Applied Physics B

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 467-474

First online:

Design considerations in high-sensitivity off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy

  • E.J. MoyerAffiliated withDept. of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago Email author 
  • , D.S. SayresAffiliated withDept. of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University
  • , G.S. EngelAffiliated withDept. of Chemistry, University of Chicago
  • , J.M. St. ClairAffiliated withDept. of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology
  • , F.N. KeutschAffiliated withDept. of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • , N.T. AllenAffiliated withDept. of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University
  • , J.H. KrollAffiliated withAerodyne Research
  • , J.G. AndersonAffiliated withDept. of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


Off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy (OA-ICOS) has generated much interest because it potentially allows highly sensitive field measurements with robust optical alignment. We discuss here design choices involved in design of an OA-ICOS instrument and how these choices impact instrument sensitivity, using as our example the design of the Harvard ICOS isotope instrument, which demonstrates the highest reported sensitivity for mid-IR OA-ICOS (2.4×10-11 cm-1Hz-1/2 at 6.7 μm, obtained during measurements of water vapor isotopologues H2O, HDO, and H218O in the laboratory and onboard NASA’s WB-57 high-altitude research aircraft). We compare the sensitivity of several OA-ICOS instruments with differing design parameters, show how comparisons are hindered by differing definitions of instrument performance metrics, and suggest a common metric of MDAmeas, the fractional absorption equivalent to 1σ uncertainty in an actual measurement, normalized to 1 s integration. We also note that despite an emphasis on sensitivity in the literature, in the Harvard ICOS isotope instrument and likely also similar instruments, systematic errors associated with fitting of the baseline laser power are of equal importance to total measurement uncertainty.