Basic Research in Cardiology

, 107:284

Is altered atrial microRNA-ome a critical contributor to the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation?

Invited Editorial

DOI: 10.1007/s00395-012-0284-2

Cite this article as:
Dobrev, D. Basic Res Cardiol (2012) 107: 284. doi:10.1007/s00395-012-0284-2
  • 777 Downloads

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmia in the clinical setting and is associated with substantial cardiac morbidity and mortality [19]. Current drug interventions have limited efficacy and are accompanied by significant risk of proarrhythmic events [9]. The generally poor outcome with current antiarrhythmic drugs likely reflects the fact that most of the used agents were developed in the absence of precise understanding of pro- and anti-arrhythmic drug actions and the arrhythmogenic disease-specific cardiac substrate. Conceptually, AF induction requires a vulnerable substrate and a trigger that acts on the substrate to initiate the arrhythmia [25, 35]. Once AF is initiated, the rapid-atrial rate creates progressive AF-related changes in atrial electrical and structural properties (atrial remodeling). Electrical remodeling involves a shortening of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and abnormal atrial Ca2+ signaling, whereas increased atrial fibrosis and heterogeneous conduction slowing are typical characteristics of structural remodeling. Atrial remodeling can promote ectopic (triggered) activity and facilitate reentry, thereby contributing to AF perpetuation and the progression from short-lasting (paroxysmal) to long-standing persistent AF [7, 10, 25, 26, 35], which makes AF more resistant to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches. Therefore, it is assumed that a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying AF maintenance will help to design novel drugs with improved efficacy and safety profiles [8].

The mechanisms contributing to ectopic activity and reentry during AF are incompletely understood. Recent studies have provided compelling evidence that alterations in atrial microRNA (miR) expression could contribute to the basic mechanisms of AF [36]. MiRs are small (20–25 nucleotides) non-coding RNAs that bind to complementary sequences in the 3′ untranslated regions of target mRNA in a sequence-specific manner, usually resulting in gene silencing by either blocking translation or directing degradation [20, 27]. They act in a complex functional network in which individual miRs can control hundreds of genes and a single gene can be regulated by multiple miRs. Because miRs are central players in the regulation of gene expression, they participate in many physiological processes, including differentiation, proliferation, migration, metabolism, apoptosis and cell death. Therefore, it is not surprising that miR dysfunction plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases [24].

In this issue of the journal, Adam et al. [2] show that miR-21, which was previously shown to play a crucial role in cardiac remodeling by affecting ERK-MAP kinase signaling in ventricular fibroblasts [31], is a critical regulator of atrial fibrosis formation and a potential contributor to the evolution of structural remodeling in AF patients. They reported that miR-21 is increased in left atria of AF patients and is associated with reduced expression of the cysteine-rich signaling protein Sprouty1, which is an endogenous suppressor of fibroblasts ERK-MAP signaling. Using cardiac fibroblasts they also demonstrated that the increase in miR-21 and the decrease in Sprouty1 could be reproduced by activation of a small GTPase of the Rho family (Rac1), connective-tissue growth-factor (CTGF) and lysyl oxidase with angiotensin-II. They also showed that overexpression of lysyl oxidase resulted in enhanced expression of Droscha and Dicer, two important endonucleases for miR formation, mechanistically linking lysyl oxidase and miR-21 formation. Moreover, Rac1 overexpressing mice, which develop spontaneous AF at older age [1], exhibited increased atrial levels of miR-21, decreased Sprouty1 expression and elevated CTGF, lysyl oxidase and atrial fibrosis. Most importantly, inhibition of Rac1 with statins reduced atrial fibrosis, likely because of decreased miR-21 levels with concomitant increases in Sprouty1 expression. Finally, they showed that inhibition of miR-21 with chemically modified antisense oligonucleotides specific for miR-21 (antagomir-21) prevented atrial fibrosis secondary to myocardial infarction, suggesting that the direct silencing of miR-21 by antagomirs might be a potential therapeutic option to target atrial fibrosis in AF patients.

