Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To compare routine dose liver CT reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) versus low dose images reconstructed with FBP and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).
In this retrospective study, patients had a routine dose protocol reconstructed with FBP, and again within 17 months (median 6.1 months), had a low dose protocol reconstructed twice, with FBP and ASIR. These reconstructions were compared for noise, image quality, and radiation dose.
Nineteen patients were included. (12 male, mean age 58). Noise was significantly lower in low dose images reconstructed with ASIR compared to routine dose images reconstructed with FBP (liver: p < .05, aorta: p < 0.001). Low dose FBP images were scored significantly lower for subjective image quality than low dose ASIR (2.1 ± 0.5, 3.2 ± 0.8, p < 0.001). There was no difference in subjective image quality scores between routine dose FBP images and low dose ASIR images (3.6 ± 0.5, 3.2 ± 0.8, NS).Radiation dose was 41% less for the low dose protocol (4.4 ± 2.4 mSv versus 7.5 ± 5.5 mSv, p < 0.05).
Our initial results suggest low dose CT images reconstructed with ASIR may have lower measured noise, similar image quality, yet significantly less radiation dose compared with higher dose images reconstructed with FBP.
- Yanagawa, M, Honda, O, Yoshida, S (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard- and reduced-dose CT. Acad Radiol 17: pp. 1259-1266 CrossRef
- Prakash, P, Kalra, MK, Kambadakone, AK (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45: pp. 202-210 CrossRef
- Prakash, P, Kalra, MK, Digumarthy, SR (2010) Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34: pp. 40-45 CrossRef
- Marin, D, Nelson, RC, Schindera, ST (2010) Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm–initial clinical experience. Radiology 254: pp. 145-153 CrossRef
- Hara, AK, Paden, RG, Silva, AC, Kujak, JL, Lawder, HJ, Pavlicek, W (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193: pp. 764-771 CrossRef
- Flicek, KT, Hara, AK, Silva, AC, Wu, Q, Peter, MB, Johnson, CD (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195: pp. 126-131 CrossRef
- Silva, AC, Lawder, HJ, Hara, A, Kujak, J, Pavlicek, W (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194: pp. 191-199 CrossRef
- Leipsic, J, Labounty, TM, Heilbron, B (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195: pp. 649-654 CrossRef
- Sagara, Y, Hara, AK, Pavlicek, W, Silva, AC, Paden, RG, Wu, Q (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195: pp. 713-719 CrossRef
- Singh, S, Kalra, MK, Hsieh, J (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 257: pp. 373-3836 CrossRef
- Kanal, KM, Stewart, BK, Kolokythas, O, Shuman, WP (2007) Impact of operator-selected image noise index and reconstruction slice thickness on patient radiation dose in 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189: pp. 219-225 CrossRef
- AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee (2008) The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT [AAPM Report 96]. American Association of Physicists in Medicine College Park, MD. Available via http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_96.pdf. Accessed 04 January 2011
- Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose
Volume 22, Issue 1 , pp 138-143
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Image quality
- Low dose CT
- Adaptive statistical iterative
- Filtered back projection
- Radiation dose reduction
- Industry Sectors