Strategic, sincere, and heuristic voting under four election rules: an experimental study
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Van der Straeten, K., Laslier, JF., Sauger, N. et al. Soc Choice Welf (2010) 35: 435. doi:10.1007/s00355-010-0448-7
- 371 Downloads
We report on laboratory experiments on voting. In a setting where subjects have single-peaked preferences, we find that the rational choice theory provides very good predictions of actual individual behavior in one-round and approval voting elections but fares poorly in explaining vote choice under two-round elections. We conclude that voters behave strategically as far as strategic computations are not too demanding, in which case they rely on simple heuristics (under two-round voting) or they just vote sincerely (under single transferable vote).