Skip to main content
Log in

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the differentiation of malignant from benign strictures in the periampullary region

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the value of DWI for differentiating malignant from benign strictures in the periampullary region.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed data from 78 patients who had undergone magnetic resonance cholangiopanreatography (MRCP) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), in whom biliary strictures in the periampullary region were suspected. Twenty-two malignant and 56 benign lesions were included. One radiologist compared the signal intensity of malignant and benign periampullary lesions on DWI using b = 500 and 800 s/mm2. The signal intensity of bile was also compared, and an optimal b value was determined for periampullary lesions. Two other radiologists reviewed MRCP alone and combined DWI and MRCP for the possibility of malignant periampullary lesions. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for each reviewer by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Malignant periampullary lesions more frequently appeared hyperintense than benign lesions on DWI using the two b values (P < 0.001). Bile more frequently appeared hyperintense on DWI using b = 500 s/mm2 (87.2 %) than b = 800 s/mm2 (24.4 %). Therefore, b = 800 s/mm2 was determined as the preferred sequence. Diagnostic accuracy for malignant periampullary lesions improved for both reviewers after adding DWI; from 0.714 to 0.924 (P = 0.006, for reviewer 1) and from 0.714 to 0.919 (P = 0.007, reviewer 2).

Conclusions

Combined DWI with MRCP can improve the diagnostic accuracy for differentiating malignant from benign strictures in the periampullary region.

Key Points

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging provides yet more information about hepatobiliary structures.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has now been applied to the biliary tree.

Most periampullary carcinomas appear hyperintense on high b value DWI.

DWI can help differentiate between malignant and benign periampullary lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koh DM, Takahara T, Imai Y et al (2007) Practical aspects of assessing tumors using clinical diffusion-weighted imaging in the body. Magn Reson Med Sci 6:211–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koh DM, Collins DJ (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR 188:1622–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Qayyum A (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: concepts and applications. Radiographics 29:1797–1810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandrasegaran K, Akisik FM, Lin C et al (2009) Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. AJR 193:1556–1560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E et al (2003) Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 226:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruegel M, Holzapfel K, Gaa J et al (2008) Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging technique. Eur Radiol 18:477–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS et al (2008) Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 246:812–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Motosugi U et al (2007) High-b value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results. AJR 188:409–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fattahi R, Balci NC, Perman WH et al (2009) Pancreatic diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): comparison between mass-forming focal pancreatitis (FP), pancreatic cancer (PC), and normal pancreas. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:350–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Kubo H et al (2008) High-b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic cancer and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis: preliminary results. Acta Radiol 49:383–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang J, Tehrani YM, Wang L et al (2008) Renal masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging—a preliminary experience. Radiology 247:458–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Motosugi U et al (2006) High-B-value diffusion-weighted MRI in colorectal cancer. AJR 187:181–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haider MA, van der Kwast TH, Tanguay J et al (2007) Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. AJR 189:323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H et al (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 15:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T et al (2008) The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 18:723–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cui XY, Chen HW (2010) Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 16:3196–3201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JH, Kim MJ, Chung JJ et al (2002) Differential diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas at MR imaging. Radiographics 22:1335–1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim TU, Kim S, Lee JW et al (2008) Ampulla of Vater: comprehensive anatomy, MR imaging of pathologic conditions, and correlation with endoscopy. Eur J Radiol 66:48–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andersson M, Kostic S, Johansson M et al (2005) MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus helical CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected periampullary tumors: a prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol 46:16–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim MJ, Mitchell DG, Ito K et al (2000) Biliary dilatation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes—value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 214:173–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kandpal H, Sharma R, Madhusudhan KS et al (2009) Respiratory-triggered versus breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI of liver lesions: comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient values. AJR 192:915–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park MS, Kim TK, Kim KW et al (2004) Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology 233:234–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chung YE, Kim MJ, Kim HM et al (2011) Differentiation of benign and malignant ampullary obstructions on MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 80:198–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T et al (2004) Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med 22:275–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Low RN, Gurney J (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the oncology patient: value of breathhold DWI compared to unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:848–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sugita R, Yamazaki T, Furuta A et al (2009) High b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting gallbladder carcinoma: preliminary study and results. Eur Radiol 19:1794–1798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim S, Lee NK, Lee JW et al (2007) CT evaluation of the bulging papilla with endoscopic correlation. Radiographics 27:1023–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Feuerlein S, Pauls S, Juchems MS et al (2009) Pitfalls in abdominal diffusion-weighted imaging: how predictive is restricted water diffusion for malignancy. AJR 193:1070–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeh BM, Liu PS, Soto JA et al (2009) MR imaging and CT of the biliary tract. Radiographics 29:1669–1688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suk Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, N.K., Kim, S., Seo, H.I. et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the differentiation of malignant from benign strictures in the periampullary region. Eur Radiol 23, 1288–1296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2725-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2725-6

Keywords

Navigation