Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the R-wave voltage in lead aVL: population-based study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

According to hypertension guidelines, the recommended electrocardiographic (ECG) diagnostic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) are the Sokolow–Lyon and Cornel voltage criteria, both with general acceptance by primary care physicians. However, it was recently reported that the R-wave voltage in lead aVL (RaVL) was as good as other more complicated and time-consuming ECG criteria to detect LVH in hypertensive patients. Therefore, our aim was to investigate if the ability of the RaVL to identify echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECHO-LVH) could be translated to the general population, a more realistic assessment of its utility in a nonreferral setting.

Methods

682 participants (43.5 % males), aged between 27 and 72 years from the urban population of Vitoria, ES, Brazil, were enrolled. We investigated the association of ECHO-LVH (LV mass >51 g/Ht2.7) with several ECG voltage measurements: Sokolow–Lyon and Cornel criteria, S-wave voltage in lead V3 (SV3) and RaVL.

Results

The RaVL showed the best positive correlation with LV mass indexed to Ht2.7, superior to both Cornell and Sokolow–Lyon criteria and was not influenced by gender. Analysis of the ROC curves showed that the RaVL depicted a significant superior performance in relation to all the other measurements in the ability to detect ECHO-LVH. SV3 was not correlated with LV mass. Thus, it seems that most of Cornell’s performance depends on its simplified version, that is, RaVL.

Conclusion

We have shown that the simple and single assessment of RaVL presented a greater diagnostic ability in detecting ECHO-LVH in the general population, signaling its value mainly as a screening tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bacharova L (2009) Electrocardiography-left ventricular mass discrepancies in left ventricular hypertrophy: electrocardiography imperfection or beyond perfection? J Electrocardiol 42:593–596. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Casale PN, Devereux RB, Kligfield P, Eisenberg RR, Miller DH, Chaudhary BS, Phillips MC (1985) Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: development and prospective validation of improved criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol 6:572–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Casiglia E, Schiavon L, Tikhonoff V, Bascelli A, Martini B, Mazza A, Caffi S, D’Este D, Bagato F, Bolzon M, Guidotti F, Haxhi Nasto H, Saugo M, Guglielmi F, Pessina AC (2008) Electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy in general population. Eur J Epidemiol 23:261–271. doi:10.1007/s10654-008-9234-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chinitz JS, Cooper JM, Verdino RJ (2008) Electrocardiogram voltage discordance: interpretation of low QRS voltage only in the limb leads. J Electrocardiol 41:281–286. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ, National Heart L, Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention DE, Treatment of High Blood P, National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating C (2003) The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 289:2560–2572. doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Colossimo AP, Costa Fde A, Riera AR, Bombig MT, Lima VC, Fonseca FA, Izar MC, LF B, Souza D, Povoa RM (2011) Electrocardiogram sensitivity in left ventricular hypertrophy according to gender and cardiac mass. Arq Bras Cardiol 97:225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuspidi C, Grassi G (2012) Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left-ventricular hypertrophy: good news for the clinician? J Hypertens 30:884–886. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328353093d

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. de Simone G, Daniels SR, Devereux RB, Meyer RA, Roman MJ, de Divitiis O, Alderman MH (1992) Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:1251–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Meyer RA (1995) Gender differences in left ventricular growth. Hypertension 26:979–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Simone G, Kizer JR, Chinali M, Roman MJ, Bella JN, Best LG, Lee ET, Devereux RB, Strong Heart Study I (2005) Normalization for body size and population-attributable risk of left ventricular hypertrophy: the Strong Heart Study. Am J Hypertens 18:191–196. doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.08.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N (1986) Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 57:450–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Du Bois D, Du Bois EF (1989) A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition 5:303–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerdts E, Cramariuc D, de Simone G, Wachtell K, Dahlof B, Devereux RB (2008) Impact of left ventricular geometry on prognosis in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (the LIFE study). Eur J Echocardiogr 9:809–815. doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jen155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gosse P, Jan E, Coulon P, Cremer A, Papaioannou G, Yeim S (2012) ECG detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: the simpler, the better? J Hypertens 30:990–996. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283524961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohsaka S, Sciacca RR, Sugioka K, Sacco RL, Homma S, Di Tullio MR (2005) Additional impact of electrocardiographic over echocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy for predicting the risk of ischemic stroke. Am Heart J 149:181–186. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, Grassi G, Heagerty AM, Kjeldsen SE, Laurent S, Narkiewicz K, Ruilope L, Rynkiewicz A, Schmieder RE, Boudier HA, Zanchetti A, Vahanian A, Camm J, De Caterina R, Dean V, Dickstein K, Filippatos G, Funck-Brentano C, Hellemans I, Kristensen SD, McGregor K, Sechtem U, Silber S, Tendera M, Widimsky P, Zamorano JL, Erdine S, Kiowski W, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, Lindholm LH, Viigimaa M, Adamopoulos S, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, Bertomeu V, Clement D, Erdine S, Farsang C, Gaita D, Lip G, Mallion JM, Manolis AJ, Nilsson PM, O’Brien E, Ponikowski P, Redon J, Ruschitzka F, Tamargo J, van Zwieten P, Waeber B, Williams B, Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of H, European Society of C (2007) 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 25:1105–1187. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3281fc975a

