European Radiology

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 476–486

Review of radiological scoring methods of osteoporotic vertebral fractures for clinical and research settings

  • Ling Oei
  • Fernando Rivadeneira
  • Felisia Ly
  • Stephan J. Breda
  • M. Carola Zillikens
  • Albert Hofman
  • André G. Uitterlinden
  • Gabriel P. Krestin
  • Edwin H. G. Oei
Musculoskeletal

DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2622-z

Cite this article as:
Oei, L., Rivadeneira, F., Ly, F. et al. Eur Radiol (2013) 23: 476. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2622-z

Abstract

Background

Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease; vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fractures.

Methods

Several radiological scoring methods using different criteria for osteoporotic vertebral fractures exist. Quantitative morphometry (QM) uses ratios derived from direct vertebral body height measurements to define fractures. Semi-quantitative (SQ) visual grading is performed according to height and area reduction. The algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) method introduced a scheme to systematically rule out non-fracture deformities and diagnoses osteoporotic vertebral fractures based on endplate depression. The concordance across methods is currently a matter of debate.

Results

This article reviews the most commonly applied standardised radiographic scoring methods for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, attaining an impartial perspective of benefits and limitations. It provides image examples and discusses aspects that facilitate large-scale application, such as automated image analysis software and different imaging investigations. It also reviews the implications of different fracture definitions for scientific research and clinical practice.

Conclusion

Accurate standardised scoring methods for assessing osteoporotic vertebral fractures are crucial, considering that differences in definition will have implications for patient care and scientific research. Evaluation of the feasibility and concordance among methods will allow establishing their benefits and limitations, and most importantly, optimise their effectiveness for widespread application.

Key Points

Several scoring methods using different criteria for assessing osteoporotic vertebral fractures exist.

Standardised osteoporotic vertebral fracture assessment should be applicable to different radiological investigations.

Accurate assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures is essential for proper patient management.

Optimising feasibility of scoring methods enables widespread use in scientific research.

Assessment of concordance between methods is important for application in patient care.

Keywords

Osteoporosis Vertebral Fracture Radiography Diagnosis Epidemiologic Studies 

Abbreviations

BMD

Bone mineral density

QM

Quantitative morphometry

SQ

Semi-quantitative method

SFI

Spinal fracture index

ABQ

Algorithm-based qualitative method

DXA

Dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry

SD

Standard deviation

FRAX

Fracture risk assessment tool

VFA

Vertebral fracture assessment

CT

Computed tomography

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ling Oei
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  • Fernando Rivadeneira
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 6
  • Felisia Ly
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Stephan J. Breda
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • M. Carola Zillikens
    • 1
    • 3
    • 7
  • Albert Hofman
    • 2
    • 3
  • André G. Uitterlinden
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 8
  • Gabriel P. Krestin
    • 4
  • Edwin H. G. Oei
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI)-sponsored Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging (NCHA)RotterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Departments of Internal Medicine and EpidemiologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Departments of Internal Medicine and EpidemiologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  7. 7.Department of Internal MedicineErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  8. 8.Departments of Internal Medicine and EpidemiologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands