Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty with ordinal likelihood information

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a model that is closely related to the so-called models of choice under complete uncertainty, in which the agent has no information about the probability of the outcomes. There are two approaches within the said models: the state space-based approach, which takes into account the possible states of nature and the correspondence between states and outcomes; and the set-based approach, which ignores such information, and solves certain difficulties arising from the state space-based approach. Kelsey (Int Econ Rev 34:297–308, 1993) incorporates into a state space-based framework the assumption that the agent has ordinal information about the likelihood of the states. This paper incorporates this same assumption into a set-based framework, thus filling a theoretical gap in the literature. Compared to the set-based models of choice under complete uncertainty we introduce the information about the ordinal likelihood of the outcomes while, compared to Kelsey’s approach, we incorporate the advantages of describing uncertainty environments from the set-based perspective. We present an axiomatic study that includes adaptations of some of the axioms found in the related literature and we characterize some rules featuring different combinations of information about the ordinal likelihood of the outcomes and information about their desirability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Ann Math Stat 34: 199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlegi R (2003) A note on Bossert, Pattanaik and Xu’s choice under complete uncertainty: axiomatic characterizations of some decision rules. Econ Theory 22: 219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlegi R (2007) Sequentially consistent rules of choice under complete uncertainty. J Econ Theory 135: 131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Hurwicz L (1972) An optimality criterion for decision-making under ignorance. In: Carter CF, Ford JL (eds) Uncertainty and expectations in economics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberà S, Barrett CR, Pattanaik PK (1984) On some axioms for ranking sets of alternatives. J Econ Theory 33: 301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberà S, Bossert W, Pattanaik PK (2004) Ranking sets of objects. In: Barberà S, Hammond PJ, Seidl C (eds) Handbook of utility theory, vol. 2. Kluwer, Boston, pp 893–977

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barberà S, Jackson M (1988) Maximin, leximin and the protective criterion. J Econ Theory 46: 34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett CR, Pattanaik PK (1955) Decision making under complete uncertainty: the ordinal framework. In: Dickinson D, Sen S (eds) Uncertainty and risk in economic life. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp 20–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert W (1989) On the extension of preferences over a set to the power set: an axiomatic characterization of a quasiordering. J Econ Theory 49: 84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert W (1995) Preference extension rules for ranking sets of alternatives with a fixed cardinality. Theory Decis 39: 301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert W, Pattanaik PK, Xu Y (2000) Choice under complete uncertainty: axiomatic characterizations of some decision rules. Econ Theory 16: 295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M, Jaffray JY (1980) Rational behaviour under complete ignorance. Econometrica 48: 1281–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P (1976) Manipulation of social choice functions. J Econ Theory 13: 217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond PJ (1999) Subjective expected utility. In: Barbera S, Hammond P, Seidl C (eds) Handbook of utility theory, vol. 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffray JY (1989) Linear utility theory for belief functions. Oper Res Lett 8: 107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffray JY (1991) Linear utility theory and belief functions: a discussion. In: Chikàn A (ed) Progress in decision, utility and risk theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannai Y, Peleg B (1984) A note on the extension of an order on a set to the power set. J Econ Theory 32: 172–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey D (1993) Choice under partial uncertainty. Int Econ Rev 34: 297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskin E (1979) Decision making under ignorance with implications for social choice. Theory Decis 11: 319–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitzan S, Pattanaik PK (1984) Median-based extensions of an ordering over a set to the power set: an axiomatic characterization. J Econ Theory 34: 252–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik PK, Peleg B (1984) An axiomatic characterization of the lexicographic maximin extension of an ordering over a set to the power set. Soc Choice Welf 1: 113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage LJ (1972) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Arlegi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alcalde-Unzu, J., Arlegi, R. & Ballester, M.A. Uncertainty with ordinal likelihood information. Soc Choice Welf 41, 397–425 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0689-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0689-8

Keywords

Navigation