The learning curve in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: a 1-year retrospective evaluation of a novice and an expert
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The aim of this study was to compare a novice surgeon with an expert surgeon independently performing minimally invasive percutaneous neprolitholapaxy (PCNL) excluding the influence of the expert in the learning curve.
Clinical records of 84 patients (novice: n = 35; expert: n = 49) undergoing minimally invasive PCNL between 04/2007 and 04/2008 were retrospectively reviewed for the following parameters: drop in hemoglobin, operative and fluoroscopy time, length of hospital stay, stone-free rate and complication rate. Complications were graded according to the Clavien classification. Statistical analysis was carried out by student’s t test (Chi-square test) with p < 0.05 considered significant.
The novice surgeon experienced longer median operative and fluoroscopy time, lower stone-free rate and higher re-treatment rate (all p < 0.005) but no longer length of hospital stay (p = 0.19) compared to the experienced surgeon. The novice showed a notable improvement in operating time (p = 0.0208). Altogether, 16 complications occurred in 84 minimally invasive PCNL (19.1%) with five patients (6.0%) encountering grade III complications. Four patients (8.2%) treated by the expert surgeon developed complications (all grade I/II) compared to 12 of the patients (34.3%) treated by the novice surgeon (p = 0.0265). All grade III complications occurred in the first 20 patients of the novice surgeon group.
Despite longer operating time and a lower initial stone-free rate, the novice showed a significant improvement with growing experience and a low rate of higher grade (≥IIIa) complications. This demonstrates that the concept of minimally invasive PCNL can also be learned by urologists who do not have the support of an experienced colleague without endangering patient safety.
- Allen D, O’Brien T, Tiptaft R et al (2005) Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 19:279–282 CrossRef
- Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196 CrossRef
- Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A et al (2001) Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 58:345–350 CrossRef
- Hacker A, Wendt-Nordahl G, Honeck P et al (2007) A biological model to teach percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique with ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided access. J Endourol 21:545–550 CrossRef
- Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51:899–906 CrossRef
- Nagele U, Anastasiadis AG, Schilling DA et al (2007) Introducing a new sealant applicator for easy, safe, and quick closure of a mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy access tract. J Endourol 21:393–396 CrossRef
- Nagele U, Horstmann M, Sievert KD et al (2007) A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study. J Endourol 21:1113–1116 CrossRef
- Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG et al (2006) Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement. Urology 68:489–493 CrossRef
- Nagele U, Schilling D, Sievert KD et al (2008) Management of lower-pole stones of 0.8 to 1.5 cm maximal diameter by the minimally invasive percutaneous approach. J Endourol 22:1851–1853 CrossRef
- Patel SR, Haleblian GE, Pareek G (2010) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy can be safely performed in the high-risk patient. Urology 75:51–55
- Schilling D, Gakis G, Walcher U et al. (2009) Minimally invasive percutaneous treatment of lower pole stones with a diameter of 8 to 15 Millimeters. Aktuelle Urol 40:351–354
- Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M et al (2007) The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 52:206–211 CrossRef
- Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53:184–190 CrossRef
- The learning curve in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: a 1-year retrospective evaluation of a novice and an expert
World Journal of Urology
Volume 29, Issue 6 , pp 749-753
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Complication rate
- Learning curve
- Minimally invasive PCNL
- Stone-free rate
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- 2. Department of Urology, Community Hospital Hall i. T., Milser Str.10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria