Abdominal radiology

European Radiology

, Volume 9, Issue 7, pp 1411-1417

First online:

MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP

  • D. J. LomasAffiliated withUniversity Department of Radiology, Box 219, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
  • , P. W. P. BearcroftAffiliated withUniversity Department of Radiology, Box 219, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
  • , A. E. GimsonAffiliated withUniversity Department of Radiology, Box 219, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract.

The aim of this study was to compare prospectively a breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) technique with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Seventy-six patients with suspected strictures or choledocholithiasis were referred for MRCP and subsequent ERCP examination, which were performed within 4 h of each other. The MRCP technique was performed using fat-suppressed rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) projection images obtained in standardised planes with additional targeted projections as required by the supervising radiologist. Two radiologists (in consensus) assessed the MRCP results prospectively and independently for the presence of bile duct calculi, strictures, non-specific biliary dilatation and pancreatic duct dilatation, and recorded a single primary diagnosis. The ERCP was assessed prospectively and independently by a single endoscopist and used as a gold standard for comparison with MRCP. Diagnostic agreement was assessed by the Kappa statistic. The MRCP technique failed in two patients and ERCP in five. In the remaining 69 referrals ERCP demonstrated normal findings in 23 cases, strictures in 19 cases, choledocholithiasis in 9 cases, non-specific biliary dilatation in 14 cases and chronic pancreatitis in 4 cases. The MRCP technique correctly demonstrated 22 of 23 normal cases, 19 strictures with one false positive (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 98 %), all 9 cases of choledocholithiasis with two false positives (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 97 %), 12 of 14 cases of non-specific biliary dilatation and only 1 of 4 cases of chronic pancreatitis. There was overall good agreement for diagnosis based on a kappa value of 0.88. Breath-hold projection MRCP can provide non-invasively comparable diagnostic information to diagnostic ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis and biliary strictures and may allow more selective use of therapeutic ERCP.

Key words: MRI MR cholangiopancreatography ERCP Bile ducts