International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 1377–1381

Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence and urinary incontinence in female patients: long-term follow-up

Authors

  • Galal El-Gazzaz
    • Department of Colorectal Surgery A30Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    • Department of Colorectal Surgery A30Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Levilester Salcedo
    • Department of Colorectal Surgery A30Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Jeff Hammel
    • Department of Colorectal Surgery A30Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Raymond Rackley
    • Department of UrologyCleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Tracy Hull
    • Department of Colorectal Surgery A30Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0745-8

Cite this article as:
El-Gazzaz, G., Zutshi, M., Salcedo, L. et al. Int J Colorectal Dis (2009) 24: 1377. doi:10.1007/s00384-009-0745-8

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate improvement in symptoms of fecal incontinence (FI) in a group of women who also had urinary incontinence (UI) and were successfully implanted with the sacral neuromodulation (SNM) device primarily for urinary incontinence in one US institution.

Methods

Twenty-four patients with FI and UI who failed to improve with conservative or standard surgical treatment underwent permanent SNM after a successful peripheral nerve stimulation test during 2003–2007. Wexner incontinence score, fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL), and Bristol stool scales were recorded before and after treatment. Follow-up was done by questionnaires contact.

Results

Twenty-four patients (mean age 56.5 ± 5.3 years) were studied. The median follow-up was 28 months (range 3–49). Twenty-two patients (92%) were contacted. Seven patients (31.8%) experienced improvement in both urinary and fecal incontinence symptoms. Twelve patients (54.5%) experienced no improvement in FI symptoms after SNM. Four patients required a colostomy or ileostomy; four had the system explanted (two, due to a faded clinical response and two, due to infection); and four other patients experienced no improvement after SNM. The outcomes of ten patients (45.5%) with functioning SNM were reviewed. There were significant improvement of FI symptoms with a significantly lower Wexner score from 12.0 ± 2.0 before SNM to 4.7 ± 3.6 (p = 0.009). The mean FIQL scores improved significantly from the baseline score 7.8 ± 0.8 before SNM to 13.5 ± 2.6 (p = 0.009). Bristol stool form scale was reduced significantly from 4.5 to 3.5 after SNM (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

SNM may be beneficial in selected female patients with UI associated with FI. Prospective trials may help delineate which patients will show FI improvement in this combined group.

Keywords

Sacral nerve modulationSacral nerve stimulationFecal incontinenceUrinary incontinenceDouble incontinenceQuality of life

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009