Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis and preparation of nanoparticles composed of amphiphilic poly(γ-glutamic acid) with different hydrophobic side chains and their potential of membrane disruptive activity

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Colloid and Polymer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the development of nanoparticle-based vaccine adjuvants, the interaction between nanoparticles (NPs) and the cells is a key factor. To control them, we focused on the relationship between the hydrophobicity of the side chains and the cell membrane. In this study, amphiphilic poly(γ-glutamic acid) (γ-PGA), using various types of hydrophobic side chains, was synthesized and used to prepare NPs for evaluating the membrane disruptive activity. When leucine ethyl ester (Leu), methionine ethyl ester (Met), or tryptophan ethyl ester (Trp) was grafted, each polymer formed monodispersed NPs at physiological conditions. Significantly, NPs composed of Leu and Trp showed a membrane disruptive activity at the endosomal environment (pH 5–6.5), while NPs composed of Met did not show. This might be due to the weak hydrophobicity of Met compared to that of Leu and Trp, which demonstrated that the interaction between NPs and cells could be controlled by designing the polymer compositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peek LJ, Middaugh CR, Berkland C (2008) Nanotechnology in vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:915–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Foged C, Sundblad A, Hovgaard L (2002) Targeting vaccines to dendritic cells. Pharm Res 19:229–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanchan V, Panda AK (2007) Interactions of antigen-loaded polylactide particles with macrophages and their correlation with the immune response. Biomaterials 28:5344–5357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Neefjes J, Jongsma MLM, Paul P, Bakke O (2011) Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation. Nat Rev Immunol 11:823–836

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison SC (2008) Viral membrane fusion. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:690–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Plank C, Oberhauser B, Mechtler K, Koch C, Wagner E (1994) The influence of endosome-disruptive peptides on gene transfer using synthetic virus-like gene transfer systems. J Biol Chem 269:12918–12924

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohmori N, Niidome T, Kiyota T, Lee S, Sugihara G, Wada A, Hirayama T, Aoyagi H (1998) Importance of hydrophobic region in amphiphilic structures of α-helical peptides for their gene transfer-ability into cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 245:259–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li W, Nicol F, Szoka FC Jr (2004) GALA: a designed synthetic pH-responsive amphipathic peptide with applications in drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:967–985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kreuter J, Liehl E, Berg U, Soliva M, Speiser PP (1988) Influence of hydrophobicity on the adjuvant effect of particulate polymeric adjuvants. Vaccine 6:253–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Seong SY, Matzinger P (2004) Hydrophobicity: an ancient damage-associated molecular pattern that initiate immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 4:469–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiu YL, Ho YC, Chen YM, Peng SF, Ke CJ, Chen KJ, Mi FL, Sung HW (2010) The characteristics, cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of nanoparticles made of hydrophobically-modified chitosan. J Control Release 146:152–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moyano DF, Goldsmith M, Solfiell DJ, Milo DL, Miranda OR, Peer D, Rotello VM (2012) Nanoparticle hydrophobicity dictates immune response. J Am Chem Soc 134:3965–3967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murthy N, Robichaud JR, Tirrell DA, Stayton PS, Hoffman AS (1999) The design and synthesis of polymers for eukaryotic membrane disruption. J Control Release 61:137–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones RA, Cheung CY, Black FE, Zia JK, Stayton PS, Hoffman AS, Wilson MR (2003) Poly(2-alkylacrylic acid) polymers deliver molecules to the cytosol by pH-sensitive disruption of endosomal vesicles. Biochem J 372:65–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsusaki M, Hiwatari K, Higashi M, Kaneko T, Akashi M (2004) Stably-dispersed and surface-functional bionanoparticles prepared by self-assembling amphipathic polymers of hydrophilic poly(γ-glutamic acid) bearing hydrophobic amino acids. Chem Lett 33:398–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Uto T, Akagi T, Toyama M, Nishi Y, Shima F, Akashi M, Baba M (2011) Comparative activity of biodegradable nanoparticles with aluminum adjuvants: antigen uptake by dendritic cells and induction of immune response in mice. Immunol Lett 140:36–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Akagi T, Kim H, Akashi M (2010) pH-dependent disruption of erythrocyte membrane by amphiphilic poly(amino acid) nanoparticles. J Biomater Sci 21:315–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Akagi T, Shima F, Akashi M (2011) Intracellular degradation and distribution of protein-encapsulated amphiphilic poly(amino acid) nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32:4959–4967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shima F, Akagi T, Uto T, Akashi M (2013) Manipulating the antigen-specific immune response by the hydrophobicity of amphiphilic poly(γ-glutamic acid) nanoparticles. Biomaterials 34:9709–9716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kyte J, Doolittle RF (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157:105–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Csizmadia F, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A, Panderi I, Darvas F (1997) Prediction of distribution coefficient from structure. 1. Estimation method. J Pharm Sci 86:865–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim H, Akagi T, Akashi M (2009) Preparation of size tunable amphiphilic poly(amino acid) nanoparticles. Macromol Biosci 9:842–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Duval-Terrié C, Huguet J, Muller G (2003) Self-assembly and hydrophobic clusters of amphiphilic polysaccharides. Colloids Surf A 220:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shima F, Uto T, Akagi T, Baba M, Akashi M (2013) Size effect of amphiphilic poly(γ-glutamic acid) nanoparticles on cellular uptake and maturation of dendritic cells in vivo. Acta Biomater 9:8894–8901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Obst M, Steinbüchel A (2004) Microbial degradation of poly(amino acid)s. Biomacromolecules 5:1166–1176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Duvall CL, Convertine AJ, Benoit DSW, Hoffman AS, Stayton PS (2010) Intracellular delivery of a proapoptotic peptide via conjugation to a RAFT synthesized endosomolytic polymer. Mol Pharm 7:468–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flanary S, Hoffman AS, Stayton PS (2009) Antigen delivery with poly(propylacrylic acid) conjugation enhances MHC-1 presentation and T-cell activation. Bioconjugate Chem 20:241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gessner A, Waicz R, Lieske A, Paulke B, Mäder K, Mülluer RH (2000) Nanoparticles with decreasing surface hydrophobicities: influence on plasma protein adsorption. Int J Pharm 196:245–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hou X, Liu B, Deng X, Zhang B, Yan J (2007) Monodisperse polystyrene microparticles by dispersion copolymerization of styrene and other vinyl comonomers: characterization and protein adsorption properties. J Biomed Mater Res A 83:280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yassine AM, Lafleur M, Meier C, Petereit UH, Leroux CJ (2003) Characterization of the membrane-destabilizing properties of different pH-sensitive methacrylic acid copolymers. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1613:28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tonge RS, Tighe JB (2001) Responsive hydrophobically associating polymers: a review of structure and properties. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 53:109–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen R, Khormaee S, Eccleston EM, Slater KN (2009) The role of hydrophobic amino acid grafts in the enhancement of membrane-disruptive activity of pH-responsive pseudo-peptides. Biomaterials 30:1954–1961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, partially by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (23225004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuru Akashi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 7180 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shima, F., Akagi, T. & Akashi, M. Synthesis and preparation of nanoparticles composed of amphiphilic poly(γ-glutamic acid) with different hydrophobic side chains and their potential of membrane disruptive activity. Colloid Polym Sci 292, 2663–2671 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-014-3303-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-014-3303-z

Keywords

Navigation