Newborn circumcision outcomes: Are parents satisfied with the results?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Although physician-reported complications following circumcision are very low, parental satisfaction is not well documented. This study examined parental opinions and compared these with those of the medical professional.
Physicians independently assessed complications and cosmetic outcome following the circumcision. Six weeks post-circumcision, parental report of complications, cosmetic outcome, and overall satisfaction were assessed.
Newborn infants (n = 710) were prospectively recruited and underwent either a Gomco [n = 552 (78 %)] or Plastibell® [n = 158 (22 %)] circumcision. Physician assessed complication rates were equivalent (Gomco 4.3 % versus Plastibell 5.1 %; p = 0.67), however, parental assessment found a much lower complication rate for Gomco 5.6 % versus Plastibell 12.0 % (p < 0.001). There was no difference between who performed the procedure nor between the techniques in regards to parental rating of overall satisfaction (excellent/good: Gomco 96.9 % versus Plastibell 95.6 %, p = 0.45). However, perceived post-operative pain as scored by parents was significantly higher in patients undergoing Plastibell procedure (6.4 % too much pain) versus Gomco (2.7 %; p = 0.05). Gomco accounted for 72.7 % of parental cosmetically unsatisfactory cases.
Clinicians and parents differed considerably in terms of opinion of cosmetic outcome and occurrence of post-operative complications. This study emphasizes the need for clinicians to better understand and address parental concerns before and after circumcision.
- Nagdeve NG, Nalk H, Bhingare PD, Morey SM (2013) Parental evaluation of postoperative outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection by dorsal slit technique: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Urol 9(5):675–682. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.08.001
- AAP Task Force on Circumcision (2012) Male circumcision. Pediatrics 130(3):e756–e785. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1990
- AAP Task Force on Circumcision (2012) Circumcision Policy Statement. Pediatrics 130(3):585–586 CrossRef
- Futaba K, Bowley DM (2010) The foreskin: problems and pathology. J Pediatr Surg 28(8):387–390
- Kaplan GW (1983) Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin N Amer 10(3):543–549
- Van Howe RS (1997) Variability in penile appearance and penile findings: a prospective study. Br J Urol 80:776–782 CrossRef
- Brisson PA, Patel HI, Feins NR (2002) Revision of circumcision in children: report of 56 cases. J Pediatr Surg 37:1343–1346 CrossRef
- Linn LS, Cope DW, Leake B (1984) The effect of gender and training of residents on satisfaction ratings by patients. J Med Educ 59:964–966
- Jha AK, Joynt KE, Orav EJ (2012) Epstein AM the long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 366:1606–1615 CrossRef
- Weiss HA, Larke N, Halperin D, Schenker I (2010) Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review. BMC Urol 10:2 CrossRef
- Wu X, Wang Y, Zheng J, Shen W, Yan JA, Ji H, Li X, Zhang H, Zhou Z (2013) A report of 918 cases of circumcision with the shang ring: comparison between children and adults. Urology 81(5):1058–1063 CrossRef
- Newborn circumcision outcomes: Are parents satisfied with the results?
Pediatric Surgery International
Volume 30, Issue 3 , pp 333-338
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Additional Links
- Redundant foreskin
- Post-operative hemorrhage
- Parental satisfaction
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- 3. Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA