Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours
- Leonardo Kayat BittencourtAffiliated withCDPI Clinics—Abdominal and Pelvic Imaging, Rio de Janeiro Federal University Email author
- , Jelle O. BarentszAffiliated withDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
- , Luiz Carlos Duarte de MirandaAffiliated withDepartment of Urology, Rio de Janeiro Federal University
- , Emerson Leandro GasparettoAffiliated withDepartment of Radiology, CDPI and Multi-Imagem Clinics, Rio de Janeiro Federal University
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To investigate the usefulness of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients (ADC) in predicting prostatectomy Gleason Grades (pGG) and Scores (GS), compared with ultrasound-guided biopsy Gleason Grades (bGG).
Twenty-four patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer were included in the study. Diffusion-weighted images were obtained using 1.5-T MR with a pelvic phased-array coil. Median ADC values (b0,500,1000 s/mm²) were measured at the most suspicious areas in the peripheral zone. The relationship between ADC values and pGG or GS was assessed using Pearson’s coefficient. The relationship between bGG and pGG or GS was also evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the performance of each method on a qualitative level.
A significant negative correlation was found between mean ADCs of suspicious lesions and their pGG (r = −0.55; p < 0.01) and GS (r = −0.63; p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found between bGG and pGG (r = 0.042; p > 0.05) or GS (r = 0.048; p > 0.05). ROC analysis revealed a discriminatory performance of AUC = 0.82 for ADC and AUC = 0.46 for bGG in discerning low-grade from intermediate/high-grade lesions.
The ADC values of suspicious areas in the peripheral zone perform better than bGG in the correlation with prostate cancer aggressiveness, although with considerable intra-subject heterogeneity.
• Prostate cancer aggressiveness is probably underestimated and undersampled by routine ultrasound-guided biopsies.
• Diffusion-weighted MR images show good linear correlation with prostate cancer aggressiveness.
• DWI information may be used to improve risk-assessment in prostate cancer.
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imaging Prostate cancer Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Biopsy biological markers
- Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours
Volume 22, Issue 2 , pp 468-475
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Magnetic resonance imaging
- Prostate cancer
- Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
- biological markers
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. CDPI Clinics—Abdominal and Pelvic Imaging, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Av. Das Americas, 4666, sl 325, centro medico, 22640102, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- 2. Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- 3. Department of Urology, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 4. Department of Radiology, CDPI and Multi-Imagem Clinics, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil