A comparison of GPS- and NWP-derived PW data over the Korean Peninsula
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Precipitable Water (PW) derived from Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements and numerical weather prediction (NWP) model analysis data were compared to further evaluate the efficacy of applying GPS-derived PW to the NWP model. The spatial and temporal variations of GPS-derived PW during a rainfall event were also examined.
GPS-derived PW measurements show good agreement with the behavior of water vapor at a high spatial resolution during the analysis period. Temporal anomalies of GPS-derived PW moving along with the front are successfully detected by the GPS array. Large positive anomalies of GPS-derived PW are indicated immediately before a rainfall event, and the intensity of these positive anomalies do not seem to decrease significantly as the precipitation system passes. These results indicate that the Korean GPS network may have great potential as a PW sensor over the Korean Peninsula.
In contrast with GPS-derived PW, NWP-derived PW shows negative biases. These biases appear to stem mainly from the differences between modeled and actual GPS site elevations, as GPS sites were generally located at elevations lower than those employed by the NWP model. However, there still exists a discernable dry bias after a PW correction is applied to NWP-derived PW.
GPS-derived PW better reflects the spatial and temporal moisture variations of precipitation systems, as compared to NWP-derived PW. These results provide entirely new information for improving the regional NWP system, since GPS-derived PW produced with data from the Korean GPS network may be incorporated into the NWP model to improve rainfall forecasts.
- Bevis, M., S. Businger, T. Herring, C. Rocken, R. Anthes, and R. Ware, 1992: GPS Meteorology: Remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using the Global Positioning System. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 15787–15801.
- Bevis, M., S. Businger, S. Chiswell, T. A. Herring, R. A. Anthes, C. Rochen, and R. H. Ware, 1994: GPS Meteorology: Mapping zenith wet delays onto precipitable water. J. Appl. Meteor., 33, 379–386. CrossRef
- Beutler, G., and Coauthors, 2000: Bernese GPS software version 4.2. Astronomical Institute, University of Berne, 436pp.
- Bock, O., C. Keil, E. Richard, C. Flammant, and M.-N. Bouin, 2005: Validations of precipitable water from ECMWF model analyses with GPS data during the MAP IOP. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 1–24. CrossRef
- Cao, Y., Z. Fang, and Q. Xia, 2005: Relationship between GPS precipitable water vapor and precipitation. J. Appl. Meteor. Sci., 16(1), 54–59.
- Davis, J. L., T. A. Herring, I. I. Shapiro, A. E. E. Rogers, and G. Elgered, 1985: Geodesy by ratio interferometry: Effects of atmospheric modeling errors on estimates of baseline length. Radio. Sci., 20, 1593–1607. CrossRef
- Dietrich, S. V. R., K.-P. Johnsen, J. Miao, and G. Heygster, 2004: Comparison of tropospheric water vapor over Antarctica derived from AMSU-B data, groundbased GPS data and the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 82, 259–267. CrossRef
- Duan, J., and Coauthors, 1996: Meteorology: Direct estimation of the absolute value of precipitable water. J. Appl. Meteorol., 35, 830–838. CrossRef
- Ducrocq, V., D. Ricard, J.-P. Lafore, and F. Orain, 2002: Storm-scale numerical rainfall prediction for ?ve precipitating events over France: On the importance of the initial humidity field. Weather and Forecasting, 17, 1236–1256. CrossRef
- Emardson, T. R., G. Elgered, and J. Johansson, 1998: Three months of continuous monitoring of atmospheric water vapor with a network of GPS receivers. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 1807–1820. CrossRef
- Faccani, C., R. Ferretti, and G. Visconti, 2003: Highresolution weather forecasting over complex orography: Sensitivity to the assimilation of conventional data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 136–154. CrossRef
- Falvey, M., and J. Beavan, 2002: The impact of GPS precipitable water assimilation on mesoscale model retrievals of orographic rainfall during SALPEX’96. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2874–2888. CrossRef
- Fang, P., M. Bevis, Y. Bock, S. Gutman, and D. Wolfe, 1998: GPS meteorology: Reducing systematic errors in geodetic estimates for zenith delay. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3583–3586. CrossRef
- Gradinarsky, L. P., J. M. Johansson, H. R. Bouma, H.-G. Scherneck, and G. Elgered, 2002: Climate monitoring using GPS. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 27, 335–340.
- Guo, Y. R., Y. H. Kuo, J. Dudhia, D. Parsons, and C. Rocken, 2000: Four dimensional variational data assimilation of heterogeneous mesoscale observations for a strong convective case. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 619–643. CrossRef
- Iwabuchi, T., I. Naito, and N. Mannoji, 2000: A comparison of Global Positioning System retrieved precipitable water vapor with the numerical weather prediction analysis data over the Japanese Islands. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 4573–4585. CrossRef
- Koch, S. E., Aksakal, A. and McQueen, J. T., 1997: The in?uence of mesoscale humidity and evapotranspira tion ?elds on a model forecast of a cold frontal squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 384–409. CrossRef
- Kopken, C., 2001: Validation of integrated water vapor from numerical models using ground-based GPS, SSM/I, and water vapor radiometer measurements. J. Appl. Meteorol., 40, 1105–1117. CrossRef
- Kuo, Y.-H., Y.-R. Guo, and E. R. Westwater, 1993: Assimilation of precipitable water measurements into a mesosclae numerical model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1215–1238. CrossRef
- Kuo, Y.-H., X. Zou, and Y.-R. Guo, 1996: Variational assimilation of precipitable water using a nonhydrostatic mesoscale adjoint model. I: Moisture retrieval and sensitivity experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 122–147. CrossRef
- Kwon, H.-T., T. Iwabuchi, and G.-H. Lim, 2007: Comparison of precipitable water derived from ground-based GPS measurements with radiosonde observation over the Korean Peninsula. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85, 733–746. CrossRef
- Mannoji, N., H. Tada, Y. Hatanaka, R. Ohtani, and I. Naito, 1998: An impact study of precipitable water estimated from ground-based GPS network over Japan. 12th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, 11–16 January 1998, 77–80.
- Ohtani, R., and I. Naito, 2000: Comparisons of GPSderived precipitable water vapors with radiosonde observations in Japan. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 26917–26930. CrossRef
- Rocken, C., R. Ware, T. Van Hove, F. Solheim, C. Alber, J. Jhonson, M. Bevis, and S. Businger, 1993: Sensing atmospheric water vapor with the Global Positioning System. Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 2631–2634. CrossRef
- Rocken, C., T. Van Hove, J. Johnson, F. Solheim, and R. Ware, 1995: GPS/STORM-GPS sensing of atmospheric water vapor for meteorology. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 468–478. CrossRef
- Romero, R., C. Ramis, S. Alonso, C. A. Doswell, and D. J. Stensrud, 1998: Mesoscale model simulations of three heavy precipitation events in the western Mediterranean region. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 1859–1881. CrossRef
- Yuan, L., R. Anthes, R. Ware, C. Rocken, W. Bonner, M. Bevis, and S. Businger, 1993: Sensing global climate change using the Global Positioning System. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 14925–14937. CrossRef
- Yang, X., B. H. Sass, G.. Elgered, J. M. Johansson, and T. R. Emardson. 1999: A comparison of the integrated water vapor estimation by an NWP simulation and GPS observations. J. Appl. Meteor., 38, 941–956. CrossRef
- Zumberge, J. F., M. B. Heflin, D. C. Jefferson, M. M. Watkins, and F. H. Webb, 1997: Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 5005–5017. CrossRef
- A comparison of GPS- and NWP-derived PW data over the Korean Peninsula
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
Volume 27, Issue 4 , pp 871-882
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- SP Science Press
- Additional Links
- precipitable water
- numerical weather prediction model
- dry bias