International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 105–113

History of negative colorectal endoscopy and risk of rectosigmoid neoplasms at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

Authors

    • Secondary Prevention and ScreeningIstituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  • Stefania Sciallero
    • Unit of Medical OncologyOspedale San Martino
  • Carlo Senore
    • Unit of EpidemiologyCPO
  • Marco Zappa
    • Unit of Clinical EpidemiologyCSPO
  • Hugo Aste
    • Department of Oncology, Biology and GeneticsUniversità degli Studi
  • Bruno Andreoni
    • Unit of Surgery IIstituto Europeo di Oncologia
  • Donato Angioli
    • Unit of GastroenterologyCentro Oncologico
  • Roberto Ferraris
    • Unit of GastroenterologyOspedale Mauriziano Umberto I
  • Stefano Gasperoni
    • Unit of GastroenterologyOspedale degli Infermi
  • Giuseppe Malfitana
    • Unit of GastroenterologyOspedale degli Infermi
  • Marco Pennazio
    • Unit of GastroenterologyOspedale San Giovanni AS
  • Wendy Atkin
    • Colorectal Cancer UnitImperial Research Fund
  • Nereo Segnan
    • Unit of EpidemiologyCPO
  • SCORE Working Group
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00384-005-0775-9

Cite this article as:
Bonelli, L., Sciallero, S., Senore, C. et al. Int J Colorectal Dis (2006) 21: 105. doi:10.1007/s00384-005-0775-9

Abstract

Background and aims

Screening sigmoidoscopy can reduce incidence of colorectal cancer and mortality. The optimal re-screening interval has not yet been defined. This study is aimed at estimating the risk of distal advanced adenomas (diameter ≥10 mm, villous component >20%, high-grade dysplasia) and cancer at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in subjects aged 55–64 years who reported pre-screening negative colorectal endoscopy.

Patients

Eight thousands two hundred two subjects aged 55–64 years who underwent screening flexible sigmoidoscopy within the SCORE trial in Italy and who were able to report their previous history of colorectal endoscopy.

Results

Eight hundred eighty three of 8,202 subjects (10.8%) reported at least one prescreening negative endoscopy: among them, after 3–5 years, 6–10 years and >10 years intervals between last reported examination and screening endoscopy, the Absolute Risk of advanced adenomas was 1.5%, 0.9% and 0.9%; one cancer was detected (0.1%). Among the 7,319 subjects who did not report prescreening endoscopy the risks of advanced adenoma and cancer were 3.2% and 0.4%, respectively. Subjects with a previous colorectal examination had a 65% decreased risk of advanced adenomas (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.18–0.66) and a 71% decreased risk of cancer (OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.04–1.12) as compared to those who did not. For subjects without family history of colorectal cancer the statistically significant decrease of the risk persisted up to ten years. The observed benefit seems not to apply to subjects with family history of colorectal cancer.

Conclusions

Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the interval between screening sigmoidoscopies could be safely expanded beyond 5 years for subjects without specific risk factors for colorectal cancer.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005