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8:283–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Norman JE Jr, Levy D (1995) Improved electrocardiographic detection of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy: results of a correlated data base approach. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:1022–1029. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00269-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pewsner D, Juni P, Egger M, Battaglia M, Sundstrom J, Bachmann LM (2007) Accuracy of electrocardiography in diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension: systematic review. BMJ 335:711. doi:10.1136/bmj.39276.636354.AE

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pierdomenico SD, Cuccurullo F (2010) Risk reduction after regression of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 23:876–881. doi:10.1038/ajh.2010.80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pires de Sousa AG, Pereira AC, Marquezine GF, Marques do Nascimento-Neto R, Freitas SN, de C Nicolato RL, Machado-Coelho GL, Rodrigues SL, Mill JG, Krieger JE (2009) Derivation and external validation of a simple prediction model for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Brazilian urban population. Eur J Epidemiol 24:101–109. doi:10.1007/s10654-009-9314-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodrigues SL, Angelo LC, Pereira AC, Krieger JE, Mill JG (2009) Determinants of left ventricular mass and presence of metabolic risk factors in normotensive individuals. Int J Cardiol 135:323–330. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodrigues SL, D’Angelo L, Pereira AC, Krieger JE, Mill JG (2008) Revision of the Sokolow–Lyon–Rappaport and Cornell voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Arq Bras Cardiol 90:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodriguez-Padial L, Bacharova L (2012) Electrical remodeling in left ventricular hypertrophy-is there a unifying hypothesis for the variety of electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy? J Electrocardiol 45:494–497. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A (1978) Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 58:1072–1083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Salles GF, Cardoso CR, Fiszman R, Muxfeldt ES (2010) Prognostic impact of baseline and serial changes in electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in resistant hypertension. Am Heart J 159:833–840. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.02.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schack JA, Rosenman RH, Katz LN (1950) The aV limb leads in the diagnosis of ventricular strain. Am Heart J 40:696–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schocken DD (2012) Reexamining electrocardiogram criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy-new concepts from an old tool. J Electrocardiol 45:498–499. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.06.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia SBC, Sociedade Brasileira deHipertensao SBH, Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia SBN (2007) V Brazilian guidelines in arterial hypertension. Arq Bras Cardiol 89:e24–e79

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sokolow M, Lyon TP (1949) The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J 37:161–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sundstrom J, Lind L, Arnlov J, Zethelius B, Andren B, Lithell HO (2001) Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic diagnoses of left ventricular hypertrophy predict mortality independently of each other in a population of elderly men. Circulation 103:2346–2351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Verdecchia P, Angeli F (2003) The seventh report of the joint national committee on the prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure: the weapons are ready. Rev Esp Cardiol 56:843–847

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Cavallini C, Mazzotta G, Repaci S, Pede S, Borgioni C, Gentile G, Reboldi G (2009) The voltage of R wave in lead aVL improves risk stratification in hypertensive patients without ECG left ventricular hypertrophy. J Hypertens 27:1697–1704. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e32832c0031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Gattobigio R, Zampi I, Porcellati C (1998) Prognostic value of a new electrocardiographic method for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:383–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Verdecchia P, Staessen JA, Angeli F, de Simone G, Achilli A, Ganau A, Mureddu G, Pede S, Maggioni AP, Lucci D, Reboldi G, Cardio-Sis i (2009) Usual versus tight control of systolic blood pressure in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 374:525–533. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61340-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Williams B, Poulter NR, Brown MJ, Davis M, McInnes GT, Potter JF, Sever PS, Mc GTS, British Hypertension S (2004) Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV. J Hum Hypertens 18:139–185. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1001683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sérgio Lamêgo Rodrigues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodrigues, S.L., Ângelo, L.C.S., Baldo, M.P. et al. Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the R-wave voltage in lead aVL: population-based study. Clin Res Cardiol 102, 653–659 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-013-0578-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-013-0578-x

Keywords

Navigation