subsequent formation of cyclic endo-peroxides to malondialdehyde . Our finding of low MDA levels in high PRDX-1 expressing tumours is consistent with this. Previous work demonstrated that shRNA knockdown of PRDX-II sensitised tumour cells to radiation in vitro due to decreased glutathione reductase activity . Unlike the previous studies examining effects of PRDX-1 depletion on IR response in ectopic tumours [12, 52], we observed only moderate sensitisation to IR by PRDX-1 knockdown in our orthotopic irradiation model. PRDX family members with high functional homology, such as PRDX-II may contribute to scavenge surplus peroxides in the absence of PRDX-1. Moreover, other cell types, such as macrophages are known to produce peroxiredoxins . Thus an alternative approach might have been to knockdown PRDX-1 directly in vivo in all the cell types expressing it. Nevertheless, our patient data extend previous proteomic studies that demonstrated that PRDX-1 was more abundantly expressed in GBMs compared to low grade gliomas , and that it predicts the recurrence and shorter survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients . These findings support a role for PRDX-1 in cancer progression, although its role in GBM radiation response in vivo requires further investigation since we found no association between PRDX-1 expression and patient survival outcomes. Furthermore, analysis of peroxiredoxin gene expression plots on REMBRANDT database revealed no obvious correlation with glioma grade of malignancy since both non-tumour samples as well as various histological types expressed it. Taken together, these findings might be due to functional redundancy in the large PRDX-1 family of antioxidants.
Since stem/progenitor cells can survive cycling hypoxic conditions that produce high levels of ROS (for example the NG2 positive cells), cancer cells that share some of their features may equally survive these hostile conditions by upregulating ROS scavengers such as PRDX-1 . We propose therefore a model (Supplementary Figure ESM 5) where ROS dissociates thioredoxin (PRDX-1) from ASK1, and the latter is phosphorylated and mediates apoptosis via downstream targets such as c-jun and P38 MAPKK . In NG2 expressing tumours capable of producing excess PRDX-1, the latter will be readily complexed with ASK1 preventing its activation and subsequent apoptosis. Instead, NG2 expressing cells rapidly activate DNA checkpoints, and survive DNA damage by upregulating the survival factors such as PRDX-1 and PI3K/Akt .
In conclusion, high NG2 expression is an important prognostic factor for GBM patient survival independent of age at diagnosis, clinical treatment and MGMT promoter hypermethylation. Multiple mechanisms may be involved, including radiation resistance, partially through mechanisms involving the antioxidant defence systems as well as molecular aberrations at the genetic level. NG2 may be an amenable therapeutic target worth exploring for GBM patients.
We are grateful to the patients that consented to the use of their biopsy tissue for this research. This work was supported by The Norwegian Cancer Society (PK01-2008-0093), The Meltzer Fond, The Norwegian research Council FRIFORSK, The Bergen Medical Research Foundation, The National Genome Research Network NGFN, Brain Tumour Net (grant 01GS08187, SP8), The German Ministry for Education and Research BMBF. We thank Professor Anders Molven for STR analyses, Professor WB Stallcup and Dr L.J. Stalpers for their generosity with reagents and constructs. We thank Dr Niclou (Norlux laboratory, CRP Sante, Luxembourg) for providing us NCH421k cells used as positive controls for CD133 expression (courtesy of Dr Herold-Mende, Dept Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg). We are very grateful to Bodil B. Hansen, Tove Johannsen, Solrun Steine, Christine Eriksen, Ingrid Strand for technical assistance and Arwed Weigel at the Molecular Imaging Center (MIC) for assistance with confocal microscopy. Proteomic and cell cycle flow cytometric analyses were performed at PROBE and MIC, respectively, University of Bergen, supported by the National Program for Research in Functional Genomics (FUGE), funded by the Norwegian Research council. Flow cytometric GBM stem cell phenotyping was conducted at Centre de Recherche de Public de la Santé, Luxembourg.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.