Bovens L, Rabinowicz W (2004) Democratic answers to complex questions – an epistemic perspective. Synthese (forthcoming)

Brennan G (2001) Collective coherence?. Int Rev Law Econ 21(2):197–211

CrossRefChapman B (1998) More easily done than said: rules, reason and rational social choice. Oxford J Legal Stud 18:293–329

CrossRefChapman B (2002) Rational aggregation. Polit Philos Econ 1(3):337–354

CrossRefDietrich F (2004) Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems. J Econ Theory (forthcoming)

Dietrich F (2005) The possibility of judgment aggregation for network agendas. Working paper, University of Konstanz

Dietrich F, List C (2004a) Strategy-proof judgment aggregation. Working paper, London School of Economics

Dietrich F, List C (2004b) A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation. Working paper, London School of Economics

Dietrich F, List C (2005) Judgment aggregation by Quota Rules. Working paper, London School of Economics

Dokow E, Holzman R (2005) Aggregation of binary relations. Working paper, Technion Israel Institute of Technology

Gärdenfors P (2004) An arrow-like theorem for voting with logical consequences. Working paper, Lund University

Gekker R (2003) A probability-based doxastic logic. Working paper, Department of Economics, NUI, Galway

Hintikka J (1971) Some main problems of deontic logic. In: Hilpinen R (eds). Deontic logic: introductory and systematic readings. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 59–104

Kornhauser LA, Sager LG (1986) Unpacking the court. Yale Law J 96:82–117

CrossRefKripke S (1963) Semantical analysis of modal logic I: Normal propositional calculi. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9:67–96

Lewis D (1973) Counterfactuals. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

List C (2003) A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions. Math Soc Sci 45(1):1–13

CrossRefList C (2004a) The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions. Soc Choice Welfare (forthcoming)

List C (2004b) A model of path dependence in decisions over multiple propositions. Am Polit Sci Rev 98(3):495–513

CrossRefList C, Pettit P (2002) Aggregating sets of judgments: an impossibility result. Econ Philos 18:89–110

List C, Pettit P (2004) Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. Synthese 140(1–2):207–235

CrossRefMendelssohn E (1979) Introduction to mathematical logic. D. Van Nostrand

Mongin P (2005) Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation. Working paper, CNRS, Paris

Nehring K (2003) Arrow’s theorem as a corollary. Econ Lett 80:379–382

CrossRefNehring K, Puppe C (2002) Strategy-proof social choice on single-peaked domains: possibility, impossibility and the space between. Working paper, University of California at Davies

Nehring K, Puppe C (2004) Consistent judgement aggregation: a characterization. Working paper, University of Karlsruhe

Pauly M, van Hees M (2004) Logical constraints on judgment aggregation. J Philos Logic (forthcoming)

Pettit P (2001) Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma. Philos Issues 11:268–299

CrossRefPigozzi G (2004) Collective decision-making without paradoxes: an argument-based account. Working paper, King’s College, London

Priest G (2001) An introduction to non-classical logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Stalnaker R (1968): A theory of conditionals. In: Rescher N. (eds). Studies in logical theory. Blackwell, Oxford

van Hees M (2004) The limits of epistemic democracy. Working paper, University of Groningen

Wagner Decew J (1981) Conditional obligation and counterfactuals. J Philos Logic 10(1):55–72

CrossRefWilson R (1975) On the theory of aggregation. J Econ Theory 10:89–99

CrossRef