Coral Reefs

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 283–294

Coral reef recovery dynamics in a changing world

Report

DOI: 10.1007/s00338-010-0717-z

Cite this article as:
Graham, N.A.J., Nash, K.L. & Kool, J.T. Coral Reefs (2011) 30: 283. doi:10.1007/s00338-010-0717-z

Abstract

Coral reef ecosystems are degrading through multiple disturbances that are becoming more frequent and severe. The complexities of this degradation have been studied in detail, but little work has assessed characteristics that allow reefs to bounce back and recover between pulse disturbance events. We quantitatively review recovery rates of coral cover from pulse disturbance events among 48 different reef locations, testing the relative roles of disturbance characteristics, reef characteristics, connectivity and anthropogenic influences. Reefs in the western Pacific Ocean had the fastest recovery, whereas reefs in the geographically isolated eastern Pacific Ocean were slowest to recover, reflecting regional differences in coral composition, fish functional diversity and geographic isolation. Disturbances that opened up large areas of benthic space recovered quickly, potentially because of nonlinear recovery where recruitment rates were high. The type of disturbance had a limited effect on subsequent rates of reef recovery, although recovery was faster following crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks. This inconsequential role of disturbance type may be in part due to the role of unaltered structural complexity in maintaining key reef processes, such as recruitment and herbivory. Few studies explicitly recorded potential ecological determinants of recovery, such as recruitment rates, structural complexity of habitat and the functional composition of reef-associated fish. There was some evidence of slower recovery rates within protected areas compared with other management systems and fished areas, which may reflect the higher initial coral cover in protected areas rather than reflecting a management effect. A better understanding of the driving role of processes, structural complexity and diversity on recovery may enable more appropriate management actions that support coral-dominated ecosystems in our changing climate.

Keywords

ResilienceEcosystem functionDiversityMarine protected areasCoral bleachingCoral reef ecology

Supplementary material

338_2010_717_MOESM1_ESM.doc (115 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 115 kb)
338_2010_717_MOESM2_ESM.eps (7 kb)
Fig. S1Mean annual rate of change in per cent coral cover recovery calculated for (a) all sites, (b) omitting the Seychelles data which contributed a large number of sites to the data set (8) and (c) when including one site per study (n = number of sites; error bars = 95% bootstrapped CI). (EPS 7 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Institute of Marine ScienceTownsvilleAustralia