Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional climate model sensitivity to domain size

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regional climate models are increasingly used to add small-scale features that are not present in their lateral boundary conditions (LBC). It is well known that the limited area over which a model is integrated must be large enough to allow the full development of small-scale features. On the other hand, integrations on very large domains have shown important departures from the driving data, unless large scale nudging is applied. The issue of domain size is studied here by using the “perfect model” approach. This method consists first of generating a high-resolution climatic simulation, nicknamed big brother (BB), over a large domain of integration. The next step is to degrade this dataset with a low-pass filter emulating the usual coarse-resolution LBC. The filtered nesting data (FBB) are hence used to drive a set of four simulations (LBs for Little Brothers), with the same model, but on progressively smaller domain sizes. The LB statistics for a climate sample of four winter months are compared with BB over a common region. The time average (stationary) and transient-eddy standard deviation patterns of the LB atmospheric fields generally improve in terms of spatial correlation with the reference (BB) when domain gets smaller. The extraction of the small-scale features by using a spectral filter allows detecting important underestimations of the transient-eddy variability in the vicinity of the inflow boundary, which can penalize the use of small domains (less than 100 × 100 grid points). The permanent “spatial spin-up” corresponds to the characteristic distance that the large-scale flow needs to travel before developing small-scale features. The spin-up distance tends to grow in size at higher levels in the atmosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antic S, Laprise R, Denis B, de Elía R (2004) Testing the downscaling ability of a one-way nested regional climate model in regions of complex topography. Clim Dyn 23:473–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa A, Lamb V (1977) Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of UCLA General Circulation Model. Methods in Computational Physics, vol 17. Academic Press, New York, pp 173–265

  • Bärring L, Laprise R (eds) (2005) Extended Abstracts “High-resolution climate modelling: Assessment, added value and applications”. WMO/WCRP-sponsored regional-scale climate modelling Workshop, 29 March–2 April 2004, Lund (Sweden). Lund University electronic reports in physical geography, 132 pp. (http://www.nateko.lu.se/ELibrary/Lerpg/5/Lerpg5Article.pdf)

  • CAS/JSC WGNE (1999) Report of fourteenth session of CAS/JSC working group on numerical experimentation no.14, 28 pp

  • CAS/JSC WGNE (2000) Report of fifteenth session of CAS/JSC working group on numerical experimentation no.15, 29 pp

  • Caya D, Laprise R (1999) A semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian regional climate model: the Canadian RCM. Mon Weather Rev 127:341–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies HC (1976) A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 102:405–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis B, Côté J, Laprise R (2002a) Spectral decomposition of two-dimensional atmospheric fields on limited-area domains using discrete cosine transform (DCT). Mon Weather Rev 130:1812–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis B, Laprise R, Caya D, Côté J (2002b) Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models: The Big-Brother experiment. Clim Dyn 18:627–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis B, Laprise R, Caya D (2003) Sensitivity of a regional climate model to the resolution of the lateral boundary conditions. Clim Dyn 20:107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconescu EP, Laprise R, Sushama L (2007) The impact of lateral boundary data errors on the simulated climate of a nested regional climate model. Clim Dyn 28:333–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic M, Laprise R (2005) Validation of the nesting technique in a RCM and sensitivity tests to the resolution of the lateral boundary conditions during summer. Clim Dyn 25:555–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Elia R, Laprise R, Denis B (2002) Forecasting skill limits of nested, limited-area models: a perfect-model approach. Mon Weather Rev 130:2006–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Chen T, Somerville RCJ (1975) On the use of a coordinate transformation for the solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. J Comput Phys 17:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Bates GT (1989) The climatological skill of a regional model over complex terrain. Mon Weather Rev 117:2325–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Mearns LO (1999) Introduction to special section: regional climate modeling revisited. J Geophys Res 104:6335–6352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RG, Murphy JM, Noguer M (1995) Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional-climate model. I: Assessment of control climate, including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 121:1413–1449

    Google Scholar 

  • Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1990) A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J Atmos Sci 47:2784–2802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laprise R (2008) Regional climate modelling. J Comput Phys, Special issue on “Predicting weather, climate and extreme events” 227:3641–3666

  • McFarlane NA, Boer GJ, Blanchet J-P, Lazare M (1992) The Canadian Climate Centre Second-Generation General Circulation Model and its equilibrium climate. J Clim 5:1013–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor JL (1997) Regional climate modelling. Meteorol Atmos Phys 63:105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguez-Macho G, Stenchikov GL, Robock A (2004) Spectral nudging to eliminate the effects of domain position and geometry in regional climate model simulations. J Geophys Res 109(D13):D13104. doi:10.1029/2003JD004495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquin D, Caya D (2000) New convection scheme in the Canadian Regional Climate Model. In: Ritchie H (ed) Research activities in atmospheric and oceanic modelling, WMO/TD-No. 987, Report No. 30, 7.14–7.15

  • Robert A., Yakimiw E. (1986) Identification and elimination of an inflow boundary computational solution in limited area model integration. Atmos Ocean 24:369–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Seth A, Giorgi F (1998) The effects of domain choice on summer precipitation simulation and sensitivity in a regional climate model. J Clim 11:2698–2712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seth A, Rojas M (2003) Simulation and Sensitivity in a Nested Modeling System for South America. Part I: Reanalyses boundary forcing. J Clim 16:2437–2453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res 106 (D7):7183–7192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakimiw E, Robert A (1990) Validation experiments for a nested grid-point regional forecast model. Atmos Ocean 28:466–472

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was done as part of the Masters project of the first author and as a project within the Canadian Regional Climate Modelling and Diagnostics (CRCMD) Network, funded by the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS) and the Ouranos Consortium for Regional Climatology and Adaptation to Climate Change. We would like to thank MM. Claude Desrochers and Mourad Labassi for maintaining a user-friendly local computing facility. Thanks are also extended to the Ouranos Climate Simulation Team for their support of the CRCM software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Leduc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leduc, M., Laprise, R. Regional climate model sensitivity to domain size. Clim Dyn 32, 833–854 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0400-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0400-z

Keywords

Navigation