Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Passive acoustic telemetry reveals highly variable home range and movement patterns among unicornfish within a marine reserve

  • Report
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marine reserves are the primary management tool for Guam’s reef fish fishery. While a build-up of fish biomass has occurred inside reserve boundaries, it is unknown whether reserve size matches the scale of movement of target species. Using passive acoustic telemetry, we quantified movement patterns and home range size of two heavily exploited unicornfish Naso unicornis and Naso lituratus. Fifteen fish (N. unicornis: n = 7; N. lituratus: n = 4 male, n = 4 female) were fitted with internal acoustic tags and tracked continuously over four months within a remote acoustic receiver array located in a decade-old marine reserve. This approach provided robust estimates of unicornfish movement patterns and home range size. The mean home range of 3.2 ha for N. unicornis was almost ten times larger than that previously recorded from a three-week tracking study of the species in Hawaii. While N. lituratus were smaller in body size, their mean home range (6.8 ha) was over twice that of N. unicornis. Both species displayed strong site fidelity, particularly during nocturnal and crepuscular periods. Although there was some overlap, individual movement patterns and home range size were highly variable within species and between sexes. N. unicornis home range increased with body size, and only the three largest fish home ranges extended into the deeper outer reef slope beyond the shallow reef flat. Both Naso species favoured habitat dominated by corals. Some individuals made predictable daily crepuscular migrations between different locations or habitat types. There was no evidence of significant spillover from the marine reserve into adjacent fished areas. Strong site fidelity coupled with negligible spillover suggests that small-scale reserves, with natural habitat boundaries to emigration, are effective in protecting localized unicornfish populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Bartholomew A, Bohnsack JA, Smith SG, Ault JS, Harper DE, McClellan DB (2008) Influence of marine reserve size and boundary length on the initial response of exploited reef fishes in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, USA. Landsc Ecol 23:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden SK (2001) Using ultrasonic telemetry to determine home range of a coral reef fish. In: Sibert JR, Nielsen JL (eds) Electronic tagging and tracking in marine fisheries. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 167–188

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Botsford LW, Micheli F, Hastings A (2003) Principles for the design of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13(Supplement):S25–S31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick DR (2006) Guam Coastal Atlas. University of Guam Marine Laboratory, Multimedia Publication No. 4. http://www.guammarinelab.com/coastal.atlas/index.htm

  • Calenge C (2006) The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman MR, Kramer DL (2000) Movements of fishes within and among fringing coral reefs in Barbados. Environ Biol Fish 57:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chateau O, Wantiez L (2007) Site fidelity and activity patterns of a humphead wrasse, Cheilinus undulatus (Labridae), as determined by acoustic telemetry. Environ Biol Fish 80:503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chateau O, Wantiez L (2009) Movement patterns of four coral reef fish species in a fragmented habitat in New Caledonia: implications for the design of marine protected area networks. ICES J Mar Sci 66:50–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claisse JT, Clark TB, Schumacher BD, McTee SA, Bushnell ME, Callan CK, Laidley CW, Parrish JD (2011) Conventional tagging and acoustic telemetry of a small surgeonfish, Zebrasoma flavescens, in a structurally complex coral reef environment. Environ Biol Fish. doi: 10.1007/s10641-011-9771-9

  • Claudet J, Osenberg CW, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Domenici P, García-Charton J, Pérez-Ruzafa A, Badalamenti F, Bayle-Sempere J, Brito A, Bulleri F, Culioli J, Dimech M, Falcón JM, Guala I, Milazzo M, Sánchez-Meca J, Somerfield PJ, Stobart B, Vandeperre F, Valle C, Planes S (2008) Marine reserves: size and age do matter. Ecol Lett 11:481–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren CP, Eggleston DB (2000) Ecological processes underlying ontogenetic habitat shifts in a coral reef fish. Ecology 81:2227–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danilowicz BS, Sale PF (1999) Relative intensity of predation on the French grunt, Haemulon flavolineatum, during diurnal, dusk, and nocturnal periods on a coral reef. Mar Biol 133:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eristhee N, Oxenford H (2001) Home range size and use of space by Bermuda chub Kyphosus sectatrix (L.) in two marine reserves in the Soufriere Marine Management Area, St Lucia, West Indies. J Fish Biol 59:129–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell FR, Roberts CM (2003) Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 18:448–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett R, Moy W (2006) Spearfishing in the Pacific Islands. Current status and management issues. FAO/FishCode Review. No. 19. FAO, Romes, p72 http://www.fao.org/fishery/publications/2006/en

  • Halpern BS, Warner RR (2003) Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectives. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1871–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardman E, Green JM, Desiré S, Perrine S (2010) Movement of sonically tagged bluespine unicornfish, Naso unicornis, in relation to marine reserve boundaries in Rodrigues, western Indian Ocean. Aquat Conserv 20:357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensley RA, Sherwood TS (1993) An overview of Guam’s inshore fisheries. Mar Fish Rev 55:129–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Heupel MR, Semmens JM, Hobday AJ (2006) Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays. Mar Freshw Res 57:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt CH, Seibold SE, Jesien RV (1994) Potential use of biotelemetry in tropical continental waters. Rev Hydrobiol Trop 27:77–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland KN, Peterson JD, Lowe CG, Wetherbee BM (1993) Movements, distribution and growth rates of the white goatfish Mulloides flavolineatus in a fisheries conservation zone. Bull Mar Sci 52:982–992

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland KN, Lowe CG, Wetherbee BM (1996) Movements and dispersal patterns of blue trevally (Caranx melampygus) in a fisheries conservation zone. Fish Res 25:279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson N, Rhodes KL (2010) Home range estimates for squaretail coralgrouper, Plectropomus areolatus (Ruppell 1830). Coral Reefs 29:511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern JW, McDonald T, Amstrup SC, Durner GM, Erickson WP (2003) Using the bootstrap and fast Fourier transform to estimate confidence intervals of 2D kernel densities. Environ Ecol Stat 10:405–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer DL, Chapman MR (1999) Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function. Environ Biol Fish 55:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light PR, Jones GP (1997) Habitat preference in newly settled coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus, Serranidae). Coral Reefs 16:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe CG, Topping DT, Cartamil DP, Papastamatiou YP (2003) Movement patterns, home range, and habitat utilization of adult kelp bass Paralabrax clathratus in a temperate no-take marine reserve. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 256:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland WN, Wahl C, Suchaneck T, McLary F (1999) The behaviour of animals around twilight with emphasis on coral reef communities. In: Archer S, Djamgoz MB, Loew E, Partridge JC, Vallerga S (eds) The adaptive mechanisms in the ecology of vision. Kluwer Academic, London, pp 583–628

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer CG, Holland KN (2005) Movement patterns, home range size and habitat utilisation of the bluespine unicornfish, Naso unicornis (Acanthuridae) in a Hawaiian marine reserve. Environ Biol Fish 73:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer CG, Honebrink R (2005) Retention of surgically implanted transmitters by bluefin trevally (Caranx melampygus). Implications for long-term movement studies. Trans Am Fish Soc 134:602–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer CG, Holland KN, Wetherbee BM, Lowe CG (2000) Movement patterns, habitat utilization, home range size and site fidelity of whitesaddle goatfish, Parupeneus porphyreus, in a marine reserve. Environ Biol Fish 59:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer CG, Papastamatiou YP, Holland KN (2007a) Seasonal, diel and tidal movements of green jobfish (Aprion virescens, Lutjanidae) at remote Hawaiian atolls: implications for marine protected area design. Mar Biol 151:2133–2143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer CG, Holland KN, Papastamatiou YP (2007b) Seasonal and diel movements of giant trevally (Caranx ignobilis) at remote Hawaiian atolls: implications for the design of Marine Protected Areas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 333:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer CG, Papastamatiou YP, Clark TB (2010) Differential movement patterns and site fidelity among trophic groups of reef fishes in a Hawaiian marine protected area. Mar Biol 157:1499–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro JL (2000) Outmigration and movement of tagged coral reef fish in a marine fishery reserve in Jamaica. Proc Gulf Caribb Fish Inst 51:557–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y, Tsuchiya M (2008) Spatial and temporal patterns of seagrass habitat use by fishes at the Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanami A, Yamada H (2008) Size and spatial arrangement of home range of checkered snapper Lutjanus decussatus (Lutjanidae) in an Okinawan coral reef determined using a portable GPS receiver. Mar Biol 153:1103–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanami A, Yamada H (2009) Site fidelity, size, and spatial arrangement of daytime home range of thumbprint emperor Lethrinus harak (Lethrinidae). Fish Sci 75:1109–1116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi SR (2004) Marine reserves and ocean neighbourhoods: the spatial scale of marine populations and their management. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:31–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons DM, Babcock RC, Hankin RKS, Willis TJ, Aitken JP, O’Dor RK, Jackson GD (2003) Snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) home range dynamics: acoustic tagging studies in a marine reserve. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 262:253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team R (2009) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Randall JE (2001) Surgeonfishes of Hawaii and the world. Mutual Publishing and Bishop Museum Press, Hawaii, p 123

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes KL, Tupper MH (2008) The vulnerability of reproductively active squaretail coralgrouper (Plectropomus areolatus) to fishing. Fish Bull 106:194–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickel S, Genin A (2005) Twilight transitions in coral reef fish: the input of light-induced changes in foraging behaviour. Anim Behav 70:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CM, Hawkins JP (1997) How small can a marine reserve be and still be effective? Coral Reefs 16:150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CM, Polunin NVC (1991) Are marine reserves effective in management of reef fisheries? Rev Fish Biol Fish 1:65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DR (1983) On the spawning behaviour and spawning cycles of eight surgeonfishes (Acanthuridae) from the Indo-Pacific. Environ Biol Fish 9:193–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DR, Gaines SD (1986) Interference competition structures habitat use in a local assemblage of coral reef surgeonfishes. Ecology 67:1372–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR (2002) Yet another review of marine reserves as reef fisheries management tools. In: Sale PF (ed) Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 421–443

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR, Alcala AC (1996) Do marine reserves export adult fish biomass? Evidence from Apo Island, central Philippines. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 132:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sale PF, Cowen RK, Danilowicz BS, Jones GP, Kritzer JP, Lindeman KC, Planes S, Poulin NVC, Russ GR, Sadovy YJ, Steneck RS (2005) Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 20:74–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samoilys MA (1997) Movement in a large predatory fish: coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus (Pisces: Serranidae), on the Heron reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 16:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR, Hueter RE (2002) Estimation of short-term centres of activity from an array of omnidirectional hydrophones and its use in studying animal movements. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tupper M (2007) Spillover of commercially valuable reef fishes from marine protected areas in Guam, Micronesia. Fish Bull 105:527–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Worton BJ (1987) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller DC (1997) Home range and activity patterns of the coral trout Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 154:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller DC (1999) Ultrasonic telemetry: its application to coral reef fisheries research. Fish Bull 97:1058–1065

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller DC, Booth S, Davis G, Pauly D (2007) Re-estimation of small-scale fishery catches for U.S. flag-associated island areas in the western Pacific: the last 50 years. Fish Bull 105:266–277

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by US Fish and Wildlife Service Sport Fish Restoration Program Grant Number: F14-R1. We would like to thank students and associates of the McIlwain lab for their help in the field, but especially Mark Priest for his large contribution of assistance throughout this project. We are grateful for the logistical support provided by the UOG Marine Laboratory Technicians. We also appreciate comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers that helped improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Marshell.

Additional information

Communicated by Biology Editor Prof. Philip Munday

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. 6

Habitat-related individual home range area estimates of Naso unicornis (ag) and Naso lituratus (females: hk; males: lo). Pink bubble contour = 95% kernel utilization density (KUD); green bubble contour = 50% KUD; blue line = 95% minimum convex polygon (MCP). Colour codes for habitat types are shown in the legend. (EPS 5547 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshell, A., Mills, J.S., Rhodes, K.L. et al. Passive acoustic telemetry reveals highly variable home range and movement patterns among unicornfish within a marine reserve. Coral Reefs 30, 631–642 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0770-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0770-2

Keywords

Navigation