The elegant study of Adam et al. [2] adds miR-21 to the growing list of miRs implicated in the fundamental AF mechanisms (Fig. 1). The reentry-promoting shortening of the action potential duration is largely due to reduced L-type Ca2+ current and enhanced inward-rectifier (IK1 and a constitutive form of the acetylcholine-gated IK,ACh) and slow delayed-rectifier (IKs) K+ currents [3, 7, 10]. Although the molecular basis of these ion current abnormalities is multifactorial [35], there is evidence for involvement of altered miR expression in all of these current abnormalities (Fig. 1). Repressed translation of α1C (Cav1.2) and β1 (Cavβ1) ICa,L subunits by enhanced miR-328 is one potential mechanism of reduced ICa,L in human AF [21]. The KCNQ1 gene encoding the major IKs channel subunit contains putative binding sites for miR-1, which potentially links reduced miR-1 [13] levels with enhanced IKs current in AF patients [3]. Reduced levels of miR-1 [13], miR-26 and miR-101 [22], which repress expression of the principal IK1 subunit Kir2.1 (KCNJ2), enhance Kir2.1 proteins levels contributing to the larger IK1 in human AF [34]. Recent work identified Na+–Ca2+ exchanger 1 (NCX1) as a novel target of miR-1 [17], suggesting that deregulated miR-1 may contribute to the higher NCX expression and function in AF patients [14]. However, reduced miR-1 is not a consistent finding in AF, because unaltered [21] and enhanced miR-1 levels [4] have also been reported. The reason for these inconsistent findings in atrial miR levels among studies is not known, but might reflect use of right versus left atrial tissue and differences in age, concomitant diseases and medication in the studied patient populations [5, 12, 29]. Interestingly, overexpression of miR-1 enhances the incidence of spontaneous sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+-release events by increasing steady-state S2814 phosphorylation of type-2 ryanodine receptor channels (RyR2) through a selective miR-1-induced decrease in B56α expression, which targets the protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) to specific subcellular microdomains [30]. Myocytes from AF patients show S2814-hyperphosphorylated RyR2 and a higher incidence of spontaneous SR Ca2+-release events and delayed afterdepolarizations leading to triggered activity/abnormal automaticity [11, 33]. This points to the possibility that the hyperphosphorylation-mediated RyR2 dysfunction in AF patients may at least in part result from increased miR-1 levels, which may decrease PP2A activity within the RyR2 macromolecular complex despite the global increase of PP2A activity in AF patients [15].
Fig. 1

Schematic highlighting putative contribution of altered atrial miR expression to established fundamental mechanisms of AF. ICa,L L-type Ca2+ current, IK1 inward-rectifier K+ current, IKs slow delayed-rectifier K+ current, TRPC3 transient-receptor potential C type-3 channel, RyR2 ryanodine-receptor type-2, NCX1 Na+–Ca2+ exchanger type-1, PP2A protein phosphatase 2A, B56α 56 kDa regulatory subunit alpha of PP2A, ERP effective refractory period, DADs delayed afterdepolarizations. The miR identified by Adam et al. [2] as a critical regulator of atrial fibrosis formation (miR-21) is underlined

In addition to electrical and Ca2+-handling remodeling, miRs also promote structural remodeling in AF. Shan et al. [28] showed that downregulation of miR-133 and miR-590 contributes to nicotine-induced atrial structural remodeling in canines. The downregulation of these two antifibrotic miRs significantly increased the protein levels of transforming growth-factor β1 (TGF-β1) and its type-II receptor, and enhanced collagen production. The profibrotic mediator TGF-β1 is secreted by both fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes and cardiac-overexpression of constitutively-active TGF-β1 causes selective atrial fibrosis and conduction heterogeneity, increasing AF susceptibility [32]. miR-29 inhibits collagen genes and miR-29 downregulation likely contributes to atrial fibrosis in heart failure [6]. CTGF is a downstream mediator of TGF-β1 profibrotic signaling and miR-30 and miR-133, which suppress CTGF production, are downregulated in chronic AF [18]. In addition, recent work suggests that Ca2+-entry through non-selective transient-receptor potential (TRP) C type-3 (TRPC3) channels is central to AF-related fibroblast activation [16]. Fibroblast TRPC3 expression is increased in AF, mediates angiotensin-II-induced Ca2+ influx and promotes fibroblast proliferation and differentiation [16]. Moreover, TRPC3-expression is controlled by miR-26 [16], creating a mechanistic link between signaling pathways affecting electrical and structural remodeling. The present study of Adam et al. [2] extends these findings by being the first to show that miR-21 is an important contributor to atrial fibrosis and structural remodeling in AF patients. This paper also points to new therapeutic options to prevent structural remodeling by targeting miR-21 and the related signaling involving activation of TGF-β1, CTGF, Rac1 and lysyl oxidase pathways.

Taken together, the emerging role of miRs in AF-promoting atrial remodeling presents potentially exciting therapeutic opportunities. miRs are stable in blood and interventions have been developed to enhance or suppress the expression of miRs involved in disease progression [27]. The apparent participation of miRs in the fundamental AF mechanisms, including APD reduction, abnormal SR Ca2+ release, and tissue fibrosis points to potential novel mechanism-based therapeutic targets. Finally, better insights into the molecular basis of AF may allow to identity AF biomarkers [23], thus helping to develop personalized therapeutic approaches.

Acknowledgments

The author’s work is supported by the European Network for Translational Research in Atrial Fibrillation (EUTRAF, Grant 261057), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (AF Competence Network and German Center for Cardiovascular Research), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Do 769/1-3), and by a grant from Fondation Leducq (European-North American Atrial Fibrillation Research Alliance, Grant 07CVD03). The author is also thankful to Jordi Heijman for critical reading and his help with the figure.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Experimental Cardiology, Medical Faculty MannheimHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations